Surgical treatment of joint burn scar contracture: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term outcome evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Burn patients often have functional problems due to joint scar contracture. Patients suffering from such contracture often experience considerable limitations in daily life. Therefore, surgical treatment is often necessary. Skin grafts, especially full-thickness skin grafts and flaps remain the most commonly used surgical methods in clinical practice. However, there are no clear guidelines stating which technique is the most effective treatment. Herein, we conducted a retrospective cohort study over 10 years of experience at a single center to investigate whether flaps or FTSGs exhibit a better long-term effect. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with joint burn scar contracture and collected data related to patient demographic profiles, and detailed descriptions of the scars, surgical procedures, and follow-up were collected. We performed follow-up evaluation of three aspects: adverse events (recontracture, ache, and pruritus), satisfaction scores for function and aesthetics, and scar quality (Vancouver Scar Scale score). RESULTS: Follow-up results 1 year after surgery from 88 patients were analyzed. In total, 4 (10%) patients in the flap group and 13 (27.1%) patients in the FTSG group had recontracture; the incidence of recontracture was lower in the flap group than in the FTSG group (P=0.043). The functional satisfaction score of the flap group was higher than that of the FTSG group (P=0.027). Moreover, follow-up results 5 year after surgery for 47 patients were analyzed. In total, 1 (4.8%) patient in the flap group and 7 (26.9%) patients in the FTSG group had recontracture; the incidence of recontracture was significantly lower in the flap group than in the FTSG group (P=0.044). The functional satisfaction score in the flap group was higher than that of the FTSG group (P=0.041). In this study, no significant differences in scar quality were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: If conditions permit, the application of different types of flaps may represent a better choice than FTSGs in terms of reducing the recontracture rate and improving joint function.

Short- and long-term efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy in split-thickness skin grafts: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Graft fixation is essential for the successful survival of skin grafts. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can be utilized for fixing a skin graft, ensuring adhesion of the graft with continuous and uniform pressure. However, the reported short- and long-term efficacy of NPWT in split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) is inconsistent, with few studies on the long-term efficacy (scar quality). To clarify the appropriate methods of skin graft fixation, we conducted a single-center retrospective study on the shortand long-term effects of skin grafting using different fixation methods. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent STSG from December 2010 to June 2019. The patients were divided into two groups based on the skin graft-fixing method: an NPWT group and a conventional mechanical fixation group. Medical data including age, sex, underlying diseases, wound etiology, recipient site, surgical methods, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and follow-up data (Vancouver Scar Scale score and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 392 cases were ultimately included in the analysis. Among them, 218 cases were fixed with NPWT for skin grafting and 174 with conventional mechanical fixation. No significant differences in baseline data were noted between the two groups. The total graft survival rate in the NPWT group was higher than that in the conventional mechanical fixation group (86.7% vs. 74.1%, P=0.002). Moreover, the infection rate in the NPWT group was lower than that in the conventional mechanical fixation group (5.5% vs. 13.2%, P=0.008). In terms of scar quality, no significant difference was observed, except for in the hand. Overall, the scar surface regularity was better in the NPWT group than in the control group. (P=0.019 for Patient Scar Assessment Scale, P=0.025 for Observer Scar Assessment Scale). CONCLUSIONS: NPWT is an effective approach for fixing skin grafts. Compared with conventional mechanical fixation, NPWT can significantly improve the survival rate and reduce the infection rate of STSG. In the long-term, NPWT can also improve scar surface regularity in the hand, with an esthetic effect that is more satisfactory to clinicians and patients.

Sex-specific survival benefit in early skin melanoma based on 8th AJCC edition: an analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

BACKGROUND: Females have been found to have a survival benefit over males in past studies. However, in early melanoma patients, this benefit occurred in only those aged >60 years. The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) readjusted the melanoma staging system, specifically stage I. This study aims to verify whether the sex-specific benefit in females exists in different age groups according to the 8th edition of the staging system. METHODS: We collected the data of individuals diagnosed with skin melanoma between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Based on the 8th edition of the melanoma staging system, patients diagnosed with pathological stage T1a-T3a, N0 and M0 melanoma were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 115,576 patients, including 62,938 male patients and 52,638 female patients, were enrolled in this study. The survival rates of males and females in each stage from IA-IIA were significantly different (P<0.001). In further analyses of each age group, it was found that the proportions of patients with stages IA, IB and IIA were significantly different in each age group. Cox analysis showed that females with stage IA in all age groups benefited significantly, but those in stage IB benefited only when they were aged >60 years. In stage IIA patients, there were significant differences between the <50 and 61-70 years age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on data from the SEER database, we found that according to the 8th edition of the AJCC melanoma staging system, females had a higher survival rate than males, and this difference was significant in all age groups in the stage IA group but fluctuated with age in the stage IB and IIA groups.