Differential effects of chlorthalidone versus spironolactone on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in hypertensive patients.

CONTEXT: Previous studies in rats indicated that thiazide-type diuretics reduced blood pressure (BP) and triggered baroreflex-mediated increase in sympathetic nerve activity (SNA), whereas spironolactone exerted central sympathoinhibitory action in addition to diuretic effects. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine effects of spironolactone and chlorthalidone on SNA and the role of SNA on diuretic-induced insulin resistance in human hypertension. METHODS: We conducted a randomized crossover study in 23 untreated hypertensive patients in which we measured muscle SNA at baseline, after 1 and 3 months of chlorthalidone (12.5-25 mg/d), and after 1 and 3 months of spironolactone (50-75 mg/d). Ambulatory BP, baroreflex sensitivity, and indices of insulin resistance were also assessed at baseline and after 3 months of each drug treatment. RESULTS: Chlorthalidone caused a similar reduction in ambulatory BP from baseline when compared with spironolactone (11 +/- 2/4 +/- 2 and 10 +/- 2/4 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively). However, chlorthalidone increased SNA by 23% (P < 0.01) within 1 month of treatment, whereas spironolactone had no effect in the same subjects. SNA continued to be elevated after 3 months of chlorthalidone when compared with baseline and spironolactone. Baroreflex control of SNA was unaffected by either drug. Chlorthalidone increased indices of insulin resistance, which were significantly correlated with increases in SNA from baseline, whereas spironolactone had no effect in the same subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that chlorthalidone, the first-line drug therapy for hypertension, causes persistent activation of sympathetic nervous system and insulin resistance in hypertensive patients. These side effects, however, are avoided by spironolactone despite similar reduction in BP.

Oral direct renin inhibition: premise, promise, and potential limitations of a new antihypertensive drug.

The first oral direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, recently received approval for the treatment of hypertension. This article addresses the premise, promise, and potential limitations of this new class of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor. Although aliskiren adds to a list of more than 100 drugs approved for the treatment of hypertension, its introduction into clinical medicine is of particular interest because of the novel mechanism of action: inhibition of renin's catalytic activity, the most proximal and rate-limiting step in renin-angiotensin system activation. By producing more complete renin-angiotensin system inhibition than with existing agents, direct renin inhibitors may afford greater protection from hypertensive complications. Other potential advantages include additional blood pressure reduction when used in combination therapy, a placebo-like side-effect profile, avid renal concentration, and long duration of action. Potential limitations include modest levels of blood pressure reduction that are equivalent to but not greater than angiotensin receptor blockers, reduced gastrointestinal absorption with a high-fat meal, and large reactive increases in renin secretion--the functional importance of which is under intense investigation. The results of outcomes trials are eagerly awaited.

Central sympatholysis as a novel countermeasure for cocaine-induced sympathetic activation and vasoconstriction in humans.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether cocaine's sympathomimetic actions can be reversed by a potent centrally acting alpha2 adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist (dexmedetomidine). BACKGROUND: We recently showed that cocaine stimulates the human cardiovascular system primarily by acting in the brain to increase sympathetic nerve activity (SNA), the neural stimulus to norepinephrine release. Thus, SNA constitutes a putative new drug target to block cocaine's adverse cardiovascular effects at their origin. METHODS: In 22 healthy cocaine-naïve humans, we measured skin SNA (microneurography) and skin blood flow (laser Doppler velocimetry) as well as heart rate and blood pressure before and after intranasal cocaine (2 mg/kg) alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine or saline. RESULTS: During intranasal cocaine alone, SNA increased by 2-fold and skin vascular resistance increased from 13.2 +/- 2.3 to 20.1 +/- 2.2 resistance units while mean arterial pressure increased by 14 +/- 3 mm Hg and heart rate by 18 +/- 3 beats/min (p < 0.01). Dexmedetomidine abolished these increases, whereas intravenous saline was without effect. Dexmedetomidine was effective in blocking these sympathomimetic actions of cocaine even in all 7 subjects who were homozygous for the Del322-325 polymorphism in the alpha2C AR, a loss-of-function mutation that is highly enriched in blacks. CONCLUSIONS: The data advance the novel hypothesis that central sympatholysis with dexmedetomidine constitutes a highly effective countermeasure for cocaine's sympathomimetic actions on the human cardiovascular system, even in individuals carrying the alpha2CDel322-325 polymorphism. (Study to Improve Scientific Understanding of the Cardiovascular Actions of Cocaine; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00338546?order=1; NCT00338546).

Effects of transdermal estrogen replacement therapy on cardiovascular risk factors.

The prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease increases dramatically after menopause in women, implicating estrogen as having a protective role in the cardiovascular system. However, recent large clinical trials have failed to show cardiovascular benefit, and have even demonstrated possible harmful effects, of opposed and unopposed estrogen in postmenopausal women. While these findings have led to a revision of guidelines such that they discourage the use of estrogen for primary or secondary prevention of heart disease in postmenopausal women, many investigators have attributed the negative results in clinical trials to several flaws in study design, including the older age of study participants and the initiation of estrogen late after menopause.Because almost all clinical trials use oral estrogen as the primary form of hormone supplementation, another question that has arisen is the importance of the route of estrogen administration with regards to the cardiovascular outcomes. During oral estrogen administration, the concentration of estradiol in the liver sinusoids is four to five times higher than that in the systemic circulation. This supraphysiologic concentration of estrogen in the liver can modulate the expression of many hepatic-derived proteins, which are not observed in premenopausal women. In contrast, transdermal estrogen delivers the hormone directly into the systemic circulation and, thus, avoids the first-pass hepatic effect.Although oral estrogen exerts a more favorable influence than transdermal estrogen on traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as high- and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels, recent studies have indicated that oral estrogen adversely influences many emerging risk factors in ways that are not seen with transdermal estrogen. Oral estrogen significantly increases levels of acute-phase proteins such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A; procoagulant factors such as prothrombin fragments 1+2; and several key enzymes involved in plaque disruption, while transdermal estrogen does not have these adverse effects.Whether the advantages of transdermal estrogen with regards to these risk factors will translate into improved clinical outcomes remains to be determined. Two ongoing clinical trials, KEEPS (Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study) and ELITE (Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol) are likely to provide invaluable information regarding the role of oral versus transdermal estrogen in younger postmenopausal women.

Epithelial sodium channel allele T594M is not associated with blood pressure or blood pressure response to amiloride.

The T594M allele of the epithelial sodium channel beta-subunit has been proposed as a gain-of-function mutation leading to salt-sensitive hypertension in blacks that is particularly responsive to the specific sodium channel antagonist amiloride. However, the positive associations derive from small convenience samples, and the amiloride challenge study lacked a control group. We determined whether the T594M allele was associated with hypertension and blood pressure (BP) response to amiloride in 2 well-characterized random population samples including 3137 Dallas County subjects and 1666 Jamaican blacks. In multivariate models, the T594M allele was not predictive of systolic BP (adjusted odds ratio for hypertension 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 1.8). Amiloride treatment did not lower the BP of 6 T594M heterozygotes significantly more than in 22 control subjects (P=0.8). We conclude that the T594M allele does not contribute significantly to BP in blacks and does not predict a significantly superior response to amiloride therapy.