RESUMO
Background: Limited real-world data are available in Europe, especially France, regarding the therapeutic management of anaemia in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD CKD). Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal, observational study was based on medical records from the MEDIAL database of not-for-profit dialysis units in France. From January to December 2016, we included eligible patients (≥18 years), with a diagnosis of CKD and receiving maintenance dialysis. Patients with anaemia were followed up for 2 years after inclusion. Patient demographic data, anaemia status, CKD-related anaemia treatments, and treatment outcomes including laboratory test results were evaluated. Results: Of 1632 DD CKD patients identified from the MEDIAL database, 1286 had anaemia; 98.2% of patients with anaemia were receiving haemodialysis at index date (ID). Of patients with anaemia, 29.9% had haemoglobin (Hb) levels of 10-11 g/dL and 36.2% had levels of 11-12 g/dL at ID. Furthermore, 21.3% had functional iron deficiency and 11.7% had absolute iron deficiency. The most commonly prescribed treatments at ID for patients with DD CKD-related anaemia were intravenous (IV) iron with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) (65.1%). Among patients initiating ESA treatment at ID or during follow-up, 347 (95.3%) reached the Hb target of 10-13 g/dL and maintained response within the target Hb range for a median duration of 113 days. Conclusions: Despite combined use of ESAs and IV iron, duration within the Hb target range was short, suggesting that anaemia management can be further improved.
RESUMO
The course of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) varies among individuals, with some reaching ESRD before 40 years of age and others never requiring RRT. In this study, we developed a prognostic model to predict renal outcomes in patients with ADPKD on the basis of genetic and clinical data. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1341 patients from the Genkyst cohort and evaluated the influence of clinical and genetic factors on renal survival. Multivariate survival analysis identified four variables that were significantly associated with age at ESRD onset, and a scoring system from 0 to 9 was developed as follows: being male: 1 point; hypertension before 35 years of age: 2 points; first urologic event before 35 years of age: 2 points; PKD2 mutation: 0 points; nontruncating PKD1 mutation: 2 points; and truncating PKD1 mutation: 4 points. Three risk categories were subsequently defined as low risk (0-3 points), intermediate risk (4-6 points), and high risk (7-9 points) of progression to ESRD, with corresponding median ages for ESRD onset of 70.6, 56.9, and 49 years, respectively. Whereas a score ≤3 eliminates evolution to ESRD before 60 years of age with a negative predictive value of 81.4%, a score >6 forecasts ESRD onset before 60 years of age with a positive predictive value of 90.9%. This new prognostic score accurately predicts renal outcomes in patients with ADPKD and may enable the personalization of therapeutic management of ADPKD.
