Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Modeling to Inform Risankizumab Dose Selection in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

Data from phase IIb/III and phase III studies were used to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of risankizumab and its exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination accurately described risankizumab pharmacokinetics. Although certain covariates, namely, body weight, serum albumin, fecal calprotectin, sex, corticosteroid use, advanced therapy inadequate response, and pancolitis, were statistically correlated with risankizumab clearance, their impact on exposure was not clinically meaningful for efficacy or safety. Phase II exposure-response analyses demonstrated that the 1,200 mg intravenous (IV) induction dose at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 achieved near maximal response for all efficacy end points, with suboptimal efficacy from the 600 mg and little added benefit from the 1,800 mg regimens, justifying 1,200 mg IV as the induction dose in the phase III study. Phase III exposure-response analyses for efficacy during induction showed statistically significant exposure-response relationships at Week 12 following 1,200 mg IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, in line with phase IIb results. Exposure-response analyses for maintenance demonstrated modest improvement in Week 52 efficacy when increasing the subcutaneous dose from 180 mg to 360 mg with largely overlapping confidence intervals. Exposure-response analyses for safety indicated no apparent exposure-dependent safety events over the induction or maintenance treatment. Based on these results, the recommended dosing regimen for risankizumab in UC patients is 1,200 mg IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, followed by 180 mg or 360 mg subcutaneously at Week 12 and every 8 weeks thereafter.

Integrating machine learning with pharmacokinetic models: Benefits of scientific machine learning in adding neural networks components to existing PK models.

Recently, the use of machine-learning (ML) models for pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling has grown significantly. Although most of the current approaches use ML techniques as black boxes, there are only a few that have proposed interpretable architectures which integrate mechanistic knowledge. In this work, we use as the test case a one-compartment PK model using a scientific machine learning (SciML) framework and consider learning an unknown absorption using neural networks, while simultaneously estimating other parameters of drug distribution and elimination. We generate simulated data with different sampling strategies to show that our model can accurately predict concentrations in extrapolation tasks, including new dosing regimens with different sparsity levels, and produce reliable forecasts even for new patients. By using a scenario of fitting PK data with complex absorption, we demonstrate that including known physiological structure into an SciML model allows us to obtain highly accurate predictions while preserving the interpretability of classical compartmental models.

Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Venetoclax in Patients Across Indications and Healthy Subjects from Phase 1, 2, and 3 Clinical Trials.

Following the decade-long clinical investigation, venetoclax has accrued pharmacokinetic (PK) data across multiple populations and widely ranging demographics, intrinsic, and extrinsic factors. We leveraged these rich data to systematically characterize venetoclax PK and assess covariate effects with population PK modeling. Plasma concentration-time data were pooled from 3016 subjects enrolled in 41 phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical studies, including patients from 9 indications and healthy volunteers. A nonlinear mixed-effect model was developed. Covariates were evaluated with full covariate modeling approach. A 2-compartment model with 3 transit absorption compartments described the data well. The impact of moderate and strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibition on apparent clearance (CL/F), female sex on apparent volume of distribution, food effect on relative bioavailability, and dose nonlinearity was confirmed. Newly identified covariate effects include 48% lower CL/F in subjects with severe hepatic impairment, 61% higher bioavailability in Asian subjects. When multiple CYP3A inhibitors are taken simultaneously, a 49% decrease in CL/F was estimated with multiple moderate inhibitors, more substantial than the 22% decrease of a single moderate inhibitor. An 85% decrease in CL/F was indicated when at least 1 strong CYP3A inhibitor was taken in combination, comparable to that of a single strong inhibitor. A venetoclax cross-indication population PK model with improved absorption-phase characterization was developed. Covariate analyses suggested lower CL/F for subjects with severe hepatic impairment and higher bioavailability in Asian subjects. Further decrease in CL/F was indicated when multiple moderate CYP3A inhibitors are present, compared to a single moderate inhibitor.

Assessing the Impact of Immunogenicity and Improving Prediction of Trough Concentrations: Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Adalimumab in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predicting adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK) for patients impacted by anti-drug antibodies (ADA) has been challenging. The present study assessed the performance of the adalimumab immunogenicity assays in predicting which patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have low adalimumab trough concentrations; and aimed to improve predictive performance of adalimumab population PK (popPK) model in CD and UC patients whose PK was impacted by ADA. METHODS: Adalimumab PK and immunogenicity data obtained from 1459 patients in SERENE CD (NCT02065570) and SERENE UC (NCT02065622) were analyzed. Adalimumab immunogenicity was assessed using electrochemiluminescence (ECL) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assays. From these assays, three analytical approaches (ELISA concentrations, titer, and signal-to-noise [S/N] measurements) were tested as predictors for classifying patients with/without low concentrations potentially affected by immunogenicity. The performance of different thresholds for these analytical procedures was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and precision-recall curves. Based on the results from the most sensitive immunogenicity analytical procedure, patients were classified into PK-not-ADA-impacted and PK-ADA-impacted subpopulations. Stepwise popPK modeling was implemented to fit the PK data to an empirical adalimumab two-compartment model with linear elimination and ADA delay compartments to account for the time delay to generate ADA. Model performance was assessed by visual predictive checks and goodness-of-fit plots. RESULTS: The classical ELISA-based classification (with 20 ng/mL ADA as lower threshold) showed a good balance of precision and recall, to determine which patients had at least 30% adalimumab concentrations below 1 µg/mL. Titer-based classification with the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) as threshold showed higher sensitivity to classify these patients compared to the ELISA-based approach. Therefore, patients were classified as PK-ADA-impacted or PK-not-ADA impacted using the LLOQ titer threshold. In the stepwise modeling approach ADA-independent parameters were first fit using PK data from titer-PK-not-ADA-impacted population. The identified ADA-independent covariates included the effect of indication, weight, baseline fecal calprotectin, baseline C-reactive protein, baseline albumin on clearance; and sex and weight on volume of distribution of the central compartment. Pharmacokinetic-ADA-driven dynamics were characterized using PK data for the PK-ADA-impacted population. The categorical covariate based on the ELISA classification was the best at describing the additional effect of immunogenicity analytical approaches on ADA synthesis rate. The model was able to adequately describe the central tendency and variability for PK-ADA-impacted CD/UC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ELISA assay was found to be optimal for capturing impact of ADA on PK. The developed adalimumab popPK model is robust in predicting PK profiles for CD and UC patients whose PK was impacted by ADA.

Opportunities and Challenges of Disease Progression Modeling in Drug Development - An IQ Perspective.

Disease progression modeling (DPM) represents an important model-informed drug development framework. The scientific communities support the use of DPM to accelerate and increase efficiency in drug development. This article summarizes International Consortium for Innovation & Quality (IQ) in Pharmaceutical Development mediated survey conducted across multiple biopharmaceutical companies on challenges and opportunities for DPM. Additionally, this summary highlights the viewpoints of IQ from the 2021 workshop hosted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Sixteen pharmaceutical companies participated in the IQ survey with 36 main questions. The types of questions included single/multiple choice, dichotomous, rank questions, and open-ended or free text. The key results show that DPM has different representation, it encompasses natural disease history, placebo response, standard of care as background therapy, and can even be interpreted as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling. The most common reasons for not implementing DPM as frequently seem to be difficulties in internal cross-functional alignment, lack of knowledge of disease/data, and time constraints. If successfully implemented, DPM can have an impact on dose selection, reduction of sample size, trial read-out support, patient selection/stratification, and supportive evidence for regulatory interactions. The key success factors and key challenges of disease progression models were highlighted in the survey and about 24 case studies across different therapeutic areas were submitted from various survey sponsors. Although DPM is still evolving, its current impact is limited but promising. The success of such models in the future will depend on collaboration, advanced analytics, availability of and access to relevant and adequate-quality data, collaborative regulatory guidance, and published examples of impact.

Bioavailability Evaluation of Venetoclax Lower-Strength Tablets and Oral Powder Formulations to Establish Interchangeability with the 100 mg Tablet.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Venetoclax is an approved BCL-2 inhibitor, currently under evaluation in different hematological malignancies in adult and pediatric populations. Venetoclax is available as 10, 50, and 100 mg tablets. To provide an alternative to patients who find taking the commonly prescribed 100 mg tablet a challenge, the interchangeability of lower-strength tablets with the 100 mg tablet was investigated. Additionally, newly developed oral suspension powder formulations to facilitate dosing in pediatrics were evaluated. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data from 80 healthy female participants from three phase I studies were utilized to evaluate the bioavailability of (1) 10 and 50 mg tablets relative to a 100 mg tablet; (2) 0.72 and 7.2% (drug to total weight) oral powder formulations relative to the 100 mg tablet; and (3) oral powder formulations administered using different vehicles (apple juice, apple sauce, and yogurt) relative to water under fed conditions. RESULTS: Bioavailability assessments at a 100 mg dose of venetoclax demonstrated bioequivalence across the 10, 50, and 100 mg tablet strengths. Oral powder formulations met the bioequivalence criteria (0.80-1.25) with respect to area under the concentration-time curve to time of the last measurable concentration (AUCt) and to infinite time (AUC∞) but exhibited a slightly lower maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Exposure-response analyses were utilized to demonstrate that the lower Cmax observed with the powder formulations is not clinically meaningful. The delivery vehicles tested did not affect the bioavailability of venetoclax oral powder formulations. CONCLUSIONS: The smaller-sized tablets (10 and 50 mg) and the newly developed oral powder formulations of venetoclax can be used interchangeably with the 100 mg tablets to improve the patients' experience, while maintaining adequate exposure. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIERS: NCT01682616, 11 September 2012; NCT02005471, 9 December 2013; NCT02242942, 17 September 2014; NCT02203773, 30 July 2014; NCT02287233, 10 November 2014; NCT02993523, 15 December 2016; NCT03069352, 3 March 2017.

Exposure-Response Model With Time-Varying Predictors to Estimate the Effects of Veliparib in Combination With Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and as Monotherapy: Veliparib Phase 3 Study in BRCA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer (BROCADE3) Trial.

BRCA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer (BROCADE3) is a phase 3 study, evaluating veliparib in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel with continuation as monotherapy if carboplatin/paclitaxel is discontinued in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation-associated, advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. The objective of the current analysis was to characterize the veliparib exposure-response relationships for efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS]) and safety in this study. Exposure-efficacy analyses of PFS were conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and cox proportional hazards (CPH) models using treatment alone or both treatment and exposure as time-dependent predictors to estimate the effect of veliparib in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and as monotherapy. The cox proportional hazards model with only treatment as the time-varying predictor estimated a statistically significant benefit of veliparib monotherapy compared to placebo monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.33-0.73) and a modest, non-statistically significant benefit (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95%CI, 0.62-1.05) of adding veliparib to carboplatin/paclitaxel. Inclusion of exposure as an additional time-varying predictor in the cox proportional hazards model indicated a flat exposure-response relationship between the veliparib exposure and PFS when veliparib was administered in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel or as monotherapy. The exposure-safety analysis did not reveal any meaningful exposure-dependent trend in the incidence of adverse events of interest. These analyses support the dose regimen of veliparib (120 mg twice daily) in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and continuation of veliparib (300-400 mg twice daily) as monotherapy if carboplatin/paclitaxel were discontinued before disease progression in this patient population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with a registration ID: NCT02163694.

Venetoclax exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships in patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

This study evaluated venetoclax population pharmacokinetics (popPK) in patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia and assessed the relationship between venetoclax exposure and clinical response for venetoclax in combination with either a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). A total of 771 patients who received venetoclax from 5 Phase 1-3 studies were included in the popPK model. Exposure-response analyses included data from 575 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus HMA and 279 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus LDAC. The popPK model successfully characterized venetoclax plasma concentrations over time and confirmed venetoclax exposure did not vary significantly with age, weight, sex, mild to moderate hepatic impairment, or mild to severe renal impairment. Asian patients had 67% higher mean relative bioavailability than non-Asian patients, however the range of exposures in Asian patients was similar to non-Asian patients. For all efficacy endpoints with both treatment combinations, efficacy was higher in the venetoclax treatment groups compared with the respective control arm of placebo plus azacitidine or LDAC. Within patients who received venetoclax, no significant exposure-efficacy relationships were identified for either treatment combination, indicating that the beneficial effects of venetoclax were already maximized in the dose ranges studied. There was no apparent effect of venetoclax exposure on treatment-emergent Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia or infections for either combination. Rates of treatment-emergent Grade ≥3 neutropenia were higher in the venetoclax treatment arms compared with the respective control arms; however, within patients who received venetoclax, there was only a shallow relationship or no apparent relationship with venetoclax exposure for venetoclax plus HMA or LDAC, respectively. Along with the efficacy and safety data previously published, the exposure-response analyses support the venetoclax dose regimens of 400 mg once daily (QD) plus HMA and 600 mg QD plus LDAC in treatment-naïve AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Meta-Analysis of Veliparib, a PARP Inhibitor, Across Phase 1/2/3 Trials in Cancer Patients.

Veliparib (ABT-888) is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in development for the treatment of high-grade ovarian cancer or BRCA-mutated breast cancer in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The population pharmacokinetics of veliparib were characterized using combined data from 1470 adult subjects with ovarian cancer, breast cancer, or other solid tumors enrolled in 6 phase 1 studies, 1 phase 2 study, and 2 phase 3 studies of veliparib oral doses of 10 to 400 mg twice daily as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. A 1-compartment model with linear clearance and first-order absorption best characterized veliparib pharmacokinetics. The predicted apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vc /F) were 479 L/day and 152 L, respectively. The significant covariates in the final model included albumin, creatinine clearance, strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, and sex on CL/F and albumin, body weight, and sex on Vc /F. Mild and moderate renal impairment increased veliparib median (95%CI) steady-state AUC (AUCss ) by 27.3% (23.7%-30.9%) and 65.4% (56.0%-75.5%), respectively, compared with normal renal function. Male subjects had 16.5% (7.53%-23.9%) lower AUCss compared with female subjects and coadministration with strong CYP2D6 inhibitors increased AUCss by 13.0% (6.11%-20.8%). Race, age, region, cancer type, or enzyme (CYP3A4, CYP2C19) or transporter (P-glycoprotein, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2, organic cation transporter 2) inhibiting/inducing comedications were not found to significantly impact veliparib pharmacokinetics. Other than baseline creatinine clearance and hence renal impairment effect on veliparib clearance, no other covariates had a clinically meaningful effect on veliparib exposure warranting dose adjustment.

Model Informed Dosing Regimen and Phase I Results of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Budigalimab (ABBV-181).

Budigalimab is a humanized, recombinant, Fc mutated IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor, currently in phase I clinical trials. The safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and budigalimab dose selection from monotherapy dose escalation and multihistology expansion cohorts were evaluated in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors who received budigalimab at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W) in dose escalation, including Japanese patients that received 3 and 10 mg/kg Q2W. PK modeling and PK/PD assessments informed the dosing regimen in expansion phase using data from body-weight-based dosing in the escalation phase, based on which patients in the multihistology expansion cohort received flat doses of 250 mg Q2W or 500 mg every four weeks (Q4W). Immune-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11 of 59 patients (18.6%), of which 1 of 59 (1.7%) was considered grade ≥ 3 and the safety profile of budigalimab was consistent with other PD-1 targeting agents. No treatment-related grade 5 AEs were reported. Four responses per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported in the dose escalation cohort and none in the multihistology expansion cohort. PK of budigalimab was approximately dose proportional and sustained > 99% peripheral PD-1 receptor saturation was observed by 2 hours postdosing, across doses. PK/PD and safety profiles were comparable between Japanese and Western patients, and exposure-safety analyses did not indicate any trends. Observed PK and PD-1 receptor saturation were consistent with model predictions for flat doses and less frequent regimens, validating the early application of PK modeling and PK/PD assessments to inform the recommended dose and regimen, following dose escalation.

Integrated Mechanistic Model of Minimal Residual Disease Kinetics With Venetoclax Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important emerging clinical end point in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The objective of this research was to develop an integrated mechanistic model to evaluate the impact of venetoclax-rituximab combination therapy on MRD kinetics. Using data from 435 patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, an integrated model was developed and validated that accounted for venetoclax dosing and pharmacokinetics, rituximab treatment, absolute lymphocyte count, and blood and bone marrow (BM) MRD data. Simulations of venetoclax-rituximab (six cycles) combination predicted the proportion (90% confidence interval) of patients with BM MRD below 10-4 to be 57% (54-61%) and 63% (59-67%) at 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. Continued venetoclax treatment to 48 months only increased the predicted rate of negative BM MRD to 66% (63-70%). These results indicate that treatment with venetoclax-rituximab combination for a finite 2-year period would nearly maximize the rate of negative BM MRD (< 10-4 ). Preliminary clinical data agree with these predictions and more long-term follow-up data are awaited to confirm the same.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in HCV-infected Japanese Subjects in Phase 3 CERTAIN-1 and CERTAIN-2 Trials.

Glecaprevir (GLE)/pibrentasvir (PIB) 300 mg/120 mg once daily (Mavyret/Maviret) is an all-oral, pangenotypic, interferon- and ribavirin-free combination regimen approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The objective of the current analyses was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GLE/PIB in HCV-infected Japanese patients. Data from 332 subjects enrolled in 2 Japan phase 3 trials, CERTAIN-1 and CERTAIN-2, were used in the analyses. Pharmacokinetics of GLE/PIB were characterized using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The analyses evaluated the impact of covariates (concomitant medications and demographic and clinical covariates such as renal impairment, effect of cirrhotic status) on GLE/PIB PK. GLE and PIB PK were described by 1- and 2-compartment models, respectively. Presence of cirrhosis, age, and body weight were identified as significant covariates on GLE/PIB PK. A trend toward higher GLE and PIB exposures in older patients and higher PIB exposures in heavier patients was observed; however, these increases were not considered clinically meaningful. GLE and PIB exposures were higher in HCV-infected subjects with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A; GLE area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 160% higher, and PIB area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 21% higher) compared to subjects without cirrhosis. Renal function (including subjects with end-stage renal disease with dialysis) had no impact on GLE or PIB exposures. The GLE/PIB dose was well tolerated in the Japanese population, and no dose adjustment is needed for the evaluated intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

Exposure-response analysis to inform the optimal dose of veliparib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Veliparib, a poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 enzyme inhibitor, was administered at 120 mg twice daily (BID) for 7 days in a 21-day cycle with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the Phase 2 BROCADE study in patients with BRCA-deficient recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, a dose based on Phase 1 results. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response analyses were undertaken to retrospectively evaluate whether an optimal dose was used in BROCADE. METHODS: A population PK analysis was performed using data from 168 patients in BROCADE along with data from 288 subjects in another 5 studies. The relationship between veliparib exposure and efficacy variables (including progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate [ORR]) and safety variables (selected grade 3 or greater hematological adverse events) were analyzed. RESULTS: Veliparib PK parameters in BROCADE were comparable to the previous studies. Creatinine clearance on veliparib apparent clearance and lean body weight on veliparib apparent volume of distribution were identified as covariates. A trend of better efficacy (PFS and ORR) in the veliparib arm compared to placebo was observed. However, veliparib exposure-efficacy response was relatively flat with higher veliparib exposures not showing better efficacy. No exposure-response relationship was observed in grade 3 or greater hematological toxicities (anemia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia). CONCLUSIONS: The exposure-response analysis suggested that intermittent 7-day veliparib 120 mg BID dosing in a 21-day cycle provided additional efficacy without meaningfully impacting the safety and tolerability when co-administered with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with BRCA-deficient breast cancer. A higher dose of veliparib is unlikely to provide greater benefit in this combination in patients with BRCA-deficient recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Model-Informed Dosing of Venetoclax in Healthy Subjects: An Exposure-Response Analysis.

Venetoclax is an approved drug for the treatment of some hematological malignancies. Venetoclax can cause reduction in B-lymphocyte counts as an on-target effect. The purpose of this analysis is to quantify the relationship between venetoclax exposure and B-lymphocyte levels to inform dosing of venetoclax in healthy subjects. Data were pooled from 10 studies in healthy subjects with venetoclax doses ranging from 10 mg to 400 mg and food ranging from fasting to high-fat meals. Venetoclax pharmacokinetics (PK) was characterized in 203 subjects using a population approach, as implemented in NONMEM version 7.3 (Icon Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD, USA). A semimechanistic pharmacodynamic (PD) model with a linear drug effect was fit to the B-lymphocyte data to determine the exposure-response relationship. The population PK and PD model described the observed data adequately. The 200 and 400 mg doses were shown to reduce the B-lymphocyte levels by 24% (15-35%) and 38% (25-54%), respectively. B-lymphocytes recovered to normal levels within an average of 48 (21-64) days and 59 (30-66) days, respectively, with 200 and 400 mg doses. Venetoclax can be safely administered in healthy subjects. The PK-PD model characterized the relationship between venetoclax exposure and reduction in B-lymphocytes and will help design future venetoclax studies in healthy subjects.

Optimizing venetoclax dose in combination with low intensive therapies in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: An exposure-response analysis.

The objective of this research was to characterize the venetoclax exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships and determine its optimal dose in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving venetoclax in combination with low intensity therapies (hypomethylating agent [HMA; azacitidine or decitabine] or low-dose cytarabine [LDAC]). A total of 212 patients from the HMA study and 92 patients from the LDAC study were included in the exposure-safety analyses. Those who received at least one dose of venetoclax and had at least one measurable response (201 and 83 in the HMA and LDAC studies, respectively) were included in the exposure-efficacy analyses. The probability of response based on International Working Group (IWG) for AML response criteria, adverse events of grade 3 or worse neutropenia or infection or a serious adverse event was modeled using logistic regression analyses to characterize the venetoclax exposure-response relationships. In combination with an HMA, increasing concentrations of venetoclax, up to those associated with a less than or equal to 400-mg once daily (QD) dose, were associated with a higher probability of response, with a trend for flat or decreasing probabilities of response thereafter. In combination with LDAC, increasing concentrations of venetoclax were associated with higher probabilities of response, with no plateau observed. Increasing concentrations of venetoclax were not associated with increasing probability of any safety event except for a slight increase in grade 3 or worse infections with HMAs; however, tolerability issues were observed at doses of greater than or equal to 800 mg QD in each study. Exposure-response analyses support the use of venetoclax 400 mg QD in combination with an HMA and 600 mg QD in combination with LDAC (ie, the next highest dose evaluated below 800 mg in each combination) to safely maximize the probability of response in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML.

An Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic Model Versus Individual Models of Depatuxizumab Mafodotin, an Anti-EGFR Antibody Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Solid Tumors Likely to Overexpress EGFR.

Depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) designed for the treatment of tumors expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), consisting of a veneered "humanized" recombinant IgG1κ antibody that has binding properties specific to a unique epitope of human EGFR with noncleavable maleimido-caproyl linkers each attached to a potent antimitotic cytotoxin, monomethyl auristatin F. We aimed to describe the development and comparison of 2 population pharmacokinetic modeling approaches. Data from 2 phase 1 studies enrolling patients with glioblastoma multiforme or advanced solid tumors were included in the analysis. Patients in these studies received doses of depatux-m ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mg/kg as monotherapy, in combination with temozolomide, or radiation plus temozolomide depending on the study and/or arm. First, an integrated ADC model to simultaneously describe the concentration-time data for ADC, total antibody, and cys-mafodotin was built using a 2-compartment model for ADC for each drug-to-antibody ratio. Then, 3 individual models were developed for ADC, total antibody, and cys-mafodotin separately using 2-compartment models for ADC and total antibody and a 1-compartment model for cys-mafodotin. Visual predictive checks suggested accurate model fitting across a range of concentrations. The analysis showed that both an integrated complex ADC model and the individual models that have shorter computational time would result in similar outcomes.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Paritaprevir, Ombitasvir, Dasabuvir, Ritonavir, and Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Cirrhotic and Non-cirrhotic Patients: Analyses Across Nine Phase III Studies.

BACKGROUND: The clinical development program of the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combination therapy of paritaprevir (coadministered with ritonavir) and ombitasvir, with and without dasabuvir (3-DAA [3D] and 2-DAA [2D] regimens, respectively) used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection has generated a robust dataset across various dosing regimens and patient populations. OBJECTIVE: The current analysis aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics in patients without cirrhosis ('non-cirrhotic') and with compensated cirrhosis ('cirrhotic'), while accounting for differences across hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GT) 1, 2, and 4, multiple regimens (3D regimen ± ribavirin for GT1 in global studies, 2D regimen for subgenotype 1b in Japan, 2D regimen + ribavirin for GT2 in Japan, and 2D regimen + ribavirin for GT4), and ethnicities. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data from nine clinical studies (~ 1850 patients) were used to model the population pharmacokinetics of each component of the DAA regimens. Model development was performed in stages, starting with an initial base model. Covariate-parameter relationships were then assessed using forward inclusion/backward elimination procedures. Model development was guided by goodness-of-fit plots, likelihood ratio tests, plausibility of parameter estimates, and knowledge of DAA, ritonavir, and ribavirin pharmacokinetics. Paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were described by a one-compartment model, while dasabuvir and ribavirin pharmacokinetics were characterized by a two-compartment model. RESULTS: The analysis showed generally overlapping exposures between compensated cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients or between subgroups of the identified significant covariates. The largest differences were the approximately 30-60% higher dasabuvir and paritaprevir exposures in compensated cirrhotic patients. CONCLUSION: These differences did not warrant dose adjustments for the DAAs when used in HCV-infected patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Exposure-response evaluations of venetoclax efficacy and safety in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Exposure-response analyses were performed for a venetoclax monotherapy study in 106 patients with varying subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (NCT01328626). Logistic regression, time-to-event, and progression-free survival (PFS) analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between venetoclax exposure, NHL subtype and response, PFS, or occurrence of serious adverse events. Trends for small increases in the probability of response with increasing venetoclax exposures were identified, and became more evident when assessed by NHL subtype. Trends in exposure-PFS were shown for the mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) subtype, but not other subtypes. There was no increase in the probability of experiencing a serious adverse event with increasing exposure. Overall, the results indicate that venetoclax doses of 800-1200 mg as a single agent may be appropriate to maximize efficacy in MCL, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes with no expected negative impact on safety.

Application of Exposure-Response Analyses to Establish the Pharmacodynamic Similarity of a Once-Daily Regimen to an Approved Twice-Daily Dosing Regimen for the Treatment of HCV Infection.

The triple direct-acting antiviral (3-DAA) regimen (two co-formulated tablets of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir once daily and one tablet of dasabuvir twice daily) for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection has been reformulated for once-daily administration containing all three active DAAs (3QD regimen). Two bioequivalence studies compared the 3-DAA and 3QD regimens. In study 1, fed, single-, and multiple-dose crossover comparisons revealed exposures for drug components that were slightly outside the bioequivalence criteria, i.e., 21 to 29% lower dasabuvir C trough, paritaprevir C max, and ritonavir C max. In study 2, fed and fasted single-dose crossover comparisons demonstrated a large impact of food on exposures, confirming the product's labeling requirement for administration only with food, and revealed a lack of bioequivalence under fasting conditions. Exposure-response analyses using efficacy data from phase 2/3 studies of the 3-DAA regimen demonstrated that the lower dasabuvir C trough for the 3QD regimen (under fed condition) would have minimal impact on sustained virologic response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12). Thus, the pharmacodynamic similarity between the regimens was established and the analyses provided the basis for regulatory approval of the 3QD regimen to treat patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection.