Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ketamine versus ketamine and behavioural activation therapy for adults with treatment-resistant depression in the community.

INTRODUCTION: Although short-term benefits follow parenteral ketamine for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TR-MDD), there are challenges that prevent routine use of ketamine by clinicians. These include acute dissociative effects of parenteral ketamine, high relapse rates following ketamine dosing and the uncertain role of psychotherapy. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) seeks to establish the feasibility of evaluating repeated oral doses of ketamine and behavioural activation therapy (BAT), compared with ketamine treatment alone, for TR-MDD. We also aim to compare relapse rates between treatment arms to determine the effect size of adding BAT to oral ketamine. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospectively registered, two-centre, single-blind RCT. We aim to recruit 60 participants with TR-MDD aged between 18 and 65 years. Participants will be randomised to 8 weeks of oral ketamine and BAT, or 8 weeks of oral ketamine alone. Feasibility will be assessed by tracking attendance for ketamine and BAT, acceptability of treatment measures and retention to the study follow-up protocol. The primary efficacy outcome measure is the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) measured weekly during treatment and fortnightly during 12 weeks of follow-up. Other outcome measures will assess the tolerability of ketamine and BAT, cognition and activity (using actigraphy). Participants will be categorised as non-responders, responders, remitters and relapsed during follow-up. MADRS scores will be analysed using a linear mixed model. For a definitive follow-up RCT study to be recommended, the recruitment expectations will be met and efficacy outcomes consistent with a >20% reduction in relapse rates favouring the BAT and ketamine arm will be achieved. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the New Zealand Central Health and Disability Ethics Committee (reference: 2023 FULL18176). Study findings will be reported to participants, stakeholder groups, conferences and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UTN: U1111-1294-9310, ACTRN12623000817640p.

Prescription of sodium valproate to women of childbearing potential in Southern District Mental Health Services in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the adherence to guidelines in the prescription of sodium valproate (SV) to women of childbearing potential (WOCP) in Southern District Mental Health Services (SMHS) in New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: Electronic records of women aged 18-54 who were newly prescribed SV by SMHS between the 1st of January 2018 and the 31st of December 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Documentation of the following criteria was examined: pre-commencement pregnancy test, education education on the teratogenic potential of SV and/or the importance of avoiding unplanned pregnancy, information on contraception, and the rationale for prescribing SV over alternative treatments. RESULTS: Among the 3065 WOCP who had contact with SMHS during the study period, 51 women were newly prescribed SV and at risk of pregnancy. Twenty-one women (41%) had a recorded reason for prescribing SV over alternative treatments, four women (8%) underwent a pre-commencement pregnancy test, 10 women (20%) received information about the teratogenic potential of SV and/or the importance of avoiding unplanned pregnancy, and 21 women (41%) had documentation regarding contraception. CONCLUSION: The study findings indicate heterogeneous and suboptimal documentation of specific risks associated with SV use in WOCP in SMHS. Interventions are needed to improve prescribing and documentation practices.