Enamel matrix derivative promotes new bone formation in xenograft assisted maxillary anterior ridge preservation-A randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen alone (DBBMC) or with enamel matrix derivative (DBBMC-EMD) in ridge preservation. METHODS: 42 maxillary anterior teeth were extracted and received either a DBBMC (control) or DBBMC-EMD (test) treatment protocol. CBCT taken before and 4 months after the extraction procedure was used to measure changes in alveolar ridge width (RW), buccal bone height (BH) and palatal bone height (PH). Bone cores were harvested during implant osteotomy preparation, and the samples processed histomorphometrically to assess the fraction of new bone (%NB), residual graft (%RG) and soft tissue matrix (%STM). RESULTS: Overall, both treatment groups showed significant reductions in mean RW from baseline to 4 months after extraction, but no significant change in either mean BH or PH over this time. When CBCT measurements were analysed according to the initial thickness of the buccal wall (BT < 1 mm vs. BT ≥ 1 mm), significant reductions in all ridge dimensions (RW, BH and PH) were noted in the <1 mm BT group. Histomorphometrically, the DBBMC-EMD test group showed significantly increased new bone formation (%NB): (control = 16.5 ± 6.9% cf.; test = 45.1 ± 8.8%) with less residual graft (%RG): (control = 36.8 ± 8.8% cf.; test = 20.3 ± 7.2%) compared to the DBBMC control group. CONCLUSIONS: Both DBBMC alone and DBBMC-EMD treated sites 4 months after extraction lost RW but showed no significant change in BH or PH. Irrespective of treatment, maxillary anterior teeth with thick initial buccal walls (≥1 mm) exhibited less alveolar ridge reduction 4 months after treatment. The addition of EMD to DBBMC resulted in more new bone formation in the test group.

Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of multiple Class III-IV recessions in lower anterior teeth: A 3-year randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study compared clinical and patient-centered outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) with and without enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of multiple Class III-IV Miller periodontal recession (REC) defects on mandibular anterior teeth. METHODS: This randomized clinical study evaluated 41 patients at 3 years follow-up. One hundred and fifty-six teeth were divided into two groups: test (CTG-EMD, 79 teeth) and control (CTG only, 77 teeth). Clinical REC, keratinized tissue (KT) width, percentage of root coverage, patient-centered outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 36 months follow-up, patient level analysis showed that REC in the test group reduced significantly (5.71 ± 0.58 mm to 1.57 ± 0.85 mm) compared with the control group (5.94 ± 0.46 mm to 2.51 ± 0.62 mm) (P < 0.001), while KT width increased in the test group (1.51 ± 0.26 mm to 4.18 ± 0.34 mm) and was significantly greater than the control group (1.65 ± 0.21 mm to 2.90 ± 0.20 mm) (P < 0.001). At 36 months, tooth level analysis (Class III and Class IV groups) found less residual REC and increased KT in the test group compared with the control group (P < 0.01). Significantly less pain was reported at 2, 7, and 14 days follow-up post-surgery in the test group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of EMD to CTG results in improved root coverage outcomes and higher amounts of KT width 36 months after treatment of Class III-IV REC on mandibular anterior teeth. The adjunctive use of EMD also resulted in significantly reduced pain 14 days post-surgery.

A 3-year prospective clinical and patient-centered trial on subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative in Class I-II Miller recessions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The study compared clinical and patient-centered outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) with and without enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of Class I-II Miller periodontal recession defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective clinical study evaluated 80 patients over a 3 years follow-up in a private periodontal practice. A total of 144 maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were divided into two groups: group 1 (CTG with EMD-80 teeth) and group 2 (CTG only-64 teeth). Recession (REC), keratinized tissue (KT) width, % root overage, patient-centered outcomes, and pain visual analog scale (P-VAS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 3 years follow-up at a patient level, statistically significant changes in REC were achieved in both group 1 (4.65 ± 1.84 to 0.39 ± 0.19 mm) and group 2 (4.43 ± 1.11 to 0.92 ± 0.43 mm). Complete root coverage (CRC) was achieved in 66.4% of group 1 and 50.1% of group 2. At both patient and tooth level, the 3-year outcomes were superior for group 1 compared with group 2 in terms of % root coverage, REC, and KT width. Clinical attachment loss (CAL) was reduced in group 1 compared with group 2 at the tooth level analysis only (<.01). Significantly less pain was reported using the pain visual analog Scale (P < .001) at the two weeks follow-up post-surgery in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of EMD results in improved root coverage outcomes and higher amounts of keratinized tissue width 36 months after treatment of multiple adjacent recessions on maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. The adjunctive use of EMD also resulted in significantly reduced pain 14 days after the surgery.

Regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen, enamel matrix derivative and Doxycycline-A prospective 3-year cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: There is limited evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate a combination therapy of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBMC), enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and Doxycycline in the regeneration of bone defects associated with peri-implantitis. METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis (BoP/suppuration, probing depth greater than 4 mm, minimum radiographic bone loss of 20%, at least 2 years in function) were enrolled in the study. Clinical measurements included probing depths, recession, radiographic bone fill, gingival inflammation and bleeding on probing/suppuration. Following surgical access and debridement, the implant surfaces were decontaminated with 24% EDTA for 2 min, and the bone defects were filled with a combined mixture of DBBMC, EMD and Doxycycline powder. The defects were covered with connective tissue grafts where necessary. Clinical measurements were recorded after 12, 24 and 36 months. RESULTS: The mean probing depth and bone loss at the initial visit was 8.9 mm (±1.9) and 6.92 mm (±1.26), respectively. Both mean probing depth and bone loss reduced significantly from baseline to 3.55 mm (±0.50) and 2.85 mm (±0.73) at 12 months, 3.50 (±0.50) and 2.62 mm (±0.80) at 24 months and 3.50 mm (±0.50) and 2.60 mm (±0.73) at 36 months. 56.6% of the implants were considered successfully treated (according to Successful Treatment Outcome Criterion: PD < 5 mm, no further bone loss >10%, no BoP/suppuration, no recession >0.5 mm for anterior implants and >1.5 mm for posterior implants) after 36 months. CONCLUSION: Regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis using a combined mixture of DBBMC, EMD and Doxycycline achieved promising results. The benefits of this protocol incorporating EMD should be tested in randomized clinical trials.

Periodontal Referral Patterns in Australia: 2000 Versus 2015.

BACKGROUND: A previous study investigated differences in the severity of periodontal disease on referral for specialist care between 1980 and 2000 across the United States. The present study finds patients referred in 2000 had greater severity of periodontal disease than those referred 20 years ago. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 384 charts was completed from three periodontal practices across the east coast of Australia. Two time periods were investigated: 2000 to 2001 and 2015 to 2016. From these charts, the following data were recorded: 1) age; 2) sex; 3) smoking status; 4) number of missing teeth; and 5) number of teeth planned for extraction as part of a treatment plan at initial examination. Additionally, degree of periodontal severity was determined and recorded. The classification system was based on that used by the previous study, wherein case Types I to IV defined increasing severity of periodontal disease, and Type V defined referrals for needs other than periodontal disease (e.g., crown lengthening and implants). RESULTS: Overall, patients seen in 2015 presented with a greater percentage of Type IV and Type V cases. Smoking prevalence reduced significantly across the three locations between the two time periods. No consistent or noteworthy trends were identified with regard to number of missing teeth or number of teeth planned for extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the results of a similar previous study, there appears to be a trend for more severe periodontal conditions being referred to periodontists. This is concerning given that more severe periodontal conditions tend to be more difficult to manage conservatively and reliably.