Establishing a priori and a posteriori predictive models to assess patients' peak skin dose in interventional cardiology. Part 2: results of the VERIDIC project.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing patient exposure in interventional cardiology is key to avoid skin injuries. PURPOSE: To establish predictive models of peak skin dose (PSD) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO), and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 534 PCI, 219 CTO, and 209 TAVI were collected from 12 hospitals in eight European countries. Independent associations between PSD and clinical and technical dose determinants were examined for those procedures using multivariate statistical analysis. A priori and a posteriori predictive models were built using stepwise multiple linear regressions. A fourfold cross-validation was performed, and models' performance was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R²), and linear correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis proved technical parameters to overweight clinical complexity indices with PSD mainly affected by fluoroscopy time, tube voltage, tube current, distance to detector, and tube angulation for PCI. For CTO, these were body mass index, tube voltage, and fluoroscopy contribution. For TAVI, these parameters were sex, fluoroscopy time, tube voltage, and cine acquisitions. When benchmarking the predictive models, the correlation coefficients were r = 0.45 for the a priori model and r = 0.89 for the a posteriori model for PCI. These were 0.44 and 0.67, respectively, for the CTO a priori and a posteriori models, and 0.58 and 0.74, respectively, for the TAVI a priori and a posteriori models. CONCLUSION: A priori predictive models can help operators estimate the PSD before performing the intervention while a posteriori models are more accurate estimates and can be useful in the absence of skin dose mapping solutions.

Review of skin dose calculation software in interventional cardiology.

PURPOSE: In interventional cardiology, patients may be exposed to high doses to the skin resulting in skin burns following single or multiple procedures. Reviewing and analysing available software (online or offline) may help medical physicists assessing the maximum skin dose to the patient together with the dose distribution during (or after) these procedures. METHOD AND RESULTS: Capabilities and accuracy of available software were analysed through an extensive bibliography search and contacts with both vendor and authors. Their markedly differed among developers. In total, 22 software were identified and reviewed according to their algorithms and their capabilities. Special attention was dedicated to their main features and limitations of interest for the intended clinical use. While the accuracy of the 12 software products validated with measurements on phantoms was acceptable (within ± 25%), the agreement was poor for the two products validated on patients (within ± 43% and ± 76%, respectively). In addition, no software has been validated on angiographic units from all manufacturers, though several software developers claimed vendor-independent transportability. Only one software allows for multiple procedures dose calculation. CONCLUSION: Large differences among vendors made it clear that work remains to be done before an accurate and reliable skin dose mapping is available for all patients.

Radiation Dose to the Fetus From Computed Tomography of Pregnant Patients-Development and Validation of a Web-Based Tool.

OBJECTIVE: Estimations of radiation dose absorbed by the fetus from computed tomography (CT) in pregnant patients is mandatory, but currently available methods are not feasible in clinical routine. The aims of this study were to develop and validate a tool for assessment of fetal dose from CT of pregnant patients and to develop a user-friendly web interface for fast fetal dose calculations. METHODS: In the first study part, 750 Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed on phantoms representing pregnant patients at various gestational stages. The MC code simulating vendor-independent dose distributions was validated against CT dose index (CTDI) measurements performed on CT scanners of 2 vendors. The volume CTDI-normalized fetal dose values from MC simulations were used for developing the computational algorithm enabling fetal dose assessments from CT of various body regions at different exposure settings. In the institutional review board-approved second part, the algorithm was validated against patient-specific MC simulations performed on CT data of 29 pregnant patients (gestational ages 8-35 weeks) who underwent CT. Furthermore, the tool was compared with a commercially available software. A user-friendly web-based interface for fetal dose calculations was created. RESULTS: Weighted CTDI values obtained from MC simulations were in excellent agreement with measurements performed on the 2 CT systems (average error, 4%). The median fetal dose from abdominal CT in pregnant patients was 2.7 mGy, showing moderate correlation with maternal perimeter (r = 0.69). The algorithm provided accurate estimates of fetal doses (average error, 11%), being more accurate than the commercially available tool. The web-based interface (www.fetaldose.org) enabling vendor-independent calculations of fetal doses from CT requires the input of gestational age, volume CTDI, tube voltage, and scan region. CONCLUSIONS: A tool for fetal dose assessments from CT of pregnant patients was developed and validated being freely available on a user-friendly web interface.

Occupational Exposure of the Eye Lens in Interventional Procedures: How to Assess and Manage Radiation Dose.

Occupational exposure from interventional x-ray procedures is one of the areas in which increased eye lens exposure may occur. Accurate dosimetry is an important element to investigate the correlation of observed radiation effects with radiation dose, to verify the compliance with regulatory dose limits, and to optimize radiation protection practice. The objective of this work is to review eye lens dose levels in clinical practice that may occur from the use of ionizing radiation. The use of a dedicated eye lens dosimeter is the recommended methodology; however, in practice it cannot always be easily implemented. Alternatively, the eye lens dose could be assessed from measurements of other dosimetric quantities or other indirect parameters, such as patient dose. The practical implementation of monitoring eye lens doses and the use of adequate protective equipment still remains a challenge. The use of lead glasses with a good fit to the face, appropriate lateral coverage, and/or ceiling-suspended screens is recommended in workplaces with potential high eye lens doses.

Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H p (3) monitoring. A 2015 review.

A thorough literature review about the current situation on the implementation of eye lens monitoring has been performed in order to provide recommendations regarding dosemeter types, calibration procedures and practical aspects of eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel. Most relevant data and recommendations from about 100 papers have been analysed and classified in the following topics: challenges of today in eye lens monitoring; conversion coefficients, phantoms and calibration procedures for eye lens dose evaluation; correction factors and dosemeters for eye lens dose measurements; dosemeter position and influence of protective devices. The major findings of the review can be summarised as follows: the recommended operational quantity for the eye lens monitoring is H p (3). At present, several dosemeters are available for eye lens monitoring and calibration procedures are being developed. However, in practice, very often, alternative methods are used to assess the dose to the eye lens. A summary of correction factors found in the literature for the assessment of the eye lens dose is provided. These factors can give an estimation of the eye lens dose when alternative methods, such as the use of a whole body dosemeter, are used. A wide range of values is found, thus indicating the large uncertainty associated with these simplified methods. Reduction factors from most common protective devices obtained experimentally and using Monte Carlo calculations are presented. The paper concludes that the use of a dosemeter placed at collar level outside the lead apron can provide a useful first estimate of the eye lens exposure. However, for workplaces with estimated annual equivalent dose to the eye lens close to the dose limit, specific eye lens monitoring should be performed. Finally, training of the involved medical staff on the risks of ionising radiation for the eye lens and on the correct use of protective systems is strongly recommended.