Admission Norton scale scores (ANSS) correlate with rehabilitation outcome and length in elderly patients following hip arthroplasty.

We sought to determine if ANSS used for evaluating pressure sore risk also correlate with rehabilitation outcome and length following hip arthroplasty in elderly patients. This was a retrospective study conducted in a geriatric rehabilitation department during 2009. ANSS, admission albumin serum levels, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores, discharge walking functional independence measure (FIM) scores, and rehabilitation length were studied. The final cohort included 201 patients: 160 (79.6%) females and 41 (20.4%) males. Mean age was 82.7±6.5 years. Mean discharge walking FIM score was 5.2±0.9. Mean length of rehabilitation was 19.9±7.8 days. ANSS correlated with discharge walking FIM scores (r=0.28; p=0.002), and with length of rehabilitation (r=-0.22; p=0.014) following adjustment for age, admission albumin serum levels, and MMSE scores. Linear regression analysis showed that ANSS were associated with the discharge walking FIM scores (p<0.0001) and rehabilitation length (p=0.027) independent of age, admission albumin serum levels, gender, type of hip surgery, and the appearance of pressure sores. We conclude that the Norton scoring system may be used for predicting the outcome and the duration of rehabilitation in elderly patients following hip arthroplasty.

Clock Drawing Test-Modified and Integrated Approach (CDT-MIA): description and preliminary examination of its validity and reliability in dementia patients referred to a specialized psychogeriatric setting.

The authors developed a scoring system for clock drawing, based on modification and integration of 3 established scoring methods. The Clock Drawing Test-Modified and Integrated Approach (CDT-MIA) is a 4-step, 20-item instrument, with a maximum score of 33, which emphasizes differential scoring of contour, numbers, hands, and center. It was administered to 139 patients (93 with and 46 without dementia). Dementia patients revealed significantly more impairment on the CDT-MIA total score and hours and hands subscores. Correlations between CDT-MIA and 2 CDTs were high. With receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, the area constructed under CDT-MIA curve was large. The best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for CDT-MIA was the cut-point 23 (91% and 80%, respectively). The internal consistency of CDT-MIA was high, and there was a high degree of interrater reliability. Thus, CDT-MIA was found to be a valid and reliable evaluation instrument for dementia patients in a specialized setting.