RESUMO
Many articles concerning conventional Pap smears, ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) and Hybrid-Capture II HPV test (HC II) have been published. This study, carried out by the French Society of Clinical Cytology, may be conspicuous for several reasons: it was financially independent; it compared the efficiency of the conventional Pap smear and LBC, of the conventional Pap smear and HC II, and included an economic study based on real costs; for all the women, a "gold standard" reference method, colposcopy, was available and biopsies were performed whenever a lesion was detected; The conventional Pap smear, the LBC (split-sample technique), the colposcopy, and the biopsies were done at the same time. This study included 2,585 women shared into two groups: a group A of a high-risk population, a group B of a screening population. The statistical analysis of the results showed that conventional Pap smears consistently had superior or equivalent sensitivity and specificity than LBC for the lesions at threshold CIN-I (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia) or CIN-II or higher. It underlined the low specificity of the HC II. Finally, the LBC mean cost was never covered by the Social Security tariff.
Assuntos
Teste de Papanicolaou , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Esfregaço Vaginal/economia , Adulto , Biópsia/economia , Biópsia/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , França , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologiaRESUMO
This paper is part of the cost-effectiveness study of cervical cancer screening conducted by the French Society of Clinical Cytology (SFCC). It describes the evaluation of costs of conventional smear tests, thin-layer smear tests (ThinPrep 2000 system), and viral typing by the HCS test. For 100,000 examinations per year, the average cost of a conventional smear test is 11.53 dollars in a private anatomo-pathology clinic. The cost of the thin-layer test for the same number of examinations and in the same type of clinic is 13.93 dollars. For 20,000 annual tests, the average cost of human papillomavirus (HPV) is 23.43 dollars in the public sector and 23.48 dollars in the private one. The higher price of the thin-layer method is only justifiable if this screening technique outperforms the conventional method. Furthermore, the high cost of the HPV test means that its integration into a population-based screening program must be carefully defined.
