[Impact of the "daily huddle" on the safety of pediatric hospitalized patients]. / Impacto de los «daily huddle¼ en la seguridad del paciente pediátrico hospitalizado.

INTRODUCTION: In 2017, the Joint Commission proposed daily meetings called "huddle" as an indicator of quality of care. They are brief daily meetings of the multidisciplinary team, where security problems of the last 24h are shared and risks are anticipated. The objectives were to describe the most frequent safety events in Pediatric wards, implement improvements in patient safety, improve team communication, implement international safety protocols, and measure the satisfaction of the staff involved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, longitudinal and analytical design (June 2020-February 2022), with previous educational intervention. Safety incidents, data related to unequivocal identification, allergy and pain records, data from the Scale for the Early Detection of Deficiencies (SAPI) and the Scale for the Secure Transmission of Information (SBAR) were collected. The degree of satisfaction of the professionals was evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight security incidents were recorded. Medication prescription or administration errors stood out (n=103). Drug prescription or administration errors stood out (n=103), especially those related to high-risk medication: acetaminophen (n=14) (×10 doses of acetaminophen; n=6), insulin (n=6), potassium (n=5) and morphic (n=5). An improvement was observed in the pain record; 5% versus 80% (P<.01), in the SAPI registry 5% versus 70% (P<.01), in SBAER scale 40% vs 100% (P<.01), in unequivocal identification of the patient 80% versus 100%; (P<.01) and in the application of analgesic techniques 60% versus 85% (P=.01). In the survey of professionals, a degree of satisfaction of 8 (7-9.5)/10 was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Huddles made it possible to learn about security events in our environment and increase the safety of hospitalized patients, and improved communication and the relationship of the multidisciplinary team.

[Evaluation of the effectiveness of a procedure for identifying patients with allergy in paediatric emergency rooms]. / Evaluación de la efectividad de un procedimiento de identificación de pacientes con alergia en urgencias pediátricas.

INTRODUCTION: Correct identification of the patient with an allergy is critical for patient safety, since it involves a potential risk of a serious adverse event (AE). Our Emergency Pediatric department has an integrated quality management and risk management system focused on the continuous improvement of patient care quality and safety, which incident reporting system could identified a potential risk arising from the registration of allergies in new computer softwares. As a safety barrier, an allergy identification procedure was implemented, using a sticker placed on the identification bracelet (RED: allergy; WHITE: non-allergies). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted to evaluate, by direct observation, the correct identification of patients with allergy using this new protocol. The reports of incidents related to this procedure were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 342 patients included, 327 (95.6% (95%:93.4-97.8%)) were correctly identified. Identification errors were most common in the group of patients with allergies [10 of 45; 22.2% (95%:10.1-34.4%) than in the non-allergic group: 5 of 297; 1.7% (95%:0.2-3.2); p<0.001)]. No AEs were reported. 2 quasi-incidents detected before reaching the patient were reported thanks of the protocol application. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is a useful safety barrier and can be easily exported to other units. Further work is needed to promote the professional's adherence to the protocol and improve the correct identification of the patient with allergy.