Virtual family-centered hospital rounds in the neonatal intensive care unit: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Family-centered rounds is recognized as a best practice for hospitalized children, but it has only been possible for children whose families can physically be at the bedside during hospital rounds. The use of telehealth to bring a family member virtually to the child's bedside during hospital rounds is a promising solution. We aim to evaluate the impact of virtual family-centered hospital rounds in the neonatal intensive care unit on parental and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial will randomize families of hospitalized infants to have the option to use telehealth for virtual hospital rounds (intervention) or usual care (control). The intervention-arm families will also have the option to participate in hospital rounds in-person or to not participate in hospital rounds. All eligible infants who are admitted to this single-site neonatal intensive care unit during the study period will be included. Eligibility requires that there be an English-proficient adult parent or guardian. We will measure participant-level outcome data to test the impact on family-centered rounds attendance, parent experience, family-centered care, parent activation, parent health-related quality of life, length of stay, breastmilk feeding, and neonatal growth. Additionally, we will conduct a mixed methods implementation evaluation using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. DISCUSSION: The findings from this trial will increase our understanding about virtual family-centered hospital rounds in the neonatal intensive care unit. The mixed methods implementation evaluation will enhance our understanding about the contextual factors that influence the implementation and rigorous evaluation of our intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05762835. Status: Not yet recruiting. First posted: March 10, 2023; last update posted: March 10, 2023.

Virtual Family-Centered Rounds in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Family-centered rounds is recognized as a best practice for hospitalized children, but it has only been possible for children whose families can physically be at the bedside during hospital rounds. The use of telehealth to bring a family member virtually to the child’s bedside during rounds is a promising solution. We aim to evaluate the impact of virtual family-centered rounds in the neonatal intensive care unit on parental and neonatal outcomes. Methods: This two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial will randomize families of hospitalized infants to have the option to use telehealth for virtual rounds (intervention) or usual care (control). The intervention-arm families will also have the option to participate in rounds in-person or to not participate in rounds. All eligible infants who are admitted to this single-site neonatal intensive care unit during the study period will be included. Eligibility requires that there be an English-proficient adult parent or guardian. We will measure participant-level outcome data to test the impact on family-centered rounds attendance, parent experience, family-centered care, parent activation, parent health-related quality of life, length of stay, breastmilk feeding, and neonatal growth. Additionally, we will conduct a mixed methods implementation evaluation using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Discussion: The findings from this trial will increase our understanding about virtual family-centered rounds in the neonatal intensive care unit. The mixed methods implementation evaluation will enhance our understanding about the contextual factors that influence the implementation and rigorous evaluation of our intervention. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05762835. Status: Not yet recruiting. First Posted: 3/10/2023; Last Update Posted: 3/10/2023.

Pediatric Musculoskeletal Coccidioidomycosis in Central California: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Published literature on musculoskeletal coccidioidomycosis is sparse and limited to case reports and case series. This is one of the largest case series to describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis, medical and surgical management and outcomes of pediatric musculoskeletal coccidioidomycosis at a tertiary care hospital. METHOD: A retrospective case review was performed on patients ≤ 21 years old who were followed at a tertiary care center with a diagnosis of musculoskeletal coccidioidomycosis from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020. Descriptive data are expressed as medians and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables or as frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Categorical values were compared using the χ2 test. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were identified. The median age was 12.8 years, and most were male (71%), Latinx (66%) and healthy (71%). Limb swelling (66%), bone pain (54%) and joint pain (46%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Multiple bone involvement was present in 29% while 12% had the joint disease, and craniofacial (n = 10) and metacarpal/metatarsal bones (n=9) were the most commonly involved sites. Elevated Coccidioides complement fixation (CF) titers ≥1:32 were seen in 90% of the patients. Thirty-three patients (81%) required surgical interventions and of these 16 (48%) required additional surgical procedures. Eleven patients (27%) had disease relapse. Children >13 years of age were more likely to have > 1 organ involvement (16 vs. 7, P = 0.04), multiple bone involvement (10 vs. 2, P = 0.004) and maximum Coccidioides CF titers >1:128 (13 vs. 6, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In endemic areas, musculoskeletal coccidioidomycosis causes a substantial disease burden in children and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of those presenting with bone and joint pain or swelling. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to minimize long-term morbidity and mortality.

Complex Monteggia fracture in a 5 year old.

Monteggia fractures comprise a small subset of fractures in the pediatric population that are normally reduced nonoperatively. Complex Monteggia fractures can be more difficult to identify and require operative intervention. We describe a case of a Bado type I Monteggia fracture with a posteriorly dislocated radial head and neck fracture that has not been described before in the literature. The patient required advanced imaging because of ossification delays and led to an operative intervention to reduce the radial head and neck. This case exemplifies how irreducible Monteggia fractures may necessitate advanced imaging to determine blocks to a successful reduction.