Virtual psychoeducation for improvement of pain catastrophizing in pediatric presurgical patients and caregivers: a proof-of-concept study.

PURPOSE: Pain catastrophizing (PC) is the tendency to magnify the threat value of pain sensations and is associated with greater postsurgical pain intensity, functional disability, and pain chronicity. Higher parental PC predicts higher chronic postsurgical pain in youth. Treating PC in caregivers and youth prior to surgery may improve recovery and surgical outcomes. We developed and evaluated a psychoeducational workshop addressing PC for presurgical youth and their parents/caregivers. We hypothesized that parent/caregiver and youth PC scores would decrease over time. We also explored preintervention levels of youth anxiety and depression as moderators of outcome. METHODS: Youth (n = 43) and caregivers (n = 41) attended a virtual, group-based single-session intervention (SSI). Single-session intervention content addressed pain neuroscience, PC, and adaptive coping strategies for managing pain and PC drawn from cognitive-behavioural, acceptance and commitment, and dialectical behaviour therapy approaches. Participants completed questionnaires assessing PC at preintervention, postintervention, and two weeks postsurgery. Youth mood and anxiety were assessed at preintervention. RESULTS: Caregiver PC scores decreased from pre- to postintervention (P = 0.006), and this was maintained at postsurgery (P = 0.002). Youth PC scores decreased from preintervention to postsurgery, but only for those with higher preintervention anxiety (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results provide proof-of-concept support for a virtual SSI targeting caregivers and youth PC during the perioperative period. The present findings highlight the possible need to screen presurgical candidates for symptoms of anxiety. Replication with larger and more diverse samples, and a more robust design are warranted.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le terme de dramatisation de la douleur décrit la tendance à amplifier la valeur de menace des sensations de douleur et est associée à une plus grande intensité de la douleur postopératoire, à une incapacité fonctionnelle et à une chronicité de la douleur. Une dramatisation parentale plus élevée de la douleur prédit une douleur postopératoire chronique plus élevée chez les jeunes. Le traitement de la dramatisation de la douleur chez les soignant·es et les jeunes avant la chirurgie peut améliorer le rétablissement et les devenirs chirurgicaux. Nous avons mis au point et évalué un atelier psychoéducatif sur la dramatisation de la douleur destiné aux jeunes en période préchirurgicale et à leurs parents/soignant·es. Nous avons émis l'hypothèse que les scores de dramatisation de la douleur des parents/soignant·es et des jeunes diminueraient avec le temps. Nous avons également exploré les niveaux d'anxiété et de dépression des jeunes avant l'intervention en tant qu'éléments modérateurs des résultats. MéTHODE: Des jeunes (n = 43) et les personnes en prenant soin (n = 41) ont participé à une seule intervention virtuelle en groupe. Le contenu de l'intervention unique portait sur les neurosciences de la douleur, la dramatisation de la douleur et les stratégies d'adaptation pour la prise en charge de la douleur et la dramatisation de la douleur tirées des approches cognitivo-comportementales, d'acceptation et d'engagement, et de thérapie comportementale dialectique. Les participant·es ont rempli des questionnaires évaluant la dramatisation de la douleur avant l'intervention, après l'intervention et deux semaines après la chirurgie. L'humeur et l'anxiété des jeunes ont été évaluées avant l'intervention. RéSULTATS: Les scores de dramatisation de la douleur des soignant·es ont diminué de la période précédant à la période suivant l'intervention (P = 0,006), et cela s'est maintenu après la chirurgie (P = 0,002). Les scores de dramatisation de la douleur des jeunes ont diminué de la période précédant l'intervention à la période postchirurgie, mais seulement chez les jeunes présentant une anxiété pré-intervention plus élevée (P = 0,01). CONCLUSION: Nos résultats appuient la preuve de concept pour une intervention virtuelle unique ciblant la dramatisation de la douleur chez les soignant·es et les jeunes en période périopératoire. Ces résultats soulignent la nécessité potentielle de dépister les symptômes d'anxiété chez les candidat·es avant la chirurgie. La réplication avec des échantillons plus grands et plus diversifiés et une conception plus robuste est justifiée.

A Quality Improvement Project on Pain Management at a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.

To assess and improve pain management practices for hospitalized children in an urban tertiary pediatric teaching hospital. METHODS: Health Quality Ontario Quality Improvement (QI) framework informed this study. A pre (T1) - post (T2) intervention assessment included chart reviews and children/caregiver surveys to ascertain pain management practices. Information on self-reported pain intensity, painful procedures, pain treatment and satisfaction were obtained from children/caregivers. Documented pain assessment, pain scores, and pharmacological/non-pharmacological pain treatments were collected by chart review. T1 data was fed back to pediatric units to inform their decisions and pain management targets. RESULTS: At T1, 51 (58% of eligible participants) children/caregivers participated. At T2, 86 (97%) chart reviews and 51 (54%) children/caregivers surveys were completed. Most children/caregivers at T1 (78%) and T2 (80%) reported moderate to severe pain during their hospitalization. A mean of 2.6 painful procedures were documented in the previous 24 h, with the most common being needle-related procedures at both T1 and T2. Pain management strategies were infrequently used during needle-related procedures at both time points. CONCLUSION: No improvements in pain management as measured by the T1 and T2 data occurred. Findings informed further pain management initiatives in the participating hospital.

Is it feasible to implement a rapid recovery pathway for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in a single-payer universal health care system?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to determine if it is feasible to implement a rapid recovery pathway (RRP) for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) within a single-payer universal healthcare system while simultaneously decreasing length of stay (LOS) without increasing post-operative complications. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was completed for all patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS at a tertiary children's hospital in Canada between March 2010 and February 2019, with date of implementation of the RRP being March 1st, 2015. Patient demographic information was collected along with a variety of outcome variables including: LOS, wound complication, infection, 30-day return to the OR, 30-day emergency department visit, and 30-day hospital readmission. An interrupted time series analysis was utilized to determine if any benefits were associated with the implementation of the RRP. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were identified, with 113 patients in the conventional pathway and 131 in the RRP. No significant differences in demographic features or post-operative complications were found between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). Using a robust linear time series model, LOS was found to be significantly shorter in the RRP group, with the average LOS being 5.2 [95% IQR 4.3-6.1] days in the conventional group and 3.4 [95% IQR 3.3-3.5] days in the RRP group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that it is possible to implement a RRP for the surgical treatment of AIS within a single-payer universal healthcare system. Use of the pathway can effectively reduce hospital LOS without increasing the risk of developing a post-operative complication. This has the upside potential to reduce healthcare and family costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Pediatric emergence delirium: Canadian Pediatric Anesthesiologists' experience.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric emergence agitation/delirium (ED) is a cluster of behaviors seen in the early postanesthetic period with negative emotional consequences for families and increased utilization of healthcare resources. Many studies have looked at identifying risk factors for ED and at pharmacologic regimens to prevent ED. There are few published reports on treatment options and efficacy for established ED episodes, and essentially no data concerning current practice in the treatment of ED. We sought to elicit the experience and opinions of Canadian Pediatric Anesthesiologists on the incidence of ED in their practice, definitions and diagnostic criteria, preventative strategies, treatments, and their perceived efficacy. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to pediatric anesthesiologists working at academic health science centers across Canada. The participants were selected based on being members of the Canadian Pediatric Anesthesia Society (CPAS), which represents the subspecialty in Canada. All members of CPAS who had e-mail contact information available in the membership database were invited to participate. A total of 209 members out of the total of 211 fulfilled these criteria and were included in the study population. RESULTS: The response rate was 51% (106/209). Of respondents, 42% felt that ED was a significant problem at their institutions, with 45% giving medication before or during anesthesia to prevent the development of ED. Propofol was the most common medication given to prevent ED (68%) and to treat ED (42%). Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was considered by 38% of respondents as a technique used to prevent ED. Medications used for treatment included propofol (42%), midazolam (31%), fentanyl (10%), morphine (7%), and dexmedetomidine (5%), with 87% of respondents rating effectiveness of treatment as 'usually works quickly with one dose'. DISCUSSION: We present information on current practice patterns with respect to prophylaxis and treatment of ED among a specialized group of pediatric anesthesiologists and highlight the importance of further research in improving the treatment of this common and challenging peri-anesthetic occurrence.