Assessment of PSA responses and changes in the rate of tumor growth (g-rate) with immune checkpoint inhibitors in US Veterans with prostate cancer.

We examined data from US Veterans with prostate cancer (PC) to assess disease response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy or combined with abiraterone or enzalutamide to assess ICI efficacy in the real-world. We queried the VA corporate data warehouse (CDW) to identify Veterans with a diagnosis of PC who received ICI for any malignancy and had ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving ICI. To evaluate ICI monotherapy, we restricted analysis to Veterans who had not received LHRH agonists/antagonists, PC-directed medical therapy, or radiation/extirpative surgery of the bladder/prostate within and preceding the duration of ICI administration. For ICI combination analysis, we identified Veterans who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for PC while on ICI. We calculated rates of tumor (PSA) growth (g-rates), comparing them to a 1:2 matched reference cohort. We identified 787 Veterans with PC and ≥1 PSA measurement while receiving an ICI. Median duration of ICI therapy was 155 days. 223 Veterans received ICI monotherapy, with only 17(8%) having a reduction in PSA (median decline = 43%). 12 (5%) had PSA declines >30% (PSA30) which included 6 (3%) who had PSA reductions greater than 50% (PSA50). Median g-rates for ICI plus abiraterone (n = 20) or enzalutamide (n = 31) were 0.000689/d-1 and 0.002819/d-1, respectively, and were statistically insignificant compared to g-rates of matched cohorts receiving abiraterone (g = 0.000925/d-1, P = 0.73) or enzalutamide (g = 0.001929/d-1, P = 0.58) alone. Our data align with clinical trial data in PC, demonstrating limited benefit from ICI monotherapy and predicting no survival benefit from simultaneous abiraterone or enzalutamide with an ICI using g-rate.

Minimal Residual Disease-Adapted Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Current Evidence and Opinions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with relatively uniform treatment paradigms. This review aims to assess the growing role of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessment in facilitating response-adapted therapeutic decision making to individualize therapy in MM. RECENT FINDINGS: MRD has been repeatedly demonstrated to provide strong prognostic information, superseding traditional IMWG response criteria. The use of MRD to modulate therapy remains controversial. Here, we review the existing landscape of MRD-adapted trial designs in both induction/consolidation and maintenance settings, including recent data from influential studies and retrospective analyses. We navigate existing data, leverage the increased resolution of longitudinal MRD assessments, and comment on trials in progress to explain our current utilization of MRD in the clinic. MRD transcends traditional response assessments by providing a window into disease-treatment interaction over time. As a strong patient-level surrogate, MRD has limited current use in individualizing treatment, but is poised to comprehensively shape treatment strategies at many key points in a patient's MM course.