RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies describe poor follow-up among children in ophthalmology prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the pandemic led to worse adherence for routine medical care in children, little information exists on pediatric ophthalmology follow-up adherence during COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on follow-up adherence for children with eye disease, and identified characteristics associated with follow-up adherence. METHODS: In this single-center study, the medical records of 519 new pediatric (≤18 years of age) patients seen during January, April, August, and December 2019 and 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were classified into two groups: adherent (patients who followed up within 30 days of recommended appointment time) or less-adherent (patients who followed up >30 days after recommended follow-up or never). Main outcome measure was patient adherence status. RESULTS: Follow-up adherence was similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (50.4% for 2019 and 49.6% for 2021 [P = 0.40]). Patients that were less likely to be adherent in both univariate and multivariable analyses included those with public insurance (adjusted OR = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.40-1.00]; P = 0.05), and those recommended to follow-up ≥3 months (adjusted OR ≤ 0.10; P < 0.001). In addition, in univariate analysis, those who declined to self-report race (OR = 0.53 [95% CI, 0.29-0.95]; P = 0.04) and those seen by optometrists (OR = 0.42 [95% CI, 0.29-0.60]; P < 0.001) were less likely to be adherent, while patients who traveled ≥177 miles to their provider were more likely to be adherent (OR = 2.88 [95% CI, 1.17-7.55]; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up adherence for childhood eye care was low but remained relatively stable before and during the COVID-19 pandemic; >50% of children were less-adherent.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and performance of Vivid Vision Perimetry (VVP), a new virtual reality (VR)-based visual field platform. METHODS: Children 7-18 years of age with visual acuity of 20/80 or better undergoing Humphrey visual field (HVF) testing were recruited to perform VVP, a VR-based test that uses suprathreshold stimuli to test 54 field locations and calculates a fraction seen score. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate correlation between HVF mean sensitivity and VVP mean fraction seen scores. Participants were surveyed regarding their experience. RESULTS: A total of 37 eyes of 23 participants (average age, 12.9 ± 3.1 years; 48% female) were included. All participants successfully completed VVP testing. Diagnoses included glaucoma (12), glaucoma suspect (7), steroid-induced ocular hypertension (3), and craniopharyngioma (1). Sixteen participants had prior HVF experience, and none had prior VVP experience, although 7 had previously used VR. Of the 23 HVF tests performed, 9 (39%) were unreliable due to fixation losses, false positives, or false negatives. Similarly, 35% of VVP tests were unreliable (as defined by accuracy of blind spot detection). Excluding unreliable HVF tests, the correlation between HVF average mean sensitivity and VVP mean fraction seen score was 0.48 (P = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.09-0.74). When asked about preference for the VVP or HVF examination, all participants favored the VVP, and 70% were "very satisfied" with VVP. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of 23 pediatric subjects, VVP proved to be a clinically feasible VR-based visual field testing, which was uniformly preferred over HVF.
