Point prevalence surveys of antimicrobial use in adult inpatients at Canterbury District Health Board Hospitals.

AIMS: To determine the nature and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in adult inpatients at Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB). METHODS: Multidisciplinary teams collected clinical details for all adult inpatients on antimicrobial therapy at three CDHB facilities (~1,100 beds) and made standardised assessments based on the Australian National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (http://naps.org.au) against local guidelines and national funding criteria. RESULTS: Antimicrobial therapy was prescribed to 42% of inpatients (322/760), usually to treat infections [377/480 prescriptions (79%)], with amoxicillin+clavulanic acid the agent most commonly prescribed [72/480 prescriptions (15%)]. Of assessable prescriptions, 74% (205/278) were guideline compliant, 98% (469/480) were funding criteria compliant, and 83% (375/451) were appropriate clinically. Prescriptions for the most common indications-surgical prophylaxis [66/480 (14%)] and community-acquired pneumonia [56/480 (12%)]-were often non-compliant with guidelines (32% and 41%, respectively) and inappropriate (18% and 21%, respectively). Overall, the indication was documented in 353/480 (74%) prescriptions, the review/stop date documented in 145/480 (30%) prescriptions, and surgical prophylaxis stopped within 24 hours in 53/66 (80%) prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Most antimicrobial prescriptions were appropriate and complied with guidelines. Compliance with key quality indicators (indication documented, review/stop date documented, and surgical prophylaxis ceased within 24 hours) were well below target (>95%) and needs improvement.

A persuasive approach to antimicrobial stewardship in Christchurch hospitals produced a sustained decrease in intravenous clarithromycin dosing and expenditure via a switch to azithromycin orally.

AIMS: To assess a persuasive multimodel approach to decreasing unnecessary intravenous (IV) clarithromycin use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) hospitals. METHODS: In December 2013, CDHB guidelines for empiric treatment of CAP changed to prioritise oral azithromycin over IV clarithromycin. The multimodel approach we used to implement this change included obtaining stakeholder agreement, improved guidelines access, education and pharmacist support. The impact of the intervention was evaluated by comparing macrolide usage and expenditure for the four years pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Mean annual clarithromycin IV use decreased by 72% from 6.4 to 1.8 defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 occupied bed days (OBDs) post-intervention, while oral azithromycin increased by 833% (4.2 to 39.2 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs). Concurrently, oral clarithromycin use decreased by 91% (32.9 to 2.9 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs), and roxithromycin by 71% (17.0 to 5.0 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs). Mean annual total macrolide use decreased by 21% (68.2 to 53.9 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs), while expenditure decreased by 69% mainly through avoided IV administration. CONCLUSIONS: A persuasive multimodel approach to support adoption of CAP guidelines produced a sustained decrease in IV clarithromycin use, which may have clinical benefits such as reduced occurrence of catheter-related complications.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in Christchurch: 18 years on.

AIM: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has become an established option for management infections requiring intravenous therapy. As the uptake of OPAT has increased, the clinical governance has changed and is now managed via virtual clinics and increased use of district nurses in addition to specialist outpatient review. The aim of this study was to report the characteristics, diagnoses, treatment and outcomes of patients managed by the service over 12 months in 2015/6 and compared these features with those of patients treated with OPAT in 1999. METHODS: Cases for 2015/6 were identified from the OPAT service database which records prospectively all information on diagnosis, antibiotic choice and duration of treatment, complications and requirement for review by the ID physicians and OPAT nurses prospectively. The outcomes, complications and readmissions were found by reviewing computerised records of Christchurch Hospital. All results were entered into a Microsoft® Excel database for analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using OpenEpi software. Data for 1999 was taken from an earlier publication. RESULTS: OPAT treatment in 12 months from 1 July 2015 was administered 407 times to 385 patients, which represented a 2.7 times increase in treatment courses than in 1999. The median age was 55 years in 1999 and 61 in 2015/6. There was a substantial increase in the proportion of bone and joint, abdominal and urinary tract infections but a fall in cellulitis and soft tissue infection. The number and proportion of patients treated with broad spectrum agents including piperacillin + tazobactam, ceftriaxone and carbapenems increased from 1% in 1999 to 20% in 2015/6. Unplanned readmission to hospital increased from 15 (10%) in 1999 to 62 patients (15%) in 2015/6. The most common reason for readmission in 2015/6 was for ongoing symptoms or progression of the infection requiring OPAT. Eight patients (2%) required readmission from adverse reactions to antimicrobial therapy. Two patients on palliative care died while on OPAT and 35 (9%) within 12 months of the index admission. CONCLUSION: OPAT use has increased and is used to treat patients with comorbidities, who are older, and with a different case-mix than 1999. Safety has not been compromised but the risk of treatment failure has increased. A better understanding of the reasons for treatment failure would improve patient selection and management with OPAT.

Antimicrobial stewardship practice in New Zealand's rural hospitals.

AIMS: We aimed to describe how antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is practised in New Zealand's diverse rural hospital network. METHODS: Rural hospital medical practitioners were surveyed to estimate the utilisation of prescribing resources and specialist support for AMS, and attitudes towards AMS. Questions reflected recommended strategies for AMS programmes. RESULTS: The response rate was 80.8% (122/151) from 29 rural hospitals (3-114 beds). While 78.7% reported access to local antimicrobial prescribing guidelines, discordant answers from practitioners at the same institution were common. The practice of approval for access to broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents was uncommon. Most respondents had cared for a patient with a multi-drug resistant organism in the preceding 12 months. Only 34.8% of respondents reported receiving formal education on AMS principles, with at least 90% believing it was relevant irrespective of the clinical context considered. Respondents were more likely to believe that antimicrobial overuse and resistance were more relevant at sites distant from the context of rural hospital practice. CONCLUSION: While AMS is perceived as relevant for rural hospital medicine, many of the building blocks of AMS systems are absent in this environment. This presents an opportunity for development as AMS strategies evolve in New Zealand.

Metronidazole stewardship initiative at Christchurch hospitals-achievable with immediate benefits.

AIMS: To evaluate an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiative to change hospital prescribing practice for metronidazole. METHODS: In October 2015, the Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) AMS committee changed advice for metronidazole to promote two times daily dosing for most indications, prioritisation of the oral route and avoidance of double anaerobic cover. Adoption of the initiative was facilitated via change in prescribing guidelines, education and ongoing pharmacy support. Usage and expenditure on metronidazole for adult inpatients were compared for the five years pre- and two years post-change. Other district health boards (DHBs) were surveyed to determine their dosing recommendation for metronidazole IV. RESULTS: Mean annual metronidazole IV use, as defined daily doses per 1,000 occupied bed days, decreased by 43% post-initiative. Use of non-IV (oral or rectal) formulations increased by 104%. Total savings associated with the initiative were approximately $33,400 in drug costs plus $78,200 per annum in IV giving sets and post-dose flushes. Twelve of 20 (60%) DHBs (including CDHB) endorse twice daily IV dosing. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to financial savings, reduction in IV doses has potential benefits, including avoidance of IV catheter-associated complications such as bloodstream infections. Approaches to metronidazole dosing vary across DHBs and could benefit from national coordination.