Interplay between probe design and test performance: overlap between genomic regions of interest, capture regions and high quality reference calls influence performance of WES-based assays.

Whole exome sequencing (WES)-based assays undergo rigorous validation before being implemented in diagnostic laboratories. This validation process generates experimental evidence that allows laboratories to predict the performance of the intended assay. The NA12878 Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) HapMap reference sample is commonly used for validation in diagnostic laboratories. We investigated what data points should be taken into consideration when validating WES-based assays using the GIAB reference in a diagnostic setting. We delineate specific factors that require special consideration and identify OMIM genes associated with diseases that may 'bypass' validation. Four replicates of the NA12878 sample were sequenced at the CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory on a NextSeq 500; the data were analyzed using the bcbio_nexgen v1.1.2 pipeline. The hap.py validation engine, Real Time Genomics vcfeval tool, and high confidence (HC) variant calls in HC regions available for the GIAB sample were used to validate the obtained variant calls. The same validation process was then used to evaluate variant calls obtained for the same sample by two other clinical diagnostic laboratories. We showed that variant calls in NA12878 can be confidently measured only in the regions that intersect between the GIAB HC regions and the target regions of exome capture. Of the 4139 (as of October 2019) OMIM genes associated with a phenotype and having a known molecular basis of disease, 84 were fully outside of the GIAB HC regions and many of the remaining OMIM genes were only partially covered by the HC regions. A significant proportion of variants identified in the NA12878 sample outside of the HC regions have unknown (UNK) status due to the absence of HC reference alleles. Verification of such calls is possible either by an alternative truth set or by orthogonal testing. Similarly, many variants outside of exome capture regions, if not accounted for, will be deemed false negatives due to insufficient probe coverage. Our results demonstrate the importance of the intersection between genomic regions of interest, capture regions, and the high confidence regions. If not considered, false and ambiguous variant calls could have a negative impact on diagnostic accuracy of the intended WES-based diagnostic assay and increase the need for confirmatory testing. To enable laboratories to identify 'problematic' regions and optimize validation efforts, we have made our VCF and BED files available in UCSC Genome Browser: NA12878 WES Benchmark. Relevant genes and genome annotations are evolving, we implemented a general purpose algorithm to cross-reference OMIM genes with the genomic regions of interest that can be applied to capture genes/regions outside HC regions (see repository of data material section).

Genetic Diagnostic Testing for Inherited Cardiomyopathies: Considerations for Offering Multi-Gene Tests in a Health Care Setting.

Inherited cardiomyopathies (ICs) are a major cause of heart disease. Given their marked clinical and genetic heterogeneity, the content and clinical utility of IC multi-gene panels has been the topic of continuous debate. Our genetics diagnostic laboratory has been providing clinical diagnostic testing for ICs since 2012. We began by testing nine genes and expanded our panel by fivefold in 2015. Here, we describe the implementation of a cost-effective next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay for testing of IC genes, including a protocol that minimizes the amount of Sanger sequencing required to confirm variants identified by NGS, which reduces the cost and time of testing. The NGS assay was developed for the simultaneous analysis of 45 IC genes and was assessed for the impact of panel expansion on variant detection, turnaround time, and cost of testing in a cohort of 993 patients. The assay led to a considerable reduction in test cost and turnaround time. However, only a marginal increase was observed in the diagnostic yield, whereas the rate of inconclusive findings increased considerably. These findings suggest that the ongoing evaluation of gene content and monitoring of clinical utility for multi-gene tests are essential to achieve maximum clinical utility of multi-gene tests in a publicly funded health care setting.

Reinterpretation of sequence variants: one diagnostic laboratory's experience, and the need for standard guidelines.

PurposeThe advent of next-generation sequencing resulted in substantial increases in the number of variants detected, interpreted, and reported by molecular genetics diagnostic laboratories. Recent publications have provided standards for the interpretation of sequence variants, but there are currently no standards regarding reinterpretation of these variants. Recognizing that significant changes in variant classification may occur over time, many genetics diagnostic laboratories have independently developed practices for variant reinterpretation. The purpose of this study is to describe our laboratory approach to variant reinterpretation.MethodsWe surveyed eight genetics diagnostic laboratories in Canada and the United States.ResultsEach laboratory had differing protocols, but most felt that clinically relevant changes to variant classifications should be communicated to ordering providers. Based on results of this survey and our experience, we developed a cost-effective and resource-efficient approach to variant reinterpretation.ConclusionOngoing variant reinterpretation is required to maintain the highest standards for delivering genetics laboratory services. Our approach to variant reinterpretation offers an efficient solution that does not compromise accuracy or timely delivery of genetics laboratory services.

Peer Observed Interaction and Structured Evaluation (POISE): a Canadian experience with peer supervision for genetic counselors.

Peer observation, while often used in other professions, has not been formally applied in genetic counseling. The objective of this study was to pilot a method of peer evaluation whereby genetic counselors observed, and were observed by, each other during patient interaction. All of the available genetic counselors participated in both rounds of the pilot study (six in round one, seven in round two). The genetic counselors that observed the session used an observation room. Most participants reported learning a new skill. Sensitivity to, and comfort with, the feedback process improved. We conclude that Peer-Observed Interaction and Structured Evaluation (POISE) provides an opportunity to refresh counseling approaches and develop feedback skills without causing undue team discord. This new approach to peer supervision in genetic counselling offers a live observation approach for genetic counsellor supervision.