[Vaccination status and factors associated with pneumococcal vaccination in geriatric short-stay care]. / Statut vaccinal et facteurs associés à la vaccination antipneumococcique en court séjour gériatrique.

Nearly two-thirds of geriatric short-stay patients were eligible for pneumococcal vaccination. Among patients eligible for vaccination, less than 5 % had received at least one injection of pneumococcal vaccine on admission. We found no modifiable factors associated with vaccination status, but several avenues for improving vaccination coverage.

Implementation of clinical medication review in a geriatric ward to reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions among older adults.

PURPOSE: The impact of several pharmaceutical interventions to reduce the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potentially omitted medications (POMs) has been recently studied. We aimed to determine whether clinical medication review (CMR) (i.e. a systematic and patient-centred clinical assessment of all medicines currently taken by a patient) performed by a geriatrician and a pharmacist added to standard pharmaceutical care (SPC) (i.e. medication reconciliation and regular prescription review by the pharmacist) resulted in more appropriate prescribing compared to SPC among older inpatients. METHODS: A retrospective observational single-centre study was conducted in a French geriatric ward. Six criteria for appropriate prescribing were chosen: the number of PIMs and POMs as defined by the STOPP/STARTv2 list, the total number of drugs prescribed, the number of administrations per day and the number of psychotropic and anticholinergic drugs. These criteria were compared between CMR and SPC group using linear and logistic regression models weighted on propensity scores. RESULTS: There were 137 patients included, 66 in the CMR group and 71 in the SPC group. The mean age was 87 years, the sex ratio was 0.65, the mean number of drugs prescribed was 9, the mean MMSE was 21 and at admission 242 POMs, and 363 PIMs were prescribed. Clinical medication review did not reduce the number of PIMs at discharge compared to SPC (beta = - 0.13 [- 0.84; 0.57], p = 0.71) nor did it reduce the number of drugs prescribed (p = 0.10), the number of psychotropic drugs (p = 0.17) or the anticholinergic load (p = 0.87). Clinical medication review resulted in more POMs being prescribed than in standard pharmaceutical care (beta = - 0.39 [- 0.72; - 0.06], p = 0.02). Cardiology POMs were more implemented in the medication review group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Clinical medication review did not reduce the number of PIMs but helped clinicians introduce underused drugs, especially cardiovascular drugs, which are known to be associated with morbidity and mortality risk reduction.

[Validation of a method for detecting hospitalizations for falls related to adverse drug reactions in geriatric departments]. / Validation d'une méthode de détection des hospitalisations pour chute liées à un effet indésirable médicamenteux en service de gériatrie aiguë.

Fall is one of the five main causes of drug-related hospital admissions (DRA) in France. A standardized chart review method, to identify DRA adapted to elderly patients, has recently been developed by Thevelin et al. Our first aim was to assess the reliability of this method for detecting DRA for falls in elderly subjects. Our second aim was to assess the feasibility of this method and to evaluate its reliability for assessing causality, the contribution of DRA to hospitalization, and the avoidability of DRAs in elderly patients hospitalized for a medication-related fall. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 16 patient cases admitted to the hospital for falls in May 2022, in the geriatric department of a French university hospital. Six healthcare professionals (pharmacists, pharmacologists, and geriatricians) assessed a method for detecting DRA individually and then in multidisciplinary pairs of raters. Inter-rater agreement (individually and in pairs) was assessed for DRA detection, causality, avoidability, and contribution of the DRA to hospitalization. A κ > 0,4 was considered a satisfactory threshold for agreement. The mean age was 86 years. When the assessment was done individually, detection of DRA-related hospitalizations (κ = 0,46; p < ,001), and DRA contribution to hospitalization (κ = 0,50; p < ,001) were moderately concordant. The causality assessment (κ = 0,09; p = 0,24) did not agree, and the avoidability assessment (κ = 0,63; p < ,001) agreed substantially. When the evaluation was done in pairs, detection of DRA-related hospitalizations (κ = 0,47; p < ,001) was moderately concordant between pairs. Avoidability assessment (κ = 0,79; p < ,001) concurred substantially. The assessment of causality (κ = 0,29; p = 0,01) and DRA contribution to hospitalization (κ = 0,38; p < .001) agreed fairly well. This study validated, individually and in pairs, the reliability of the method to identify DRA in the context of falls. This method will be of great use in research and epidemiological studies.

Cefepime use: A need for antimicrobial stewardship.

OBJECTIVES: Unlike other 3GCs, Cefepime is a cephalosporin that has, in animal model studies, shown a low risk of selecting resistant mutants. It also enables carbapenems to be saved in treatment of Pseudomonasaeruginosa and the CESP group (Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Serratia and Providencia, as well as the genus Klebsiellaaerogenes, Morganella and Hafnia), consequently producing cephalosporinase. We aimed to determine whether its prescription in a French teaching hospital met criteria for proper use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of proper cefepime use between March 1st, 2018 and February 28th, 2019, to assess indication, antimicrobial stewardship, dosing schedule, microbiological documentation, reevaluation, and treatment duration. Prescriptions were then compared to local guidelines established from international literature. RESULTS: Out of 142 cefepime prescriptions, 97.2% were prescribed as validated according to indication. The duration of the documented treatments matched the guidelines for 56.5% of patients, dosage was adapted to the indication for 77.4% and to kidney function for 97.2%. Bacteriological documentation was performed in all cases and an antibiogram was generated in 99.2% of cases. The treatment was reassessed between 48 and 72h and between the 7th and 10th day for 44.2% and 60.9% of the prescriptions respectively. The antimicrobial stewardship team managed half of the prescriptions. Only 13.4% of prescriptions met all criteria for proper use. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding a highly sizable majority of validated indications, a very small proportion of cefepime prescriptions met all the criteria for proper use. In the context of increased cefepime consumption, which is favored by its increased place in the latest recommendations published in 2019, proper use of cefepime prescriptions needs to be more effectively promoted.