Gaps in antidepressant prescribing in primary care in the United Kingdom.

An important determinant for achieving efficacy results in clinical practice comparable to those demonstrated in clinical trials is whether or not patients take their medication as prescribed. Recent studies have shown that 30-60% of patients do not take their medications as prescribed. Gaps between antidepressant prescriptions raise questions about the possibility of periods of nonadherence to medication in clinical practice. The purpose of conducting this study was to assess the likelihood of experiencing a gap of > 15 days between antidepressant prescriptions for patients with a depression-related diagnosis and to assess whether this likelihood varied across different antidepressants with tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Episodes of antidepressant treatment were constructed using the Doctors' Independent Network general practitioner medical records database. For all antidepressant agents considered, approximately 50% of patients had a gap between prescriptions and 15-25% of patients had a gap of > 15 days between prescriptions. A significant proportion of patients in a general practitioner setting in the UK have gaps recorded of > 15 days between antidepressant prescriptions. Gaps between prescriptions raise the question of whether patients may be at risk for clinical consequences associated with nonadherence to therapy, such as reduced effectiveness or treatment interruption symptomatology.

The cost of treatment dropout in depression. A cost-benefit analysis of fluoxetine vs. tricyclics.

In this study, we tried to estimate the economic potential benefit of the use of fluoxetine (PROZACR 20 mg, Lilly) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in depression of mild to moderate intensity. Fluoxetine has demonstrated, in controlled studies, significantly lower rates of side-effects and treatment dropout than TCAs while showing similar efficacy. Treatment dropout, especially at an early stage of the therapy, can have profound consequences, including excessive lengthening of the depressive episode, symptomatic relapse, increase of repeated days out of work, even suicides or suicide attempts. We estimated the expected cost of treatment dropout using a Delphi expert panel. We then computed the economic benefit of fluoxetine by combining the dropout cost and the differential rate of total treatment dropout between fluoxetine and TCAs, as found in clinical trials. We thus showed that a 8 week fluoxetine could be beneficial to society provided society values a year of human life above a threshold varying from French Francs 23.800 to FF8.600 (respectively, about US$4500 and 1600) depending on the type of depression. As these values are extremely low compared to those found in the literature, we concluded that an apparently costly innovation such as fluoxetine may induce short-term financial savings for society.