Brain Injury and Later-Life Cognitive Impairment and Neuropathology: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study.

BACKGROUND: Findings are inconsistent regarding the role of traumatic head injury in the subsequent development of neurologic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Examine the relationship between head injury and later cognitive impairment. METHODS: A sample of 3,123 Japanese-American men was assessed for history of head injury and evaluated for cognitive impairment using the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI). For a subsample of 676 respondents, neuropathologic results from those with and without head injury were compared. RESULTS: Although the crude model showed an association between history of head injury and later severe cognitive impairment, the relationship lost significance in the adjusted model (OR = 1.320, CI: 0.90-1.93), regardless of time between injury and impairment. Similar to cognitive impairment, hippocampal sclerosis was observed significantly more in the brains of respondents with a history of head injury in the crude model, but the relationship weakened in the adjusted model (OR = 1.462, CI: 0.68-3.12). After adjustment, decedents with a head injury demonstrated marginally higher brain weight (OR = 1.003, CI: 1.00-1.01). CONCLUSION: We did not find a relationship between head injury and subsequent cognitive decline in this cohort. The neuropathology results also displayed no strong association between history of head injury and specific brain lesions and characteristics. These results support other findings in prospective cohorts. However, they could be influenced by the demographic make-up of the sample (male Japanese-Americans) or by the observation that the majority reported only a single head injury.

The CAIDE Dementia Risk Score and the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study.

INTRODUCTION: The CAIDE (Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia) dementia risk score is based on demographic, genetic, and modifiable risk factors in midlife and has been shown to be predictive of later-life dementia. OBJECTIVE: To test the predictive capacity of the CAIDE dementia risk score among a cohort of Japanese-American men. METHODS: Midlife measures were obtained from a sample of 3,582 Japanese-American men in the Honolulu Heart Program (1965-1968, average age = 53.1 years). A follow-up exam in 1991 (average age = 77.8 years) assessed cognitive impairment using the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI). Severe cognitive impairment was defined as a CASI score <60. RESULTS: In this cohort, the CAIDE dementia risk score demonstrates significant association with later-life severe cognitive impairment (OR = 1.477, 95% CI: 1.39-1.58). However, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve c-statistics suggests poor predictive ability (c = 0.645, 95% CI: 0.62-0.67). Using a score cut-point of 10, the accuracy is acceptable (0.82), but the sensitivity is low (0.50). CONCLUSION: While the CAIDE dementia risk score at midlife is associated with later development of cognitive impairment in Japanese-American men, its predictive capacity in this population is weak.