Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 52(5): 448-52; discussion 452-3, 1994 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8169705

RESUMO

The purpose of this investigation was to compare two sedation techniques for use in outpatient third molar surgery. Forty ASA class I or II volunteers were randomly allocated to two groups. All subjects received supplemental oxygen via a nasal hood, sublimaze (.0007 mg/kg [corrected] intravenous bolus), and midazolam (.5 mg/min) titrated to effect. Using an incremental bolus technique, group A then received methohexital, while group B received propofol. Both groups maintained stable mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and end-tidal CO2 throughout the perioperative period. However, group A had a dramatic increase in heart rate (26.7% versus 13.9% for group B [P < .05]). Better postoperative psychomotor performance (P < .05) as measured by the Trieger Dot analysis was demonstrated by patients who received propofol. It was concluded that propofol is superior to methohexital for intravenous sedation.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Metoexital/farmacologia , Propofol/farmacologia , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Dióxido de Carbono/sangue , Humanos , Dente Serotino/cirurgia , Oxigênio/sangue , Desempenho Psicomotor/efeitos dos fármacos , Extração Dentária , Dente Impactado/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA