The effects of licogliflozin, a dual SGLT1/2 inhibitor, on body weight in obese patients with or without diabetes.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for a safer and more effective treatment for obesity. This study assessed the effects of licogliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 1/2, on body weight, metabolic parameters and incretin hormones in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. METHODS: Patients with obesity (BMI, 35-50 kg/m2 ) were enrolled into a 12-week study (N = 88; licogliflozin 150 mg q.d.). Patients with T2DM were enrolled into a second, two-part study, comprising a single-dose cross-over study (N = 12; 2.5 - 300 mg) and a 14-day dosing study (N = 30; 15 mg q.d). Primary endpoints included effects on body weight, effects on glucose, safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included urinary glucose excretion (UGE24 ) and pharmacokinetics, while exploratory endpoints assessed the effects on incretin hormones (total GLP-1, PYY3-36 , and GIP), insulin and glucagon. RESULTS: Treatment with licogliflozin 150 mg q.d. for 12 weeks in patients with obesity significantly reduced body weight by 5.7% vs placebo (P < 0.001) and improved metabolic parameters such as significantly reduced postprandial glucose excursion (21%; P < 0.001), reduced insulin levels (80%; P < 0.001) and increased glucagon (59%; P < 0.001). In patients with T2DM, a single dose of licogliflozin 300 mg in the morning prior to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remarkably reduced glucose excursion by 93% (P < 0.001; incremental AUC0-4h ) and suppressed insulin by 90% (P < 0.01; incremental AUC0-4h ). Treatment with licogliflozin 15 mg q.d. for 14 days reduced 24-hour average glucose levels by 26% (41 mg/dL; P < 0.001) and increased UGE24 to 100 g (P < 0.001) in patients with T2DM. In addition, this treatment regimen significantly increased total GLP-1 by 54% (P < 0.001) and PYY3-36 by 67% (P < 0.05) post OGTT vs placebo, while significantly reducing GIP levels by 53% (P < 0.001). Treatment with licogliflozin was generally safe and well tolerated. Diarrhea (increased numbers of loose stool) was the most common adverse event in all studies (90% with licogliflozin vs 25% with placebo in the 12-week study), while a lower incidence of flatulence, abdominal pain and abdominal distension (25%-43% with licogliflozin vs 9%-11% with placebo in the 12-week study) were among the other gastrointestinal events reported. CONCLUSION: Licogliflozin treatment (1-84 days) leads to significant weight loss and favourable changes in a variety of metabolic parameters and incretin hormones. Dual inhibition of SGLT1/2 with licogliflozin in the gut and kidneys is an attractive strategy for treating obesity and diabetes.

Bimagrumab improves body composition and insulin sensitivity in insulin-resistant individuals.

AIM: To test the hypothesis that an improving body composition in insulin-resistant individuals could enhance insulin sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 16 people with a mean body mass index of 29.3 kg/m2 and insulin resistance, received a single dose of bimagrumab or placebo and were assessed at week 10 for insulin sensitivity, using a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp and an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), and for body composition using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and positron-emission tomography. RESULTS: Bimagrumab increased lean mass by 2.7% (P < .05) and reduced fat mass by 7.9% (P = .011) at week 10 compared with placebo, and had a neutral effect on body weight. Bimagrumab reduced glycated haemoglobin by 0.21% at week 18 (P < .001) and improved insulin sensitivity by ~20% (according to the clamp) to ~40% (according to the IVGTT). CONCLUSION: Taking the observed changes together, and given that these occurred without accompanying dietary intervention and without any prescribed regular physical exercise, bimagrumab may offer a novel approach for the treatment of the metabolic complications of obesity.

Discovery of an Orally Bioavailable Benzimidazole Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) Inhibitor That Suppresses Body Weight Gain in Diet-Induced Obese Dogs and Postprandial Triglycerides in Humans.

Modification of a gut restricted class of benzimidazole DGAT1 inhibitor 1 led to 9 with good oral bioavailability. The key structural changes to 1 include bioisosteric replacement of the amide with oxadiazole and α,α-dimethylation of the carboxylic acid, improving DGAT1 potency and gut permeability. Since DGAT1 is expressed in the small intestine, both 1 and 9 can suppress postprandial triglycerides during acute oral lipid challenges in rats and dogs. Interestingly, only 9 was found to be effective in suppressing body weight gain relative to control in a diet-induced obese dog model, suggesting the importance of systemic inhibition of DGAT1 for body weight control. 9 has advanced to clinical investigation and successfully suppressed postprandial triglycerides during an acute meal challenge in humans.

Pradigastat disposition in humans: in vivo and in vitro investigations.

1. Pradigastat is a potent and specific diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1 (DGAT1) inhibitor effective in lowering postprandial triglycerides (TG) in healthy human subjects and fasting TG in familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) patients. 2. Here we present the results of human oral absorption, metabolism and excretion (AME), intravenous pharmacokinetic (PK), and in vitro studies which together provide an overall understanding of the disposition of pradigastat in humans. 3. In human in vitro systems, pradigastat is metabolized slowly to a stable acyl glucuronide (M18.4), catalyzed mainly by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) 1A1, UGT1A3 and UGT2B7. M18.4 was observed at very low levels in human plasma. 4. In the human AME study, pradigastat was recovered in the feces as parent drug, confounding the assessment of pradigastat absorption and the important routes of elimination. However, considering pradigastat exposure after oral and intravenous dosing, this data suggests that pradigastat was completely bioavailable in the radiolabeled AME study and therefore completely absorbed. 5. Pradigastat is eliminated very slowly into the feces, presumably via the bile. Renal excretion is negligible. Oxidative metabolism is minimal. The extent to which pradigastat is eliminated via metabolism to M18.4 could not be established from these studies due to the inherent instability of glucuronides in the gastrointestinal tract.

A Diacylglycerol Transferase 1 Inhibitor Is a Potent Hepatitis C Antiviral in Vitro but Not in Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant cause of liver disease affecting 80-150 million people globally. Diacylglycerol transferase 1 (DGAT-1), a triglyceride synthesis enzyme, is important for the HCV life cycle in vitro. Pradigastat, a potent DGAT-1 inhibitor found to lower triglycerides and HgbA1c in patients, was investigated for safety and efficacy in patients with HCV. This was a two-part study. In the in vitro study, the effect of pradigastat on virus production was evaluated in infected cells in culture. In the clinical study ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01387958 ), 32 patients with HCV infection were randomized to receive pradigastat or placebo (26:6) once daily for 14 days. Primary efficacy outcomes were serum viral RNA and alanine aminotransferase levels. In vitro, pradigastat significantly reduced virus production, consistent with inhibition of viral assembly and release. However, the clinical study was prematurely terminated for lack of efficacy. There was no significant change in serum viral RNA levels after dosing with pradigastat or placebo for 14 days. Pradigastat was safe and well-tolerated in this population. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal; there were no hepatic adverse events. Although pradigastat had a potent antiviral effect in vitro, no significant antiviral effect was observed in patients at predicted efficacious exposures.

Effect of Pradigastat, a Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 1 Inhibitor, on the QTcF Interval in Humans.

Pradigastat, a novel diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor, has been studied in familial chylomicronemia syndrome. To evaluate the effects of supratherapeutic concentrations of pradigastat on the QTc interval, 2 studies were conducted. The first study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single escalating intravenous doses of pradigastat (10, 30, 100, and 115 mg over 60 minutes) in healthy adults. Single intravenous doses were safe, well tolerated, and at the higher doses resulted in supratherapeutic pradigastat exposure. The second was a parallel, 3-arm thorough QTc study in which healthy male subjects were randomized to pradigastat (115 mg intravenously), moxifloxacin (400 mg oral, positive control), or placebo. Following intravenous administration, pradigastat exposure peaked at 4 times the therapeutic concentration and did not prolong the baseline-adjusted and placebo-corrected QTc intervals. During the 60-minute pradigastat infusion, a number of infusion reactions and a small mean decrease in QTc were observed. Both effects disappeared when the infusion was stopped, suggesting that an infusate excipient may have been responsible. As expected, moxifloxacin significantly increased the QTc interval at multiple points, confirming the study's sensitivity to detect a true positive effect. Pradigastat is therefore unlikely to increase the risk of dysrhythmias associated with QTc prolongation in humans.

Evaluation of food effect on the oral bioavailability of pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor.

Pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor, is being developed for the treatment of familial chylomicronemia syndrome. The results of two studies that evaluated the effect of food on the oral bioavailability of pradigastat using randomized, open-label, parallel group designs in healthy subjects (n=24/treatment/study) are presented. In study 1, a single dose of 20 mg pradigastat was administered under the fasted condition or with a high-fat meal. In study 2, a single dose of 40 mg pradigastat was administered under the fasted condition or with a low- or high-fat meal. At the 20 mg dose, the pradigastat Cmax and AUClast increased by 38% and 41%, respectively, with a high-fat meal. When 40 mg pradigastat was administered with a low-fat meal, the Cmax and AUClast increased by 8% and 18%, respectively, whereas with a high-fat meal the increase was 20% and 18%, respectively. The population pharmacokinetic analysis with the pooled data from 13 studies indicated that administration of pradigastat with a meal resulted in an increase of 30% in both the Cmax and AUC parameters. Based on these results, food overall increased pradigastat exposure in the range of less than 40%, which is not considered clinically significant. Both 20 and 40 mg doses of pradigastat were well tolerated under fasted or fed conditions.

Effect of the DGAT1 inhibitor pradigastat on triglyceride and apoB48 levels in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare lipid disease caused by complete lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency resulting in fasting chylomicronemia and severe hypertriglyceridemia. Inhibition of diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1), which mediates chylomicron triglyceride (TG) synthesis, is an attractive strategy to reduce TG levels in FCS. In this study we assessed the safety, tolerability and TG-lowering efficacy of the DGAT1 inhibitor pradigastat in patients with FCS. METHODS: Six FCS patients were enrolled in an open-label clinical study. Following a 1-week very low fat diet run-in period patients underwent baseline lipid assessments, including a low fat meal tolerance test. Patients then underwent three consecutive 21 day treatment periods (pradigastat at 20, 40 & 10 mg, respectively). Treatment periods were separated by washout periods of ≥4 weeks. Fasting TG levels were assessed weekly through the treatment periods. Postprandial TGs, ApoB48 and lipoprotein lipid content were also monitored. RESULTS: Following once daily oral dosing, steady-state exposure was reached by Day 14. There was an approximately dose proportional increase in pradigastat exposure at studied doses. Pradigastat was associated with a 41% (20 mg) and 70% (40 mg) reduction in fasting triglyceride over 21 days of treatment. The reduction in fasting TG was almost entirely accounted for by a reduction in chylomicron TG. Pradigastat treatment also led to substantial reductions in postprandial TG as well as apo48 (both fasting and postprandial). Pradigastat was safe and well tolerated, with only mild, transient gastrointestinal adverse events. CONCLUSION: The novel DGAT1 inhibitor pradigastat substantially reduces plasma TG levels in FCS patients, and may be a promising new treatment for this orphan disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01146522 .

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of pradigastat, a novel diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor in overweight or obese, but otherwise healthy human subjects.

Pradigastat is a potent and selective inhibitor of diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1, an enzyme highly expressed in the small intestine that plays a key role in postprandial triglyceride synthesis. This first-in-human study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of pradigastat administered at single and multiple doses in overweight or obese healthy subjects. In single-dose cohorts (n = 72), subjects were randomized sequentially to receive single doses of pradigastat (1, 3, 10, 30, 100, or 300 mg) or placebo under fasted condition and prior to breakfast. In multiple-dose cohorts (n = 106), subjects were randomized to receive pradigastat (1, 5, 10, or 25 mg) or placebo prior to breakfast for 14 days. Following a single oral dosing, pradigastat was absorbed slowly, with a median tmax of ∼10 hours and eliminated slowly with a long half-life. With multiple oral doses, a 10- to 17-fold higher systemic exposure was observed. Pradigastat treatment (single and multiple doses) led to dose-dependent suppression of postprandial triglyceride excursions over 9 hours following a high-fat meal test. In addition, pradigastat suppressed postprandial glucose and insulin and increased plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 levels. Overall, pradigastat was safe and tolerated at single and multiple doses in healthy subjects.

Effect of pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy female subjects.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between pradigastat, a potent and selective diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor, and Levora-28®, a combination oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 µg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 µg levonorgestrel (LVG). METHODS: An open-label, single-sequence three-period (period 1, single dose of COC; period 2, pradigastat 100 mg x 3 days followed by 40 mg x 7 days; and period 3, both pradigastat 40 mg and a single dose of COC) study involving 24 healthy female subjects of childbearing potential was conducted. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of EE were similar when administered alone or in combination with pradigastat, as the 90% confidence interval (CI) of geometric mean ratios for EE exposure (AUC and C(max)) were all within the range of 0.80 - 1.25. The AUC(∞), AUC(last), and C(max) of LVG were slightly increased in the presence of pradigastat, the geometric mean ratios (90% CI) were 1.25 (1.16, 1.35), 1.24 (1.15, 1.34), and 1.16 (1.06, 1.27), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pradigastat did not elicit clinically relevant changes in the magnitude of Levora-28® exposure. Therefore, dose adjustment is not required for Levora-28® when co-administered with pradigastat.

Medical resource use and costs associated with chylomicronemia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG > 1000 mg/dl) is estimated at 150-400 per 100,000 individuals in North America. Severe hypertriglyceridemia in the fasting state is associated with increased acute pancreatitis risk and is a sign of chylomicronemia which reflects the accumulation in the bloodstream of chylomicrons, the large lipoprotein particles produced in the gut after a meal. OBJECTIVE: To assess medical resource use and costs associated with chylomicronemia. METHODS: Patients with chylomicronemia of different causes (≥2 diagnoses with ICD-9 code 272.3) were identified from a large US claims database (years 2000 to 2009) and matched 1:1 to controls free of chylomicronemia based on age, gender, demographics, comorbidities, and use of lipid lowering drugs. During a 1-year study period, medical resource use and costs associated with chylomicronemia or acute pancreatitis were compared between matched cases and controls. RESULTS: Among 6472 matched pairs, annual per-patient medical costs, calculated independently of the occurrence of acute pancreatitis, were significantly greater by $808 for chylomicronemia cases vs controls ($8029 vs $7220, p < 0.01), half of which was attributable to chylomicronemia-related services (p < 0.01). Chylomicronemia cases with a history of acute pancreatitis (n = 46) had greater rates of inpatient visits (p < 0.05) and greater average costs for subsequent acute pancreatitis or abdominal pain (p < 0.01) as well as greater total medical costs ($33,587 vs $4402, p < 0.01) vs matched controls. The average episode of acute pancreatitis (n = 104 episodes) generated medical costs of $31,820, almost entirely due to inpatient stays. LIMITATIONS: Triglyceride levels were not available to characterize disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chylomicronemia, and especially those with a history of acute pancreatitis, incurred significantly greater total medical costs compared with individuals without chylomicronemia but with an otherwise comparable health profile.

Baseline achievement of lipid goals and usage of lipid medications in patients with diabetes mellitus (from the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial).

The American Diabetes Association has established lipid goals for patients with diabetes. Although diabetic populations historically have poor low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goal adherence, little is known about adherence to triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol goals. To determine the degree of lipid goal attainment among patients with diabetes, and to characterize the patterns of lipid medication use, we evaluated the baseline data from 1,742 enrollees of the national Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial. Using current American Diabetes Association lipid guidelines, we calculated the proportion of participants achieving a LDL cholesterol level <100 mg/dl, triglyceride level <150 mg/dl, and HDL cholesterol level >40 mg/dl in men (>50 mg/dl in women). We also performed a descriptive analysis of the use of lipid medications in this population. The baseline LDL cholesterol level was 111 +/- 63 mg/dl, triglyceride level was 213 +/- 277 mg/dl, and HDL cholesterol was 36 +/- 10 mg/dl. At enrollment, 44% of veterans met the LDL cholesterol goal, 58% met the triglyceride goal, and 16% met the HDL cholesterol goal, but only 6% met all 3 goals. Of the 1,742 enrollees, 2/3 were receiving lipid therapy, with statins (58%) the most commonly used drug. Combination lipid therapy was used by 11% of enrollees. Although the enrollees of the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial demonstrated better adherence to the American Diabetes Association's LDL cholesterol goal than other diabetic populations recently studied, more aggressive and directed lipid medication use is needed to treat the overall lipid profile better.

Type of preexisting lipid therapy predicts LDL-C response to ezetimibe.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe as monotherapy or in combination with statins effectively lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, there are few reports of ezetimibe's effect when added to ongoing non-statin lipid-lowering drugs or combination lipid-lowering therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preexisting lipid therapy on LDL-C response to ezetimibe. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients started on ezetimibe therapy at the Veterans Affairs Long Beach Healthcare System between March 1, 2003, and March 1, 2005. We calculated the ezetimibe-induced percent change in LDL-C in patients without concomitant changes in other lipid-lowering medications. We then stratified the population according to the type and number of preexisting lipid therapies and compared the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe among these groups. RESULTS: Overall, ezetimibe was associated with a 23.0% reduction in LDL-C. Patients with preexisting statin monotherapy had significantly greater LDL-C reduction with ezetimibe than did those with preexisting non-statin drugs (-26.1% vs -9.3%; p = 0.0138). In patients with no preexisting lipid therapy (n = 58), monotherapy (n = 115), double therapy (n = 36), or triple therapy (n = 9), ezetimibe decreased LDL-C by 17.3%, 21.4%, 33.5%, and 38.1%, respectively. This stepwise trend in increased ezetimibe efficacy was statistically significant, even with adjustments for baseline LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe's LDL-C-lowering effects are most pronounced when added to preexisting combination lipid therapy. It appears to be more effective when added to statin therapy compared with other lipid-lowering therapies.

Anticipating the evolution of clinical cholesterol guidelines: implications of recent statin intervention trials.

Over the past two decades, statin-based intervention trials have conclusively shown that lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) prevents cardiovascular disease and death. In response to these trials, the National Cholesterol Education Program has established and refined LDL-C goals in its Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) guidelines. In response to five new statin trials, the 2004 update to ATP III called for more aggressive lowering of LDL-C. Subsequent to the ATP III update, three large-scale statin trials have been published with implications for the management of cholesterol. Review of these recent trials indicates that improved methods of risk stratification and intensification of LDL-C goals are trends which are likely to continue into the future.