Treatment with immunosuppressants did not increase the risk of COVID-19 in pemphigus patients: A single-center survey-based study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and outcomes of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) among patients using glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants remain controversial. AIM: The study aims to investigate the impact of immunosuppressants especially glucocorticoids on patients in the Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Cohort of West China Hospital (AIBDWCH) during COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 7, 2022, to February 8, 2023, using questionnaires administered either face-to-face or by phone. COVID-19 cases were classified as confirmed, probable, or suspected according to World Health Organization criteria. Patients were divided into Group A (confirmed and probable cases) and Group B (suspected and other cases). The impact of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents on COVID-19 disease and progression was evaluated with logistic regression models. RESULTS: This study included 111 patients with pemphigus. Overweight patients had a reduced risk of confirmed COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] 0.35 [95 % CI 0.13-0.97], p = 0.045). Patients treated with a medium dose of prednisone during the pandemic had a lower incidence of COVID-19 compared to those on low doses, though the difference was not statistically significant. No independent effects of age, sex, comorbidities, and therapies were observed. No significant differences were found in COVID-19 symptoms among different therapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with immunosuppressants, particularly glucocorticoids at low-to-medium doses, did not elevate COVID-19 risk in pemphigus patients. Consistent outcomes across treatments confirm the safety of these therapies during the pandemic.

Palmoplantar pustulosis with psoriatic arthritis ineffective to interleukin-17 inhibitors: two patients successfully treated with upadacitinib.

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a rare chronic pustular disease. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is one of the common manifestations of arthritis in PPP associated with a high burden of disease. The treatment of PPP is difficult and still in the exploratory stage. Only a few cases show that PPP complicated with arthritis have been successfully treated with janus kinase inhibition, interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors, IL-12/23 inhibitors and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Here we reported that two patients were diagnosed as PPP with PsA and initially treated with IL-17 inhibitors. One case was only partially relieved, and the other case had severe paradoxical reaction in the trunk. The joint and skin condition of two patients had been significantly improved without reported adverse reactions after 18 weeks treatment with upadacitinib, which support upadacitinib may be a potential option for patients with PPP combined PsA.

A Propensity Score-Matched Study on the Changes of TB Status and TB-IGRA Values in Patients with Psoriasis with Latent TB Receiving Secukinumab.

INTRODUCTION: The utilization of biologics in patients with psoriasis with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) has garnered significant attention. Although the tuberculosis (TB) safety profile of second-generation biologics, including secukinumab, has been partially confirmed in both clinical trials and real-world studies, the necessity for prophylactic therapy in patients with LTBI prior to administering this class of biologics remains a topic of controversy. METHODS: This study enrolled 62 patients with psoriasis with LTBI who underwent secukinumab with routine TB reexamination. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received antituberculosis therapy (ATB; n = 48) or not (NTB; n = 16). We performed a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis between ATB and NTB subgroups and retrospectively reviewed their interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) and radiographic results. RESULTS: No active TB case was reported on the basis of medical records and chest radiographs in either two group. Before PSM, the mean reexamining IGRA value was significantly elevated in patients who received prophylactic therapy (P = 0.00), but no significant increase was observed in patients who were not. After PSM, there was no significant IGRA value enhancement whether or not patients received prophylactic treatment. CONCLUSION: Our data provide additional information on the safety profile of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis with LTBI. Furthermore, our presentation of the reexamined IGRA results revealed no significant elevation in the ATB or NTB group. As such, we believe further exploration is necessary to determine whether anti-TB medication is required prior to administering secukinumab.

In the past decade, biologics have revolutionized psoriasis treatment. Among patients receiving biologics, tuberculosis infection is a big concern. Secukinumab, an interleukin-17 inhibitor, belongs to the second-generation biologics. Clinical trials and real-life experience have partially reported its tuberculosis safety. In 2020, a systematic review of randomized clinical trials of secukinumab found no reactivate tuberculosis case. However, when participants tested positive for latent tuberculosis infection at screening in the clinical trials, they received antituberculosis treatment. Should patients with latent tuberculosis infection receive antituberculosis medication before receiving secukinumab? The answer is controversial and lacks evidence. This study enrolled patients with psoriasis with latent tuberculosis infection who underwent secukinumab with routine tuberculosis reexamination. Then, the patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received antituberculosis therapy and not. We observed that neither of these two groups presented tuberculosis activation cases. We also matched patients who received antituberculosis therapy and those who did not. The interferon-gamma release assay showed no significant increase after balancing the baseline. Our data indicated that secukinumab is safe among patients with latent tuberculosis infection even when they did not receive antituberculosis treatment.

Correlation of catecholamine content and clinical influencing factors in depression among psoriasis patients: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Our study sought to investigate the clinical influencing factors of psoriasis patients with depression, and analyze whether the content of monoamine neurotransmitters in plasma was correlated with depression incidence among psoriasis patients. METHODS: Ninety patients with psoriasis and 40 healthy volunteers (aged from18 to 60) were recruited and interviewed with a piloted questionnaire in both groups to obtain relevant information. The catecholamine in plasma from the two groups was analyzed by radioimmunoassay. The data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: The mean Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and mean Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) scores of the psoriasis patients were higher than the control group. Dopamine content in the plasma was lower (comparing psoriasis patients without depression and the control group, and was negatively correlated with HAMD, AIS, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores in the psoriasis patients with depression. There was no significant difference in the epinephrine and norepinephrine contents in all groups. PASI scores were positively correlated with HAMD scores in psoriasis patients. The low dopamine content, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and high PASI scores were the risk factors for depression among the psoriasis patients. CONCLUSION: Psoriasis patients have a significantly higher risk of depression than healthy people, and higher PASI scores were linked to a higher incidence of depression. The dopamine levels of patients were influenced by both psoriasis and depression. The risk factors for depression in psoriasis patients are low dopamine levels in the plasma, severe skin lesions, and lower quality of life.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (C-PHQ-9) in patients with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (C-PHQ-9) in patients with psoriasis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with psoriasis who have not been diagnosed with depression (n=148; mean age 43.37±17.46 years; 31.19% female). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures considered in this study were the C-PHQ-9 and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD). The American Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-V) was used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of depression. Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability after 1 week were evaluated using reliability analysis, and criterion and structural validity were assessed using validity analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the best demarcation score and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Compared with DSM-V (27.27%), both C-PHQ-9 (39.19%) and HAMD (31.01%) had higher rates for detecting depression. The mean completion time for C-PHQ-9 evaluation (2.02±0.84 min) was significantly less than that for HAMD (23.37±3.21 min, p<0.001). The Cronbach's α coefficient for the C-PHQ-9 was 0.938. The correlation coefficients of the nine items with the total scale ranged from 0.540 to 0.854, and the mean inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.376 to 0.933. After a week, the retest coefficient was 0.955 (p<0.01). Principal component factor analysis showed that C-PHQ-9 identified a unifactorial structure. The best cut-off point was 9 points, with a sensitivity of 98.00% and a specificity of 90.80%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.979 (95% CI 0.968 to 0.991). CONCLUSION: C-PHQ-9 has good reliability and validity in patients with psoriasis and can be used for primary screening of patients with psoriasis and depression. This scale has obvious time and labour advantages over the HAMD and should be considered for use in clinical practice.