Technical Note: Effects of rotating gantry on magnetic field and eddy currents in 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy (MR-IGRT) system.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the cause of severe image artifacts that occurred during gantry rotation in a 0.35 T MRI-Linac by comparing measurements of eddy currents, center frequency, and field inhomogeneities made with the gantry in motion and stationary. METHODS: Gradient and B0 eddy currents were calculated from the free induction decays (FIDs) resulting from selective excitation at a temporal resolution of 200 ms/measurement. B0 eddy currents were also calculated from FIDs acquired with nonselective excitation at a temporal resolution of 100 ms/measurement. Center frequencies and B0 inhomogeneities were measured by acquiring FIDs with a repetition time (TR) of 290 ms. Cartesian and radial 2D true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP) pulse sequences used in real-time MRI-guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) were acquired. To assess artifact severity, the normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) was calculated between a reference MRI (static gantry) and MRIs acquired during gantry rotation for each serial acquisition. Image artifacts were qualitatively graded as nominal, minor, or severe. Measurements were conducted while the gantry was rotated through its entire range for both clockwise and counterclockwise. Measurements during gantry rotation were compared to measurements with a stationary gantry (every 30°). RESULTS: Severe image artifacts were observed 22-35% of the time while the gantry was rotating. Short time constant eddy currents were not affected by gantry rotation. The peak to peak center frequency and FWHM rose by factors of 13.2-14.5 and 1.1-1.6, respectively, for the rotating versus stationary gantry. The magnitude of the center frequency offset and field inhomogeneities depended on the direction of the gantry rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Image artifacts during gantry rotation were primarily caused by center frequency variations and field inhomogeneities. Therefore, dynamic B0 compensation techniques should be able to reduce artifacts during gantry rotation.

Effects of B0 eddy currents on imaging isocenter shifts in 0.35-T MRI-guided radiotherapy (MR-IGRT) system.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure gantry angle-related eddy currents in a 0.35-T MRI-Linac and determine if B0 (zeroth order) eddy currents are the primary cause of gantry angle-dependent imaging isocenter shifts vs other potential causes like B0 inhomogeneities and gradient (first order) eddy currents. For conventional Cartesian acquisitions, B0 eddy currents can cause imaging isocenter shifts along both phase encode and readout directions. Gradient eddy currents can cause spatial distortion along both the phase encode and readout directions. Center frequency offsets can cause imaging isocenter shifts along the readout direction that vary with readout gradient polarity. METHODS: MRI-related eddy currents and imaging isocenter shifts were measured on a 0.35-T MRI-Linac at gantry angles from 0° to 330° in increments of 30° . All measurements were made after gradient shimming and center frequency tuning at each planned gantry angle. Eddy current and field homogeneity measurements were conducted using a 24-cm diameter spherical phantom. Gradient and B0 eddy currents were calculated from the free induction decays (FIDs) resulting from selective excitation of slices located ±5 cm from isocenter. B0 eddy currents were also calculated from FIDs acquired with nonselective excitation and compared with B0 eddy current values derived using selective excitation. B0 inhomogeneities and center frequency offsets were measured by acquiring FIDs with nonselective excitation. Imaging isocenter shifts were measured using a 33x33x10.5 cm3 uniformity linearity (grid) phantom and a 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP) sequence used in MRI-guided radiation therapy. Eddy currents were compared to vendor specifications and correlated with the imaging isocenter shifts. Measurements were conducted before and after the MRI-Linac's waveguide was replaced with an updated design to reduce eddy currents. RESULTS: B0 eddy currents were highly correlated (r = 0.986, P << 0.001) for measurements made with vs without selective excitation. Transverse (X and Y) axis B0 eddy currents before and after the waveguide upgrade were out of specification (specification: ≤0.1 µT m/mT for delays < 10 ms) for most of the measured gantry angles. Gradient eddy currents before and after the upgrade were within specifications for the measured gantry angles (≤0.1% for delays < 10 ms). B0 eddy currents and imaging isocenter shifts were highly correlated (r = 0.965, P << 0.001). After the Linac waveguide upgrade, root mean square (RMS) peak B0 and gradient eddy currents dropped 45% and 11%, respectively, for delays <10 ms, while imaging isocenter shifts dropped 53%. Isocenter shifts were observed in both phase encode and readout directions. Center frequency offsets were <26 Hz while B0 inhomogeneities were <33 Hz full width at half maximum (FWHM). CONCLUSIONS: Imaging isocenter shifts measured in a 0.35-T MRI-Linac were highly correlated with B0 eddy currents. The eddy currents and imaging isocenter shifts decreased after the MRI-Linac's waveguide was replaced.

Feasibility and safety of focused ultrasound-enabled liquid biopsy in the brain of a porcine model.

Although blood-based liquid biopsy is a promising noninvasive technique to acquire a comprehensive molecular tumor profile by detecting cancer-specific biomarkers (e.g. DNA, RNA, and proteins), there has been limited progress for brain tumor application partially because the low permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) hinders the release of tumor biomarkers. We previously demonstrated focused ultrasound-enabled liquid biopsy (FUS-LBx) that uses FUS to increase BBB permeability in murine glioblastoma models and thus enhance the release of tumor-specific biomarkers into the bloodstream. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of FUS-LBx in the normal brain tissue of a porcine model. Increased BBB permeability was confirmed by the significant increase (p = 0.0053) in Ktrans (the transfer coefficient from blood to brain extravascular extracellular space) when comparing the FUS-sonicated brain area with the contralateral non-sonicated area. Meanwhile, there was a significant increase in the blood concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, p = 0.0074) and myelin basic protein (MBP, p = 0.0039) after FUS sonication as compared with before FUS. There was no detectable tissue damage by T2*-weighted MRI and histological analysis. Findings from this study suggest that FUS-LBx is a promising technique for noninvasive and localized diagnosis of the molecular profiles of brain diseases with the potential to translate to the clinic.

MRI quality control for low-field MR-IGRT systems: Lessons learned.

PURPOSE: To present lessons learned from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality control (QC) tests for low-field MRI-guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) systems. METHODS: MRI QC programs were established for low-field MRI-60 Co and MRI-Linac systems. A retrospective analysis of MRI subsystem performance covered system commissioning, operations, maintenance, and quality control. Performance issues were classified into three groups: (a) Image noise and artifact; (b) Magnetic field homogeneity and linearity; and (c) System reliability and stability. RESULTS: Image noise and artifacts were attributed to room noise sources, unsatisfactory system cabling, and broken RF receiver coils. Gantry angle-dependent magnetic field inhomogeneities were more prominent on the MRI-Linac due to the high volume of steel shielding in the gantry. B0 inhomogeneities measured in a 24-cm spherical phantom were <5 ppm for both MR-IGRT systems after using MRI gradient offset (MRI-GO) compensation on the MRI-Linac. However, significant signal dephasing occurred on the MRI-Linac while the gantry was rotating. Spatial integrity measurements were sensitive to gradient calibration and vulnerable to shimming. The most common causes of MR-IGRT system interruptions were software disconnects between the MRI and radiation therapy delivery subsystems caused by patient table, gantry, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) faults. The standard deviation (SD) of the receiver coil signal-to-noise ratio was 1.83 for the MRI-60 Co and 1.53 for the MRI-Linac. The SD of the deviation from the mean for the Larmor frequency was 1.41 ppm for the MRI-60 Co and 1.54 ppm for the MRI-Linac. The SD of the deviation from the mean for the transmitter reference amplitude was 0.90% for the MRI-60 Co and 1.68% for the MRI-Linac. High SDs in image stability data corresponded to reports of spike noise. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant technological challenges associated with implementing and maintaining MR-IGRT systems. Most of the performance issues were identified and resolved during commissioning.