Outcome from injury: general health, work status, and satisfaction 12 months after trauma.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated outcomes 12 months after trauma in terms of general health, satisfaction, and work status. METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven patients without severe neurotrauma were evaluated by interview during admission and by mailed self-report 6 and 12 months after trauma. Data were obtained from the Trauma Registry, interviews, and survey instruments. Baseline assessment was obtained with the Short Form 36 (SF36) and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) work scale. Outcome measures were the SF36, SIP work scale, Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) depression scale, the Civilian Mississippi Scale for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and a satisfaction questionnaire. Three regressions were determined for outcome. The dependent variables were general health and work status (linear) and satisfaction (logistic). Each regression controlled for baseline status and mental health, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and 12-month SF36 physical function before evaluating the effect of outcome mental health. RESULTS: Follow-up data were available for 75% of the patients at 6 months and 51% at 12 months. The mean age of patients was 37.2 +/- 0.9 years (+/-SEM), and 73% were male. Their average ISS was 13.9 +/- 0.6. Seventy percent of injuries were blunt force, 13.5 % were penetrating, and 16.5 % were burn injuries (mean total body surface area, 13.3 +/- 1.5%). Sixty-four percent of the patients had returned to work at 12 months. Follow-up SF36 mental health was associated with the dependent outcome in each regression. After controlling for baseline status and mental health, ISS, and outcome SF36 physical function, outcome mental health was associated with outcome SF36 general health (p < 0.001), SIP work status (p = 0.017), and satisfaction with recovery (p = 0.005). Outcome SF36 mental health was related to baseline mental health, 12-month PTSD and BSI depression scores, and increased drug and alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months after trauma, patients' work status, general health, and overall satisfaction with recovery are dependent on outcome mental health. This dependency persists despite measured baseline status, ISS, or physical recovery. The mental disease after trauma is attributable to poor mental health, the development of symptoms of PTSD and depression, and increased substance abuse. Trauma centers that fail to recognize, assess, and treat these injury-related mental health outcomes are not fully assisting their patients to return to optimal function.

Posttraumatic stress disorder in injured adults: etiology by path analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) impairs outcome from injury. We present a path analysis of factors related to the development of PTSD in injured adults. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 250 patients without severe neurotrauma was evaluated by interview during admission and by mailed self-report 6 months later. Data were gathered from the trauma registry (age, injury mechanism, and Injury Severity Score), social history (gender, income, education, and social support), and survey instruments. Baseline assessment used the Michigan Critical Events Perception Scale (peritraumatic dissociation and subjective threat to life), the Life Experience Survey (stressful exposure history), and the SF36 (general and mental health). PTSD at 6 months was identified with the civilian Mississippi Scale for PTSD. Data are listed as mean +/- SEM or percent (%). Path analysis was conducted by linear regression and significant (p<0.05) variables are shown. Factors are listed with the standardized beta. A negative beta suggests a protective effect. RESULTS: The 176 patients (72%) who completed the 6-month follow-up were 37.7+/-0.88 years old; 75% were men; and blunt (70%), penetrating (13.5%), and burn (16.4%) mechanisms caused the injuries. Assault was involved in 14.5% of the cases. Average income was $44,300+/-2,700/yr, education was 13.0+/-0.15 years, and Injury Severity Score was 13.9+/-0.50. A total of 42.3% of the patients developed PTSD. The 39.7% of the variance in PTSD explained by the model was due to intentional injury (beta = 0.27), male gender (beta = -0.21), age (beta = -0.20), peritraumatic dissociation (beta = 0.174), baseline mental health (beta = -0.21), and prior life-threatening illness (beta = -0.29). Peritraumatic dissociation was due to the patient's sense of threat to life (beta = -0.47), and threat was related to Injury Severity Score (beta = 0.2), assault(beta = 0.14), education (beta = -0.15), and age (beta = -0.19). Baseline SF36 mental health was related to social support (beta = 0.27) and income (beta = 0.21). Income was contingent on education (beta = 0.21). CONCLUSION: PTSD occurred in 42.3% of injured adults 6 months after trauma and was related to assault, dissociation, female gender, youth, poor mental health, and prior illness. By modeling PTSD, we may learn more of the etiology, risk stratification, and potentials for the treatment of this common and important morbidity of injury.

Posttraumatic stress disorder after injury: impact on general health outcome and early risk assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively components of general health outcome after trauma and to report on the further validation of the Michigan Critical Events Perception Scale (MCEPS), an instrument that predicts increased risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: Adults without neurologic injury admitted to a Level I trauma center in 1997 were interviewed during hospitalization. Baseline data included demographics, injury mechanism, Injury Severity Score, the Short Form 36 (SF36), and the MCEPS, which measures peri-traumatic dissociation (the sense of depersonalization or derealization during an injury event). Surveys sent by mail and completed 6 months later included the SF36 and civilian Mississippi Scale for PTSD. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were interviewed; the 70% (n = 100 patients) who completed the 6-month assessment form the study group. Injuries were categorized as 71% blunt, 13% penetrating, and 16% burn. Mean Injury Severity Score was 13.7+/-0.52. PTSD at 6 months occurred in 42% of the patients and was directly related to MCEPS dissociation (p = 0.001; odds ratio = 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.6, 5.9). A stepwise linear regression explains 40% of the variance in 6-month SF36 general health outcome (adjusted R2 = 0.402). The model controls for individual factors related to dissociation, PTSD, and general health outcome. Development of PTSD was independently and inversely related to general health outcome as measured by the SF36 at 6 months (p < 0.001, beta = -0.404). The R2 change of 0.132 for PTSD (vs. 0.082 for 6-month physical function) illustrates that PTSD contributes more to the patient's perceived general health at 6 months than the degree of physical function or injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: Within hours of injury, the MCEPS identifies patients who are three times more likely to develop PTSD. PTSD compromises self-reported general health outcome in injured adults independent of baseline status, Injury Severity Score, or degree of physical recovery. These data suggest that psychological morbidity is an important part of the patient's perceived general health.

Psychosocial factors limit outcomes after trauma.

BACKGROUND: Psychological morbidity compromises return to work after trauma. We demonstrate this relationship and present methods to identify risks for significant psychological morbidity. METHODS: Thirty-five adults were evaluated prospectively for return to functional employment after injury using demographic data, validated psychological and health measures, and the Michigan Critical Events Perception Scale. Evaluation was conducted at admission and at 1 and 5 months after injury. RESULTS: Poor return to work at 5 months was attributable to physical disability (p < 0.05) and psychological disturbance (p < 0.05) in a regression model that controlled for preinjury employment and psychopathologic factors as well as injury severity. A high score on the Impact of Events Scale administered during acute admission predicted development of acute stress disorder at 1 month (p < 0.01, odds ratio (OR) = 9.4) and posttraumatic stress disorder at 5 months (p < 0.05, OR = 6.7). Peritraumatic dissociation on the Michigan Critical Events Perception Scale was predictive for development of acute stress disorder (p < 0.05, OR = 5.8) at 1 month and posttraumatic stress disorder (p < 0.05, OR = 7.5) at 5 months. CONCLUSION: Psychological morbidity after injury compromises return to work independent of preinjury employment and psychopathologic condition, Injury Severity Score, or ambulation. A high Impact of Events Scale score or peritraumatic dissociation at admission predicts this morbidity.