Safety profile of anifrolumab in patients with active SLE: an integrated analysis of phase II and III trials.

OBJECTIVE: In phase II and III trials, anifrolumab, a human monoclonal antibody that binds type I interferon receptor subunit 1, has shown efficacy in adults with moderate to severe SLE. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of anifrolumab using data pooled from these trials to more precisely estimate the rate and severity of adverse events (AEs). METHODS: Data were pooled from patients receiving monthly intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg or placebo in MUSE, TULIP-1 and TULIP-2. Key safety endpoints included percentages and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of patients who experienced AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation and AEs of special interest. RESULTS: During treatment, 86.9% of patients receiving anifrolumab 300 mg (n=459) experienced AEs (≥1) versus 79.4% receiving placebo (n=466), and 4.1% versus 5.2% experienced an AE leading to discontinuation of investigational product. SAEs (≥1) were experienced by 11.8% and 16.7% of patients receiving anifrolumab and placebo, respectively (EAIR risk difference (95% CI) -7.2 (-12.5 to -1.9)), including lupus exacerbations classified as SAEs (1.5% and 3%, respectively). Infections occurred in 69.7% and 55.4% of patients receiving anifrolumab and placebo, respectively; difference in reported rates was driven by herpes zoster (HZ) and mild and moderate respiratory (excluding pneumonia) infections. The risk of HZ was increased with anifrolumab versus placebo (6.1% vs 1.3%, respectively; EAIR risk difference (95% CI) 5.4 (2.8 to 8.4)); most HZ events were mild or moderate, cutaneous and resolved without treatment discontinuation. Serious infections occurred in 4.8% and 5.6% of patients receiving anifrolumab and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis of 925 patients with moderate to severe SLE, monthly intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg was generally well tolerated over 52 weeks with an acceptable safety profile. Anifrolumab was associated with an increased incidence of HZ and respiratory tract infections and lower reported rate of SLE worsening as SAEs.

Mavrilimumab, a Fully Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor α Monoclonal Antibody: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Mavrilimumab, a human monoclonal antibody, targets granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor α. We undertook to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients in 2 phase IIb studies (1071 and 1107) and in 1 open-label extension study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01712399). METHODS: In study 1071, patients with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) received mavrilimumab (30, 100, or 150 mg) or placebo every other week plus methotrexate. In study 1107, patients with an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and/or DMARDs received 100 mg mavrilimumab every other week or 50 mg golimumab every 4 weeks plus methotrexate. Patients entering the open-label extension study received 100 mg mavrilimumab every other week plus methotrexate. Long-term safety and efficacy of mavrilimumab were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients received mavrilimumab (14 of 245 patients from study 1071, 9 of 70 patients from study 1107, and 52 of 397 patients from the open-label extension study discontinued mavrilimumab treatment throughout the studies). The cumulative safety exposure was 899 patient-years; the median duration of mavrilimumab treatment was 2.5 years (range 0.1-3.3 years). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were nasopharyngitis (n = 69; 7.68 per 100 patient-years) and bronchitis (n = 51; 5.68 per 100 patient-years). At weeks 74 and 104, 3.5% and 6.2% of patients, respectively, demonstrated reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, while 2.9% and 3.4% of patients, respectively, demonstrated reduction in forced vital capacity (>20% reduction from baseline to <80% predicted). Most pulmonary changes were transient and only infrequently associated with AEs. Mavrilimumab at 100 mg every other week demonstrated sustained efficacy; at week 122, 65.0% of patients achieved a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) of <3.2, and 40.6% of patients achieved a DAS28-CRP of <2.6. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with mavrilimumab maintained response and was well-tolerated with no increased incidence of treatment-emergent AEs. Safety data were comparable with those from both phase IIb qualifying studies.

Risk of Serious Infection for Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Starting Glucocorticoids with or without Antimalarials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare serious infection risk for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients starting glucocorticoids (GC), antimalarials (AM), or their combination. METHODS: We conducted a new-user, historical cohort study, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 1997-2013. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate adjusted HR and 95% CI. RESULTS: The study included 3030 patients with SLE followed an average of 4 years. Compared with patients starting AM without GC (9 infections/1461 patient-yrs), the HR for the risk of infection was 3.9 (95% CI 1.7-9.2) for those starting GC ≤ 15 mg/day without AM (14 infections/252 patient-yrs), while it was 0.0 (0 infections/128 patient-yrs) for those starting the combination. We split the 14 patients with a serious infection and with GC < 15 mg/day into 2 groups: < 7.5 and ≥ 7.5-15 mg/day. The HR for < 7.5 mg/day was 4.6 (95% CI 1.8-11.4) and for ≥ 7.5-15 mg/day, 3.1 (95% CI 1.0-9.7). For patients starting GC > 15 mg/day (reflecting more severe SLE), the risk of infection was nearly the same for the combination of GC and AM (9 infections/135 patient-yrs) and GC alone (41 infections/460 patient-yrs), but the combination users had evidence of more severe disease. Patients with SLE had a 6- to 7-fold greater risk of serious infection than the general population. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the benefits of AM treatment for SLE may extend to preventing serious infections. Although the study included > 3000 patients, the statistical power to examine GC dosages < 15 mg/day was poor.

Simulated driving changes in young adults with ADHD receiving mixed amphetamine salts extended release and atomoxetine.

BACKGROUND: Psychostimulant treatment may improve simulated driving performance in young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of simulated driving performance with mixed amphetamine salts-extended release (MAS XR) 50 mg/day (Cohort 1) and atomoxetine 80 mg/day (Cohort 2) in young adults with ADHD. RESULTS: Adults aged 19 to 25 years with AD/HD (N = 19) who were administered MAS XR significantly improved overall simulated driving performance versus placebo up to 12 hours after dosing. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in simulated-driving-performance scores between atomoxetine and placebo. At endpoint, MAS XR reduced ADHD Rating Scale scores > or = 30% in 80% of subjects, whereas atomoxetine achieved this level of improvement for 40%. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and use of simulated driving may limit generalizability of the findings. CONCLUSION: MAS XR in young adults with ADHD yields significant improvements in simulated driving performance and ADHD symptoms.

Cardiovascular effects of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in the treatment of school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR) was evaluated in 2968 children 6-12 years of age with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, noncomparative, community-based study, subjects whose symptoms of ADHD were well controlled with stimulant medication maintained their established treatment regimens for 2 weeks before enrollment into the current study. Subjects' regimens were then converted to an approximately equivalent once-daily dose of MAS XR 10, 20, or 30 mg/d according to a medication-conversion algorithm, which could be adjusted to 40 mg/d for optimal efficacy and tolerability. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and pulse were measured at each study visit. Twelve-lead electrocardiography was performed at screening and at the end of the extension phase or early termination. RESULTS: No clinically significant changes in BP or pulse were observed. Although one subject experienced a QT-prolongation interval > 25%, no clinically significant prolongation in the mean QT interval was seen. Approximately 2.5% of subjects demonstrated two consecutive SBP or DBP values > 95th percentile for age, sex, and height, and 3.6% of subjects' pulse increased by > or = 25 to > or = 110 beats per minute. No serious cardiovascular adverse events or deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to demonstrated efficacy and safety, the cardiovascular profile of MAS XR showed generally small divergences from age-specific population norms that pose very limited risk in this patient population.

A community assessment, open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in school-age children with ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR) in school-age children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treated in a community practice setting. METHODS: Children aged 6-12 years (N = 2968) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD entered a 9-week prospective, open-label, non-comparative study of MAS XR at 386 sites. For at least 2 weeks before enrollment, subjects with well-controlled ADHD received their consistent dose of previously prescribed psychostimulant. Subsequently, this regimen was converted to an equivalent once-daily dose of 10-, 20-, or 30-mg MAS XR, according to a conversion algorithm. Tolerability and safety were assessed based on reported treatment-emergent adverse events and observed changes in vital signs and body weight. Effectiveness was assessed using a parent-completed Conners' Global Index Scale (CGIS-P) measured 8 and 12 h postdose and a clinician-scored Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale after 1, 3, and 7 weeks of treatment. The dose of study medication could be adjusted at weeks 1 and 3 to a maximum of 40 mg/day. Outcome analyses used an intent-to-treat methodology, with last observations carried forward. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement in ADHD behavior 8 and 12 h postdose occurred during the first week of treatment and was maintained through study endpoint (p < 0.0001). Results of the investigator-rated CGI-I at weeks 1, 3, and 7 were consistent with the parent-rated CGIS-P results, indicating that MAS XR treatment significantly improved symptoms compared with the baseline stimulant regimen (p < 0.0001). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low, and most AEs were mild in intensity. CONCLUSION: MAS XR 10-40 mg is a safe and effective once-daily medication for treatment of children with ADHD in a community practice setting. ADHD symptoms may be further reduced by converting from current pharmacotherapy to an optimally titrated dose of MAS XR.

AACAP 2002 research forum: placebo and alternatives to placebo in randomized controlled trials in pediatric psychopharmacology.

OBJECTIVE: The use of placebo in the pediatric age group has come under increasing scrutiny. At the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the Academy's Workgroup on Research conducted a research forum. The purpose was to identify challenges and their solutions regarding the use of placebo in randomized controlled trials in pediatric psychopharmacology. METHOD: Workgroups focused on problems and solutions in five areas: ethics and human subjects, research design and statistics, partnering with consumers, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and pharmaceutical industry perspectives, and psychosocial treatments. RESULTS: In many but not all circumstances, inclusion of a placebo control is essential to meet the scientific goals of treatment outcome research. Innovative research designs; involvement of consumers in planning and implementing research; flexibility by industry, academia, the National Institutes of Health, and regulatory agencies acting in partnership; and concomitant use of evidence-based psychosocial services can and should assist in making placebo-controlled trials acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Properly designed placebo-controlled trials remain necessary, ethical, and feasible.