RESUMO
Background@#Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) represent a serious complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are associated with significant morbidity. While recent data suggest that Enterobacter cloacae is an emerging source of PJI, characteristics and outcomes of E. cloacae-associated infections are rarely described. The study aimed to present and describe the findings and outcomes of E. cloacae-associated PJI in our department. @*Methods@#This is a retrospective descriptive study of patients who underwent revision THA for E. cloacae-associated PJI between 2011 and 2020 and has a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Outcomes included organism characteristics as well as clinical outcomes, represented by the number of reoperations needed for PJI eradication and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) outcome reporting tool score. Of 108 revision THAs, 12 patients (11.1%) were diagnosed with E. cloacae-associated PJI. @*Results@#The majority of cases had a polymicrobial PJI (n=8, 66.7%). Five E. cloacae strains (41.7%) were gentamicin-resistant. Six patients (50.0%) underwent 2 or more revisions, while 3 of them (25.0%) required 4 or more revisions until their PJI was resolved. When utilizing the MSIS outcome score, the first surgical intervention was considered successful (MSIS score tiers 1 and 2) for 5 patients (41.7%) and failed (tiers 3 and 4) for 7 patients (58.3%). @*Conclusions@#E. cloacae is emerging as a common source of PJI following hip arthroplasty procedures. The findings of our study suggest that this pathogen is primarily of polymicrobial nature and represents high virulence and poor postoperative outcomes, as represented by both an increased number of required revision procedures and high rates of patients with MSIS outcome scores of 3 and 4. When managing patients with E. cloacae-associated PJI, surgeons should consider these characteristics and inform patients regarding predicted outcomes
RESUMO
Casirivimab/Imdevimab therapy reportedly retains neutralization potency against circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Delta (B.1.617.2), but there are sparse data on its clinical benefit against the Delta variant among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. We explored its therapeutic effect on COVID-19 severity outcome in terms of room air saturation <93% within 14 days of initial presentation and 45-day all-cause mortality among high-risk patients with SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infection and compared its effect between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care medical center between 6/2021 and 9/2021 and included patients who presented with a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 and fulfilled the criteria for Casirivimab/Imdevimab treatment. Of the 359 suitable patients (52% female, median age 63 years), 116 were treated with Casirivimab/Imdevimab and 243 were not. Two-hundred and one (56%) patients had received at least 2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Casirivimab/Imdevimab treatment was not an independent protective factor of COVID-19 severity outcome (multivariable analysis). Chronic kidney disease (aOR=3.51 [95%CI: 1.34-9.20], P=0.01), lower saturation levels (aOR=0.7 [95%CI: 0.58-0.85], P<0.01), abnormal chest x-ray findings (aOR=2.92, [95%CI: 1.24-6.87, P=0.01), and higher C-reactive protein levels (aOR=1.01 [95%CI: 1.00-1.01], P=0.008) were independent risk factors of COVID-19 severity. Positive immunization status was an independent protective factor (aOR=0.33 [95%CI: 0.14-0.77], P=0.01). A sub analysis of patients treated with Casirivimab/Imdevimab revealed no significant difference in COVID-19 severity between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. These findings demonstrate no added benefit of Casrivimab/Imdevinab treatment for high-risk patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infection, regardless of their vaccination status.
