Application of the "1-2-3-4-day" rule to stroke severity at baseline versus at 24 h to start direct oral anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation within 7 days from symptom onset.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the "1-2-3-4-day" rule applied to stroke severity at baseline versus at 24 h to start DOAC for AF within 7 days from symptom onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort observational study based on 433 consecutive AF-related stroke patients starting DOAC within 7 days from symptom onset. Four groups were identified according to the timing of DOAC introduction: 2-day, 3-day, 4-day, and 5-7-day. RESULTS: Three models of multivariate ordinal regression including unbalanced variables among four groups (enrolment year, dyslipidemia, known AF, thrombolysis, thrombectomy, hemorrhagic transformation, DOAC type) were used to estimate the association of neurological severity categories (reference: NIHSS > 15) at baseline (Brant test: 0.818), at 24 h (Brant test: 0.997), and radiological severity categories (reference: major infarct) at 24 h (Brant test: 0.902) in the direction of earlier DOAC introduction on days (from 5-7-day to 2-day). Number of deaths was higher in early DOAC group than in late DOAC group according to the "1-2-3-4-day" rule (5.4% versus 1.3%, 6.8% versus 1.1%, and 4.2% versus 1.7% when it was applied to baseline neurological severity, 24-h neurological and radiological severity, respectively), but no significant difference was found and deaths were not caused by early DOAC introduction. Rates of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage were not different between early and late DOAC groups. CONCLUSIONS: The application of "1-2-3-4-day" rule to start DOAC for AF within 7 days from symptom onset differed when applied to baseline neurological stroke severity versus 24-h neurological and radiological severity, but safety and effecacy are similar.

Thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion and concomitant subarachnoid hemorrhage.

To report our experience in treating one patient with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and concurrent acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessels occlusion (LVO). A man in his 50 s presented with acute right hemiparesis and aphasia. Brain CT showed a SAH in the left central sulcus; CT-angiography revealed a tandem occlusion of the left internal carotid artery and homolateral middle cerebral artery. He underwent an angiographic procedure with successful recanalization. Follow-up CT demonstrated a striatal-lenticular stroke without SAH progression. While the absolute contraindication to IVT during intracranial bleeding remains unquestionable, the potential injury/benefit from MT is still debatable. Such cases constitute a blind spot in the guidelines where physicians face the dilemma of choosing between an acute endovascular treatment with the risks of hemorrhage progression and a conservative treatment with the associated poor clinical outcome. We decided to treat our patient invasively, considering the young age, also given the absence of prognostic factors that generally predict post-procedural reperfusion injury. We believe that, in similar cases, MT should be considered-despite not free of risks and drawbacks-to avoid the detrimental consequences of untreated AIS from LVO.

Factors influencing cognitive performance after 1-year treatment with direct oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous ischemic stroke: a pilot study.

Anticoagulant treatment as stroke prevention, particularly direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), may reduce the risk of dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess factors influencing cognitive performance after 1-year treatment with DOAC in patients with AF and previous ischemic stroke. We recruited 33 ischemic stroke patients who were discharged from Verona Stroke Unit with diagnosis of AF and prescription of treatment with DOAC. For each cognitive test, we estimated the effect of T0 (first session) variables on T1 (1-year session) cognitive performance using ordinal logistic regression fitted to a 1 point-shift from 4 to 0 on ESs. The effect of T0 clinical variables was presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) after adjustment for T0 total score of the corresponding cognitive test. Sustained AF (OR: 4.259, 95% CI 1.071-16.942) and ischemic heart disease (OR: 6.654, 95% CI 1.329-33.300) showed a significant effect on T1 MoCA Test; congestive heart failure on T1 RAVLT Immediate recall (OR: 9.128, 95% CI 1.055-78.995), T1 RAVLT Delayed recall (OR: 7.134, 95% CI 1.214-52.760), and T1 Trail Making Test (Part A) (OR: 16.989, 95% CI 1.765-163.565); sustained AF (OR: 5.055, 95% CI 1.224-20.878) and hyperlipidemia (OR: 4.764, 95% CI 1.175-19.310) on T1 Digit span forward Test; ischemic heart disease (aOR: 8.460, 95% CI 1.364-52.471) on T1 Stroop Color and Word Test (time); Dabigatran use (aOR: 0.084, 95% CI 0.013-0.544) on FAB; age ≥ 75 years (aOR: 0.058, 95% CI 0.006-0.563) and hyperlipidemia (aOR: 5.809, 95% CI 1.059-31.870) on T1 Phonemic word fluency Test; female sex (aOR: 6.105, 95% CI 1.146-32.519), hyperlipidemia (aOR: 21.099, 95% CI 2.773-160.564), total Modified Fazekas Scale score > 1 (aOR: 78.530, 95% CI 3.131-1969.512) on Semantic word fluency Test. Sustained AF, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and female sex were the factors influencing cognitive performance after 1-year treatment with DOAC in patients with AF and previous ischemic stroke. Modified Fazekas Scale score in the first session was the only radiological variable that had a significant effect on cognitive performance.

The dispersion of myocardial repolarization in ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Markers of dispersion of myocardial repolarization have been proposed to identify the patients at higher risk of malignant arrhythmic events. The aim of the present study is to assess a possible association of the electrocardiografic (ECG) markers of the dispersion of repolarization with the type of stroke, involvement of insula, neurological severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS score), and disability (modified Rankin Scale, mRS score) in patients with a cerebrovascular event. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis based on data prospectively collected from consecutive patients with a cerebrovascular event who underwent 12­lead ECG at admission to the Verona Stroke Unit. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients included in the study, 55 had ischemic stroke and 8 intracranial hemorrhage. TpTe (time between the peak and the end of the T wave) and TpTe/QTc (TpTe/corrected time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave) in lead V5 were higher in intracranial hemorrhage than in ischemic stroke (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively) and QT max (the longest QT calculated in the 12 leads) was higher in patients with involvement of insula (p ≤ 0.01). A correlation was found between QTc max and NIHSS score at admission (p = 0.02), QT max and NIHSS score at discharge (p = 0.05), and QT max and mRS score at discharge (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: TpTe and TpTe/QTc in V5 lead were associated with intracranial hemorrhage and QT max was associated with involvement of insula. The prolongation of QT was correlated with neurological severity and disability.

Introduction of direct oral anticoagulant within 7 days of stroke onset: a nomogram to predict the probability of 3-month modified Rankin Scale score > 2.

In clinical practice, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are often started earlier (≤ 7 days) than in randomized clinical trials after stroke. We aimed to develop a nomogram model incorporating time of DOAC introduction ≤ 7 days of stroke onset in combination with different degrees of stroke radiological/neurological severity at the time of treatment to predict the probability of unfavorable outcome. We conducted a multicenter prospective study including 344 patients who started DOAC 1-7 days after atrial fibrillation-related stroke onset. Computed tomography scan 24-36 h after stroke onset was performed in all patients before starting DOAC. Unfavorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2 at 3 months. Based on multivariate logistic model, the nomogram was generated. We assessed the discriminative performance by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and calibration of risk prediction model by using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Onset-to-treatment time for DOAC (OR: 1.21, p = 0.030), NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at the time of treatment (OR: 1.00 for NIHSS = 0-5; OR: 2.67, p = 0.016 for NIHSS = 6-9; OR: 26.70, p < 0.001 for NIHSS = 10-14; OR: 57.48, p < 0.001 for NIHSS ≥ 15), size infarct (OR: 1.00 for small infarct; OR: 2.26, p = 0.023 for medium infarct; OR: 3.40, p = 0.005 for large infarct), and age ≥ 80 years (OR: 1.96, p = 0.028) remained independent predictors of unfavorable outcome to compose the nomogram. The AUC-ROC of nomogram was 0.858. Calibration was good (p = 2.889 for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test). The combination of onset-to-treatment time of DOAC with stroke radiological/neurological severity at the time of treatment and old age may predict the probability of unfavorable outcome.

A nomogram to predict the probability of mortality after first-ever acute manifestations of cerebral small vessel disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Symptomatic lacunar stroke (LS) and deep intracerebral hemorrhage (dICH) represent the acute manifestations of type 1 cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). Recently, two studies showed that the risk factor profile of dICH differs from that associated with LS in subjects with biologically plausible cSVD; however, the prognostic predictors after acute manifestations are currently lacking. We aimed to develop a nomogram for individualized prediction of the mortality probability in a cohort of patients with a first-ever acute manifestation of biologically plausible cSVD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from consecutive patients with acute symptomatic non-embolic LS or primary dICH. The outcome measure was 3-month mortality. Based on multivariate logistic model, the nomogram was generated. RESULTS: Of the 288 patients who entered into the study for biologically plausible cSVD, 131 (45%) experienced a LS and 157 (55%) a dICH. After multivariate logistic regression, 5 variables remained predictors of mortality to compose the nomogram: dICH (OR:11.36; p=0.001), severe presentation (OR:8.08; p<0.001), age (OR:1.08; p=0.001), glucose (OR:1.23; p=0.003) and creatinine (OR:1.01; p=0.024) at admission were predictors of mortality. The discriminative performance of nomogram assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.898. The model was internally validated by using bootstrap (1000 samples) with AUC-ROC of 0.895 and cross-validation (deleted-d method repeated 1000 times) with AUC-ROC of 0.895. CONCLUSIONS: We developed the first nomogram for prediction of the mortality probability in a cohort of patients with a first-ever acute manifestation of biologically plausible cSVD.

Association of hyperglycemia, systolic and diastolic hypertension, and hyperthermia relative to baseline in the acute phase of stroke with poor outcome after intravenous thrombolysis.

: In the acute phase of ischemic stroke, the trend of some physiological variables, such as blood glucose (BG), blood pressure, and body temperature (BT), might influence outcome. We aimed to assess the association of hyperglycemia, systolic and diastolic hypertension, and hyperthermia relative to baseline BG, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and BT, respectively, in the first 12 h with poor outcome after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected from 200 consecutive anterior ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT. Outcome measures were no neurological improvement at 24 h (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24 h ≥NIHSS score at baseline), and unfavorable functional outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 3-6] at 3 months. No neurological improvement at 24 h was noted in 52 (26%) patients and mRS 3-6 at 3 months in 68 (34%) patients. The multivariate analyses showed that odds ratios (ORs) for no neurological improvement at 24 h were higher in patients with hyperglycemia relative to baseline [OR 3.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-8.57, P = 0.006], and hyperthermia relative to baseline (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.20-6.91, P = 0.018). OR for 3-month mRS score 3-6 was higher in patients with hyperthermia relative to baseline (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.20-7.74, P = 0.019). Hyperglycemia and hyperthermia relative to baseline in the first 12 h after IVT are associated with no neurological improvement at 24 h. Hyperthermia relative to baseline is also associated with unfavorable functional outcome at 3 months.

Clinical outcomes of secondary prevention strategies for young patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale.

Background The aim of this study was to compare the immediate and long-term clinical outcomes of medical therapy and percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure as secondary prevention strategies in patients younger than 55 years of age presenting with cryptogenic stroke and PFO. Methods Between January 2006 and April 2015, all patients with the diagnosis of cryptogenic stroke and PFO were analysed and prospectively followed. Stroke was confirmed in 159 out of 309 patients (51%). In the remaining cases, other neurological conditions were found and therefore excluded from further analysis. Patients received PFO closure or medical therapy on the basis of a pre-specified algorithm. Primary outcome was the assessment of recurrent ischaemic events at follow-up. Results Percutaneous PFO closure was performed in 77 patients (48%) and 82 (52%) were treated medically. Mean follow-up was 51.6 ± 34.8 months. Two ischaemic strokes occurred in the medical group only (2.4% vs 0%; P = 0.16) and no complications related to the invasive procedure were observed. Conclusions The diagnosis of stroke in patients with PFO could be confirmed in 50% of cases only, underlining the importance of a multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients. A very low ischaemic recurrence rate was observed in the medical therapy group, suggesting that a personalized treatment based on a prespecified diagnostic algorithm yields good clinical results irrespective of the treatment modality. Given the low number of recurrences, larger cohorts may be needed to prove significant differences.

Stroke etiologic subtype may influence the rate of hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign disappearance after intravenous thrombolysis.

Disappearance of hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (HMCAS) on non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) scan is a reliable sign of arterial recanalization after intravenous (IV) thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess whether stroke etiologic subtype may influence the rate of HMCAS disappearance and the clinical outcome after IV thrombolysis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected from 1031 consecutive stroke patients treated with IV thrombolysis. Outcome measures were HMCAS disappearance on follow-up CT scan within 22-36 h of IV thrombolysis, neurologic improvement (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤4 points from baseline or NIHSS score of 0) at 7 days, and modified rankin scale (mRS) ≤1 at 3 months. Of 256 patients with HMCAS on admission CT scan, 125 had a cardioembolic stroke, 67 a stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), 58 a stroke of undetermined etiology, and six a stroke secondary to carotid artery dissection. HMCAS disappearance occurred in 145 (56.6 %) patients, neurologic improvement in 122 (55.0 %) patients, and mRS ≤1 in 64 (32.8 %) patients. Compared with cardioembolic stroke patients, patients with stroke due to LAA had lower odds ratios (OR) for HMCAS disappearance (OR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.15-0.58, p < 0.001), neurologic improvement (OR 0.42, 95 % CI 0.22-0.82, p = 0.011), and mRS ≤1 (OR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.06-0.52, p = 0.002). No significant differences in outcome measures were found between cardioembolic strokes and strokes of undetermined etiology. This study suggests that stroke due to LAA is associated with lower rates of HMCAS disappearance, neurologic improvement, and mRS ≤1 after IV thrombolysis, compared with cardioembolic stroke.

Reasons for exclusion from intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients admitted to the Stroke Unit.

Intravenous (IV) thrombolysis is the treatment in ischemic stroke, but only the minority of patients receive this medication. The primary objective of this study was to explore the reasons associated with the decision not to offer IV thrombolysis to stroke patients admitted to the Stroke Unit (SU). We conducted a retrospective analysis based on data collected from 876 consecutive stroke patients admitted to the SU <12 h of symptoms onset, treated or not with IV thrombolysis at the discretion of the treating neurologist. Of the 876 patients, 449 were thrombolysed and 427 non-thrombolysed. Stroke onset >4.5 h (p = 0.001) and unknown time of onset (or stroke present on awakening) (p = 0.004) were reasons listed in the current SPC of Actilyse reasons for exclusion even they occurred singly, whereas mild deficit (or rapidly improving symptoms) (p < 0.001), extra-cranial conditions with increased risk of bleeding (p = 0.004), and history of SNC diseases (p = 0.001) only when they occurred in combination. Severe pre-stroke disability (p = 0.003) was extra-SPC reason for exclusion even when it occurred singly, whereas early CT hypodensity (p < 0.001) only when it occurred in combination. After stratification for intra-SPC reasons for exclusion, early CT hypodensity was associated with decision not offer IV thrombolysis in patients with mild deficit (p < 0.001), age >80 years (p < 0.001), stroke onset >4.5 h (p = 0.005), and unknown time of onset (p = 0.037), while severe pre-stroke disability (p = 0.025) and admission under non-stroke specialist neurologist assessment (p = 0.018) in patients with age >80 years. There are often unjustified reasons for exclusion from IV thrombolysis in SU.

Bilateral internal carotid artery dissection associated with prior syphilis: a case report and review of the literature.

Bilateral internal carotid artery dissection is a rare entity, and its presentation may include cerebral ischemia. We describe the case of a 69-year-old man with ischemic stroke and radiological evidence of intimal flap of both internal carotid arteries suggestive for dissection. During the hospitalization, our patient was found positive for a previous syphilis infection. We conducted a review of the literature, with evidence of a few cases of ischemic stroke presumably related to a prior syphilis. The absence of major cardiovascular risk factors in our patient leads us to believe that an etiopathogenetic link may exist between these two conditions.

The etiologic subtype of intracerebral hemorrhage may influence the risk of significant hematoma expansion.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) growth is an important independent predictor of clinical deterioration and outcome. Little is known about the association between etiology of ICH and occurrence of hematoma expansion (HE). The aim of the present study was to assess whether ICH etiologic subtype may influence the risk of significant HE. METHODS: We conducted an analysis on retrospectively collected data of 424 consecutive patients with ICH, who were admitted to the Verona General Hospital, from March 2011 to December 2014. Using the SMASH-U (Structural vascular lesions, Medication, Amyloid angiopathy, Systemic disease, Hypertension, or Undetermined) classification, we identified the ICH etiologic subtypes. Outcome measure was significant HE (an absolute increase in ICH volume>12.5 mL or >50%) within 48 h. RESULTS: Significant HE occurred in 11/57 (19.3%) Amyloid, 7/14 (50%) Structural, 31/57 (54.4%) Medication, 25/44 (56.8%) in Systemic, 62/139 (44.6%) Hypertensive, and 21/68 (30.9%) Undetermined ICH. Baseline ICH volume (OR 1.011 per mL, 95% CI 1.006-1.017, p<0.001) and onset-to-baseline CT time (OR 0.919 per hour, 95% CI 0.852-0.990, p=0.027) were predictors of significant HE. Compared with Amyloid ICH, ORs for significant HE were higher in patients with Structural ICH (OR 1.430, 95% CI 1.060-1.948, p=0.023), Medication ICH (OR 4.344, 95% CI 1.382-13.653, p=0.012), Systemic ICH (OR 1.796, 95% CI 1.070-3.015, p=0.027), and Hypertensive ICH (OR 3.081, 95% CI 1.426-6.655, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that Structural, Medication, Systemic, and Hypertensive ICH were the etiologic subtypes associated with a higher risk of significant HE, compared with Amyloid ICH patients.

Yield of ultra-rapid carotid ultrasound and stroke specialist assessment in patients with TIA and minor stroke: an Italian TIA service audit.

In Italy the vast majority of TIA and minor strokes are seen in the A&E. Early diagnosis and management of TIA and minor stroke in this setting is habitually difficult and often lead to cost-ineffective hospital admissions. We set up an ultra-rapid TIA service run by neurovascular physicians based on early specialist assessment and ultrasound vascular imaging. We audit the clinical effectiveness and feasibility of the service and the impact of this service on TIA and minor strokes hospital admissions. We compared the rate of TIA and minor stroke admissions/discharges in the year before (T0) and in the year during which the TIA service was operating (T1). At T1 57 patients had specialist evaluation and 51 (89.5 %) of them were discharged home. Two (3.5 %) patients had recurrent symptoms after discharge. Seven had a pathological carotid Doppler ultrasound. Four of them had hospital admission and subsequent carotid endoarterectomy within a week. Taking the whole neurology department into consideration at T1 there was a 30-41 % reduction in discharges of patients with TIA or minor stroke. Taking the stroke unit section into consideration at T1 there was a 25 % reduction in admissions of patients with NIHSS score <4 and 40 % reduction in admissions of patients with Barthel Index above 80. The model of TIA service we implemented based on ultra-rapid stroke physician assessment and carotid ultrasound investigation is feasible and clinically valid. Indirect evidence suggests that it reduced the rate of expensive TIA/minor stroke hospital admissions.

Off-label thrombolysis versus full adherence to the current European Alteplase license: impact on early clinical outcomes after acute ischemic stroke.

According to current European Alteplase license, therapeutic-window for intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke has recently been extended to 4.5 h after symptoms onset. However, due to numerous contraindications, the portion of patients eligible for treatment still remains limited. Early neurological status after thrombolysis could identify more faithfully the impact of off-label Alteplase use that long-term functional outcome. We aimed to identify the impact of off-label thrombolysis and each off-label criterion on early clinical outcomes compared with the current European Alteplase license. We conducted an analysis on prospectively collected data of 500 consecutive thrombolysed patients. The primary outcome measures included major neurological improvement (NIHSS score decrease of ≤8 points from baseline or NIHSS score of 0) and neurological deterioration (NIHSS score increase of ≥4 points from baseline or death) at 24 h. We estimated the independent effect of off-label thrombolysis and each off-label criterion by calculating the odds ratio (OR) with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome measure. As the reference, we used patients fully adhering to the current European Alteplase license. 237 (47.4%) patients were treated with IV thrombolysis beyond the current European Alteplase license. We did not find significant differences between off- and on-label thrombolysis on early clinical outcomes. No off-label criteria were associated with decreased rate of major neurological improvement compared with on-label thrombolysis. History of stroke and concomitant diabetes was the only off-label criterion associated with increased rate of neurological deterioration (OR 5.84, 95% CI 1.61-21.19; p = 0.024). Off-label thrombolysis may be less effective at 24 h than on-label Alteplase use in patients with previous stroke and concomitant diabetes. Instead, the impact of other off-label criteria on early clinical outcomes was not different compared with current European Alteplase license.

The risk stratification based on the CHA2DS2-VASc may predict the response to intravenous thrombolysis after stroke.

CHA2DS2-VASc score influences the outcome in stroke patients with or without atrial fibrillation (AF). We assessed whether the risk stratification based on the prestroke CHA2DS2-VASc score may predict the response to intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in stroke patients. We conducted an analysis on prospectively collected data of 516 consecutive AF and non-AF patients treated with IV thrombolysis. Outcome measures were major improvement (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤8 points from baseline or NIHSS score 0) and deterioration (death or NIHSS ≥1 points from baseline) or no improvement (NIHSS score equivalent to baseline) at 24 h; excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≤1) and unfavorable outcome (mRS score >2) at 3 months. Multivariate analysis showed that ORs for major improvement and excellent outcome were lower in patients with intermediate risk (CHA2DS2-VASc = 1) (OR 0.39, 95 % CI 0.16-0.92, p = 0.032; OR 0.10, 95 % CI 0.02-0.56, p = 0.009), moderately high risk (CHA2DS2-VASc = 2) (OR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.19-0.96, p = 0.040; OR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.03-0.76, p = 0.022), and very high risk (CHA2DS2-VASc > 3) (OR 0.31, 95 % CI 0.15-0.65, p = 0.002; OR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.04-0.81, p = 0.026), whereas ORs for deterioration or no improvement and unfavorable outcome were higher only in patients with very high risk (OR 4.26, 95 % CI 1.24-14.65, p = 0.021; OR 9.26, 95 % CI 1.15-74.65, p = 0.037), compared with low risk (CHA2DS2-VASc = 0). Low-risk level based on the prestroke CHA2DS2-VASc score was predictor of effective response to IV thrombolysis. Very high-risk level was predictor of failed response, compared with low-risk level.

Intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in patients with current malignant neoplasm.

BACKGROUND: The current European license for Alteplase in acute ischemic stroke excludes the patients who have neoplasm with increased bleeding, but this criterion is not clearly defined. The aim of the present study is to assess whether intravenous (IV) thrombolysis is safe and effective in patients with current non-malignant neoplasm in absence of metastatic disease or other additional risk factors of bleeding. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical characteristics of 11 thrombolysed patients with current malignant neoplasm. We decided to treat only patients who did not have one or more of the following additional risk factors of bleeding: metastatic malignant disease; recent bleeding; documented hemorrhagic diathesis, also including baseline normal platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time value; and anticoagulant treatment on admission. RESULTS: Cancer was diagnosed before IV thrombolysis in 9 patients, while non-metastatic malignant disease was incidentally detected after IV thrombolysis in 2 patients. None of the patients showed severe hemorrhagic complications. At 7days, all patients that showed a reduction of 4 points or more in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale from baseline were asymptomatic. At 3months, functional outcome was favorable in 7 (73%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that IV thrombolysis does not appear to increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications in current non-metastatic cancer patients in absence of additional risk factors of bleeding. In addition, these patients showed clinical improvement after IV thrombolysis, although replication of our findings in a randomized controlled trial is required to confirm our results.