[Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair without arteriotomy (Perclose system)]. / Perkutane endoprothetische Therapie des Aortenaneurysmas ohne Arteriotomie.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is common clinical practice to perform an arteriotomy for the endovascular treatment of infrarenal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Instead we used the percutaneous endovascular Perclose device to perform the aneurysm repair without arterial cut-down. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Perclose device contains four needles with two suture loops for closing the femoral artery access site. The sutures were deployed after the arterial puncture, before introduction of sheaths (diameter 12 - 27 F = 4 - 9 mm). After the procedure the sutures were used to close the puncture site. We attempted to achieve hemostasis with the Perclose system in 104 femoral arteries in 60 patients (7 females, mean age 69 +/- 12 years). The mean vessel diameter was 10 +/- 2 mm. RESULTS: The percutaneous graft implantation was successfully achieved in 58 of 60 patients. The graft could not be forwarded into the aorta in two cases because of calcified iliac arteries. The Perclose suture technique was successfully used in 97 femoral arteries. In one case a false aneurysm developed and in another case a secondary hemorrhage occurred. Seven patients needed additional manual compression to achieve complete hemostasis. A surgical repair was not necessary. The time to hospital discharge ranged from 4.5 hours to 32 days (median: 18 hours). 20 patients stayed longer than 24 h in the hospital, only 2 of them for reasons related to the puncture site. CONCLUSION: Closing the access site with the Perclose system is technically feasible and effective, even with large sheaths up to 27 F = 9 mm. This technique reduces the invasiveness of the endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms and decreases the length of hospital stay, i. e. it allows treatment in outpatients.

How reliable is atrial sensing in single-lead VDD pacing: comparison of three systems.

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the reliability of atrial sensing, expressed as AV synchronous stimulation, in three VDD systems with the atrial sensitivity (AS) programmed to a conventional value with a 2:1 safety margin compared to most-sensitive values. We studied 34 sex- and age-matched patients with 3 VDD systems: 14 with Unity 292-07, 10 with Saphir 600, and 10 with Thera VDD (5 model 8948 and 5 model 8968i). Two 24-hour Holters were performed on consecutive days. The AS was programmed in a randomized order to its most-sensitive value or to a 2:1 safety margin. All other parameters were programmed identically. The patients underwent a myopotential oversensing test and a daily life activity protocol. A beat-to-beat analysis of the Holters was performed to determine AV synchrony. For the entire group AV synchrony with conventional AS was 98.63% +/- 2.57%, compared to 99.80% +/- 0.43% with most-sensitive values (p = 0.002). There was no difference between the three systems with conventional AS. With the most-sensitive AS, AV synchrony was: Unity 99.99% +/- 0.03%, Saphir 99.42% +/- 0.60% (P = 0.002), Thera 99.81% +/- 0.35% (ns). In the Saphir system with an atrial blanking period of 150 ms, ventricular far-field sensing could be demonstrated in 5 of 10 patients. This reduced the percentage of AV synchrony due to an unwanted mode-switch to a nontracking mode. Myopotential oversensing was not detected in any patient. CONCLUSION: The VDD systems tested under identical conditions showed reliable P wave sensing at the most-sensitive atrial sensing setting without myopotential oversensing. Ventricular far-field sensing reduced AV synchrony and must be avoided by appropriate refractory periods.

Holter recordings with continuous marker annotations: a new tool in pacemaker diagnostics.

UNLABELLED: Pacemakers provide marker annotations to facilitate the interpretation of pacemaker electrocardiograms (ECGs) and can be used in cases of suspected pacemaker malfunction or to understand pacemaker behavior. Due to the need for a programmer, only short-term evaluations are possible. We evaluated a prototype Telemetry Data Logger (TDL) designed to continuously transfer markers from the pacemaker to a conventional Holter recorder. A miniaturized telemetry receiving coil was attached to patient's skin above the pacemaker, which was programmed to transmit markers continuously. The TDL, which receives and converts markers into eight positive and eight negative deflections, ranging from -2.5 to +2.5 mV in amplitude, was connected to one channel of a conventional Holter recorder (Tracker 2). We performed 20 Holters in 13 patients who had implanted VDDR or DDDR devices from the same manufacturer and evaluated three versions of software. Marker transmission was possible in all patients, producing Holter ECGs with complete marker annotations. Artifacts occurred < 4% of the time. A 50-ms rectangular pulse was optimal for marker interpretation. The device, which was easy to use and well accepted by the patients, assisted in the diagnosis of inappropriate pacemaker programming, even when the surface ECG seemed to show regular pacemaker function. In the presence of low quality surface ECGs, marker annotations allowed the assessment of pacemaker function. The capability to annotate the onset of special algorithms, like tachycardia termination algorithms or mode switching, facilitates interpretation of pacemaker behavior, enabling a reliable assessment of the appropriateness of such algorithms. CONCLUSION: The TDL effectively enables pacemaker markers to be inscribed onto a conventional Holter recording, facilitating the interpretation of pacemaker ECGs and the diagnosis of inappropriate pacemaker programming even when not discernible from the surface ECG alone.