Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trop Med Int Health ; 11(4): 432-40, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16553926

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of routine malaria microscopy, and appropriate use and interpretation of malaria slides under operational conditions in Kenya. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey, using a range of quality of care assessment tools, at government facilities with malaria microscopy in two Kenyan districts of different intensity of malaria transmission. All patients older than 5 years presenting to outpatient departments were enrolled. Two expert microscopists assessed the accuracy of the routine malaria slide results. RESULTS: We analysed 359 consultations performed by 31 clinicians at 17 facilities. Clinical assessment was suboptimal. Blood slide microscopy was performed for 72.7% of patients, who represented 78.5% of febrile patients and 51.3% of afebrile patients. About 95.5% of patients with a positive malaria microscopy result and 79.3% of patients with a negative result received antimalarial treatment. Sulphadoxine-pyremethamine monotherapy was more commonly prescribed for patients with a negative test result (60.7%) than for patients with a positive result (32.4%). Conversely, amodiaquine or quinine were prescribed for only 14.7% of patients with a negative malaria microscopy result compared to 57.7% of patients with a positive result. The prevalence of confirmed malaria was low in both high (10.0%) and low-(16.3%) transmission settings. Combining data from both settings, the sensitivity of routine microscopy was 68.6%; its specificity, 61.5%; its positive predictive value, 21.6% and its negative predictive value, 92.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefits of microscopy are currently not realised because of the poor quality of routine testing and irrational clinical practices. Ambiguous clinical guidelines permitting treatment of older children and adults with a negative blood slide also undermine rational use of antimalarial drugs.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Amodiaquina/uso terapêutico , Administração de Caso , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Malária Falciparum/diagnóstico , Malária Falciparum/epidemiologia , Microscopia/métodos , Parasitemia/diagnóstico , Parasitemia/tratamento farmacológico , Parasitemia/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Prevalência , Pirimetamina/uso terapêutico , Quinina/uso terapêutico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sulfadoxina/uso terapêutico
3.
Int J Epidemiol ; 33(5): 1080-91, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15256523

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: When replacing failing drugs for malaria with more effective drugs, an important step towards reducing the malaria burden is that health workers (HW) prescribe drugs according to evidence-based guidelines. Past studies have shown that HW commonly do not follow guidelines, yet few studies have explored with appropriate methods why such practices occur. METHODS: We analysed data from a survey of government health facilities in four Kenyan districts in which HW consultations were observed, caretakers and HW were interviewed, and health facility assessments were performed. The analysis was limited to children 2-59 months old with uncomplicated malaria. Treatment was defined as recommended (antimalarial recommended by national guidelines), a minor error (effective, but non-recommended antimalarial), or inappropriate (no effective antimalarial). RESULTS: We evaluated 1006 consultations performed by 135 HW at 81 facilities: 567 children received recommended treatment, 314 had minor errors, and 125 received inappropriate treatment (weighted percentages: 56.9%, 30.4%, and 12.7%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that programmatic interventions such as in-service malaria training, provision of guidelines and wall charts, and more frequent supervision were significantly associated with better treatment quality. However, neither in-service training nor possession of the guideline document showed an effect by itself. More qualified HW made more errors: both major and minor errors (but generally more minor errors) when second-line drugs were in stock, and more major errors when second-line drugs were not in stock. Child factors such as age and a main complaint of fever were also associated with treatment quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of several programmatic strategies that can redress HW deficiencies in malaria treatment. Targeted cost-effectiveness trials would help refine these strategies and provide more precise guidance on affordable and effective ways to strengthen and maintain HW practices.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Competência Clínica , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Quênia , Masculino , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Estatal/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...