Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears.

The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of universal collection medium (UCM) liquid-based cytology (LBC) (Digene Corp., MD) and the conventional Pap smear in a comparative study, using histologic results as the gold standard. This was a cross-sectional study. Conventional Pap smears and UCM LBC specimens, obtained from women in a low socioeconomic outpatient population referred to a tertiary center for gynecologic care, were compared. For the purpose of this study, when cervical specimens were collected for cytology, all women underwent colposcopy and biopsy was done if a cervical abnormality was observed. Cytologic evaluation of UCM LBC and conventional Pap smears were carried out separately, masked to the results of the other method. Agreement beyond chance between the two cytologic methods was ascertained by means of the unweighted kappa statistic. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for both methods. McNemar's test was used to determine the level of association between the two cytology procedures. A total of 800 women were evaluated. Assessment of the overall agreement between the two cytologic methods yielded a kappa of 0.777 (P < 0.0001). After adjustment for histologic diagnosis, the computed kappa in each stratum was as follows: normal = 0.733; CIN 1 = 0.631; CIN 2/3 = 0.735; cancer = 0.652. The sensitivity and specificity of UCM LBC for detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions and cancer were 75.3% and 86.4%, respectively, not statistically different from the 81.8% and 85.2% seen with the conventional method. This study demonstrates that the UCM LBC method is as accurate as the conventional Pap smear cytology in detecting cervical intraepithelial lesions and cancer even so the UCM samples were systematically prepared from a second sampling of the cervix.

Baseline cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and risk for cervical neoplasia: a 10-year cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Annual Pap smear screening has been favored over less frequent screening in the United States to minimize the risk of cervical cancer. We evaluated whether simultaneous screening with a Pap test and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is useful for assessing the risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cervical cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 23 702 subjects in a study of HPV infection at Kaiser Permanente, Northwest Division, Portland, OR. Data were analyzed for 20 810 volunteers who were at least 16 years old (mean = 35.9 years) with satisfactory baseline Pap tests and suitable samples for HPV testing. Women were followed for up to 122 months (from April 1, 1989, to June 30, 1999) to determine the risk for histopathologically confirmed CIN3 or cancer. RESULTS: Among 171 women with CIN3 or cancer diagnosed over 122 months, 123 (71.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 65.2% to 78.7%) had baseline Pap results of atypical squamous cells or worse and/or a positive HPV test, including 102 (86.4%, 95% CI = 80.3% to 92.6%) of the 118 cases diagnosed within the first 45 months of follow-up. During this 45-month period, the cumulative incidence of CIN3 or cancer was 4.54% (95% CI = 3.61% to 5.46%) among women with a Pap test result of atypical squamous cells or worse, positive HPV tests, or both compared with 0.16% (95% CI = 0.08% to 0.24%) among women with negative Pap and HPV tests. Age, screening behavior, a history of cervical cancer precursors, and a history of treatment for CIN minimally affected results. CONCLUSIONS: Negative baseline Pap and HPV tests were associated with a low risk for CIN3 or cancer in the subsequent 45 months, largely because a negative HPV test was associated with a decreased risk of cervical neoplasia. Negative combined test results should provide added reassurance for lengthening the screening interval among low-risk women, whereas positive results identify a relatively small subgroup that requires more frequent surveillance.

Comparative analysis of a liquid-based Pap test and concurrent HPV DNA assay of residual samples. A study of 608 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively study the HPV DNA assay of residual samples from the ThinPrep Pap Test (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) PreserveCyt (Cytyc) vial as a quality improvement (QI) indicator for management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Six hundred eight residual sample vials of liquid-based Pap-Test specimens were selected for the study based on Pap-test results from October 1998 to March 2001. The specimen vials were forwarded to the reference laboratory (American Medical Laboratories, Chantilly, Virginia, U.S.A.) for HPV DNA assay using the Hybrid Capture System method (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.). At the time of HPV DNA assay, the residual samples were between 8 days to 10 months old, and each vial contained 4 mL. Of the 608 study cases, 76 were WNL, 115 contained BCC, 172 contained ASCUS, 179 were LSIL and 66 were HSIL. In this study, the 191 WNL and BCC cases were designated as the disease-free control group. The HPV DNA typing results were reported as low-risk, high/intermediate-risk or HPV DNA "not detected" HPV types. The HPV DNA testing results were compared to the Pap-Test diagnoses and statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: The following information reflects the percentage of HPV DNA-positive cases based on the Pap-Test diagnoses: 16.2% in WNL and BCC, 51.1% in ASCUS, 94.4% in LSIL and 98.4% in HSIL. Sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%), false negative value (4.4%), false positive value (16.2%) and predictive value of a positive (88.3%) and negative (93.5%) Pap-Test were calculated on the basis of HPV DNA testing results for 436 cases that were diagnosed as either SIL or negative (WNL and BCC). ASCUS (172) Pap-Test cases were considered borderline--disease positive and excluded from statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: The HPV DNA assay of residual samples from ThinPrep Pap-Test liquid-based specimens is an objective adjunct to the gynecologic cytology QI protocol and is the gold standard reference test for triaging women with equivocal cytologic diagnoses. The great value of HPV DNA testing is its high sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%) and negative predictive value (93.5%). HPV DNA testing results can be used as a tool to better determine the need for referrals for colposcopic biopsy, especially for patients with an ASCUS diagnosis. The residual Pap-Test specimens are stable and reproducible for HPV DNA typing. A working flow chart for our gynecologic cytology QI program was produced from the Pap-Test and HPV DNA assay results. This offer presents the added benefit of minimizing the problem of sample variation. The prevalence of HPV infection was 16.2% in this study.

Results of human papillomavirus DNA testing with the hybrid capture 2 assay are reproducible.

Reproducibility of the Hybrid Capture 2 Test (HC 2) for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection was evaluated by assaying frozen cervical specimens in 1997 and again in 2001 from 1,775 women with normal cervical cytology. Using a cutoff point of 1.0 pg of HPV DNA/ml between a negative and a positive test result, the result of the kappa test for agreement was 0.72 (a kappa value of >0.60 is considered good agreement). Using cutoff points of 1.0 and 10.0 pg/ml between negative and low positive and between low positive and high positive, respectively, the kappa was 0.68 and the linear-weighted kappa was 0.76. The results of this study indicate that HC 2 testing is reproducible even among cytologically normal women with low test values.