Caution in interpretation of disease causality for heterozygous loss-of-function variants in the MYH8 gene associated with autosomal dominant disorder.

To date, the NM_002472.2(MYH8):c.2021G>A (p.Arg674Gln) missense variant in the MYH8 gene is the only known genetic change in individuals with autosomal dominant trismus-pseudocamptodactyly syndrome with unknown molecular mechanism. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including targeted gene panels and whole-exome sequencing, is routinely performed in many clinical diagnostic laboratories as standard-of-care testing aimed at identifying disease-causing genomic variants. Whole-exome sequencing has revealed loss-of-function variants in the MYH8 gene. To properly classify the MYH8 loss-of-function variants, we either retrieved them from public databases or retrospectively collected them from individuals genetically tested by custom NGS panels or by whole-exome sequencing and confirmed using Sanger sequencing. We further evaluated the respective clinical presentations of these individuals with the MYH8 loss-of-function variants. Heterozygous loss-of-function variants in the MYH8 gene were detected in 16 individuals without trismus-pseudocamptodactyly syndrome. Four of these 16 individuals had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant detected in another gene that could explain their clinical presentation. Moreover, there are ∼100 MYH8 heterozygous protein-truncating and splice site variants in the ExAC database in different populations. Our results, combined with the population data, indicate that loss-of-function variants in the MYH8 gene do not cause autosomal dominant trismus-pseudocamptodactyly syndrome, and the clinical significance of these variants remains unknown at present. This result highlights the importance of considering the molecular mechanism of disease, variants published in the medical literature, and population genomic data for the correct interpretation of loss-of-function variants in genes associated with autosomal dominant diseases.

Regulating whole exome sequencing as a diagnostic test.

In the last decade, there has been a flood of new technology in the sequencing arena. The onset of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has resulted in the vast increase in genetic diagnostic testing available to the ordering physician. Whole exome sequencing (WES) has become available as a diagnostic test performed in certified clinical laboratories. This has led to increased presence in the diagnostic marketplace, increased consumer awareness, and the question has been raised by various stakeholders to whether there is sufficient stringent regulation of WES and other NGS-based tests. We discuss the various WES services currently available in the marketplace, current regulation of WES as a laboratory developed test, the proposed FDA involvement in its oversight as well as the response of various laboratory groups that provide these diagnostic services. Overall, a rigorous process oversight and assessment of inter-lab reproducibility is strongly warranted for WES as it is used as a diagnostic test, but regulation should be mindful of the excessive administrative burden on academic and smaller diagnostic laboratories.