Hepatitis C infection on immune recovery in HIV-positive patients on successful HAART: the role of genotype 3.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of HCV infection and of HCV genotypes on immune restoration in HIV-infected patients on a successful HAART regimen. METHODS: Patients from the MASTER Study were included in this current longitudinal study if they met the following criteria: being on any successful HAART, availability of CD4+ cell count and HIV RNA level before starting the suppressive HAART and 12 months after suppressive therapy, availability of HCV antibodies. The primary endpoints of the study were defined as achieving a difference above 100 cell/mmc between CD4+ at baseline and at time of HIV RNA suppression while on therapy (DeltaCD4+early), or 12 month after a suppressive therapy (DeltaCD4+late). RESULTS: 844 HIV-positive patients were included in the analysis: 673 were HCV-negative and 171 were HCV-positive [92 (53.8%) subjects had HCV genotype 1; 58 (33.9%), genotype 3; 21 (12.3%), genotype 4]. Plasma HIV RNA (both baseline as highest value), nadir CD4+, being naïve, time to reach undetectable plasma HIV RNA, treatment with PI vs NNRTI were associated with an early immunological recovery; the occurrence of previous AIDS event, a history of injection drug use, and HCV infection were associated with failure to achieve an early immunological recovery. Variables associated with DeltaCD4+late immune recovery were baseline CD4+ value, plasma HIV RNA (both baseline as highest value), being naïve and time to reach undetectable plasma HIV RNA. HCV infection per se was not associated with a worse probability to reach late immunologic response, although among HCV infected patients, having a genotype 3 was associated with a worse immune recovery. At multivariable analysis, factors that remained associated with failure to achieve an early immunological response were being HCV infected and history of injection drug use, while those associated with a failure to achieve a late immunological response were being infected with HCV genotype 3 and older age. CONCLUSIONS: A blunted early immune recovery was observed in HCV infected patients, compared with HCV negative subjects, while late immune recovery was not different among HCV infected as a whole and not infected subjects; only the subgroup of subjects infected with genotype 3 showed an impaired late immune recovery.

An immunological comparison of third companion in advanced drug-naive HIV-infected patients.

An immunological comparison of three different third companions (abacavir [ABC], efavirenz [EFV], ritonavir-boosted indinavir [IDVr]) on a backbone of either zidovudine plus didanosine (AZT/ddI) or zidovudine plus lamivudine (AZT/3TC) was performed in 76 HIV-infected, advanced-naive patients. Baseline median CD4 count and viremia were 217/microL and 238,301 copies/mL, respectively. Immunologic parameters were measured at baseline and after months of therapy. By the end of the study, 36 patients (mostly in the protease inhibitor [PI]-containing arms) had dropped out of the study; 22/36 cases of drop out were due to tolerability issues. All regimens resulted in increases in CD4 counts, with the most solid changes seen in patients using ABC as a third companion. Median HIV plasma viremia at month 12 was <50 copies/mL, and viremia was undetectable in 26/38 patients (68%). At the end of the study period, HIV antigen- and mitogen-stimulated proliferation overall was better in patients using either of the PI-boosted third companions. In these patients, the strongest down-modulation of activation marker-bearing cells was also observed. Finally, CD8+/28-/CD45RA+ lymphocytes (effector cells) were increased in all groups of patients with the exception of individuals receiving PI-boosted therapies. Results of this pilot study, although very preliminary, suggest that different combinations of antivirals result in a range of effects on immune cell functions. The clinical implications of these results need to be further analyzed in follow-up studies and in larger cohorts of patients.

Granule-dependent mechanisms of lysis are defective in CD8 T cells of HIV-infected, antiretroviral therapy-treated individuals.

BACKGROUND: HIV-specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses are defective in HIV-infected patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART). This defect has been attributed to the decreased antigenic burden secondary to ART-associated suppression of HIV-replication, and is responsible for the rebounds of viraemia that occur when patients interrupt therapy. CTL are stimulated by type 1 cytokines and can kill targets via granule-dependent (perforin and granzymes) and -independent (tumour necrosis factor-alpha, CD95) mechanisms. METHODS: Granule-dependent and granule-independent mechanisms of CTL killing, as well as type 1 cytokine production by CD4 T cells, were analysed in 57 chronically HIV-infected ART-treated or ART-untreated individuals. RESULTS: The results can be summarized as follows: the frequency of gp160 (env)-specific interferon-gamma-secreting CD8 T lymphocytes correlates positively with HIV viraemia in ART-treated and -untreated patients; Env-specific perforin- and granzymes-expressing CD8 T lymphocytes, and Env-stimulated perforin and granzymes mRNA, are reduced in ART-treated patients independently of HIV viral load and of type 1 cytokine production; tumour necrosis factor-alpha production is increased in ART-treated individuals; and Env-specific immature CD8+28+27+ cells are only marginally augmented in ART-treated patients, Similar results are observed in cytomegalovirus-specific CD8 T cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. CONCLUSIONS: A defect of CTL function that selectively affects the granule-dependent mechanisms of lysis is observed in ART-treated individuals. Because interferon-gamma production is higher in these patients, this could be a defect primarily involving CTL. These data suggest an independence of CD8 T-cell numbers and their lytic ability in HIV-infected, ART-receiving patients. Immunomodulants are needed to successfully treat HIV infection.

Strategies to decrease viral load rebound, and prevent loss of CD4 and onset of resistance during structured treatment interruptions.

BACKGROUND: Toxicity and other drug adherence-related factors have contributed to decreased compliance to antiretroviral regimens amongst HIV-infected patients. Irregular therapy disruption causes loss of CD4 T cells, onset of drug resistance and rapid rebound of plasma viral load (VL). However, an appropriate choice of drugs and properly scheduled structured treatment interruptions (STIs) may limit VL rebound, maintain CD4 counts and minimize resistance. METHODS: We conducted a clinical study of STIs, RIGHT 901, involving 60 drug-naive patients with chronic HIV infection (CD4 >300, VL >10,000) randomized to receive didanosine-stavudine-indinavir (IDV group) or didanosine-stavudine-hydroxyurea (HU group), for 12 weeks. Subsequently, all patients were randomized again to start STI (short induction) or to continue the therapy for an additional 24 weeks before starting STI (long induction). Both groups underwent four STI cycles and then stopped therapy as long as viraemia remained below 10,000 copies/ml before reinitiating another four cycles of STI. RESULTS: During continuous therapy VLs were suppressed at similar rates in both the HU and IDV groups, while a blunted CD4 count was documented in the HU group. Following the first stop median VL rebounded close to baseline values in both groups, however, during the following STI median VL rebound decreased in the HU group, while in the IDV group VL continued to rebound to values close to baseline, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Moreover, patients treated with HU had a constant and stable CD4 increase during STI, whereas CD4 counts fluctuated in the IDV group, with sharp falls during treatment interruptions and partial CD4 recovery following treatment restart. Even in the presence of IDV resistance predisposing mutations at baseline, no genotypic change in the protease sequence was observed during STI. A relevant mutation in the reverse transcriptase sequence (K70R) emerged in one patient interrupting treatment after 36 weeks of continuous therapy and in one patient after four STI cycles. Side effects (no major events) were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate choice of STI schedule and regimens containing drugs less prone to resistance and/or able to prevent CD4 fluctuation may contribute to optimizing STI for chronically infected patients with respect to limiting viral rebound, improving CD4 counts and maintaining a resistance profile comparable to continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Early and late effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a 2 year follow-up of antiviral-treated and antiviral-naive chronically HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Control of HIV replication can be observed in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-treated and, occasionally, in HAART-naive patients. The immunological correlates of these situations were examined in a longitudinal study. DESIGN: A prospective study. Immunovirological analyses in 16 chronically HIV-infected, HAART-naive patients (time 0) who started HAART. Fifteen patients (short-term HAART) were re-evaluated after 24 months (time 1). Results were compared with those of 30 patients who received HAART for more than 12 months before the study period (long-term HAART) and were analysed at the same timepoints. Fifteen patients who were antiviral therapy naive (naive) at both timepoints were also studied. RESULTS: Over a 24-month period CD4 and CD8 cell counts and viraemia remained unchanged in naive and long-term HAART patients; CD4 cell counts increased and viraemia diminished in short-term HAART individuals. Antigen-stimulated proliferation was unmodified in naive and short-term HAART patients, but improved in long-term HAART individuals. Gp160-stimulated IL-2 and IFN-gamma production was augmented in long-term HAART patients and marginally modified in other patients. IL-7 production was unmodified in naive individuals, augmented in short-term HAART patients, and diminished in long-term HAART patients. Chemokine production was similar in all patients. Naive patients showed the highest CD8 cell counts at both timepoints. CONCLUSION: HAART has a major impact on the outcome of HIV infection, even if functional immune modulation in HAART-treated patients is evident only after long periods of therapy. Low but detectable HIV replication in HAART-naive patients with preserved immune functions might not be associated with CD4 cell reduction, functional immune defects, or changes in viraemia.