Chemoenzymatic synthesis of glycosylated glucagon-like peptide 1: effect of glycosylation on proteolytic resistance and in vivo blood glucose-lowering activity.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36) amide (GLP-1) has been attracting considerable attention as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In this study, we applied a glycoengineering strategy to GLP-1 to improve its proteolytic stability and in vivo blood glucose-lowering activity. Glycosylated analogues with N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), N-acetyllactosamine (LacNAc), and alpha2,6-sialyl N-acetyllactosamine (sialyl LacNAc) were prepared by chemoenzymatic approaches. We assessed the receptor binding affinity and cAMP production activity in vitro, the proteolytic resistance against dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) 24.11, and the blood glucose-lowering activity in diabetic db/db mice. Addition of sialyl LacNAc to GLP-1 greatly improved stability against DPP-IV and NEP 24.11 as compared to the native type. Also, the sialyl LacNAc moiety extended the blood glucose-lowering activity in vivo. Kinetic analysis of the degradation reactions suggested that the sialic acid component played an important role in decreasing the affinity of peptide to DPP-IV. In addition, the stability of GLP-1 against both DPP-IV and NEP24.11 incrementally improved with an increase in the content of sialyl LacNAc in the peptide. The di- and triglycosylated analogues with sialyl LacNAc showed greatly prolonged blood glucose-lowering activity of up to 5 h after administration (100 nmol/kg), although native GLP-1 showed only a brief duration. This study is the first attempt to thoroughly examine the effect of glycosylation on proteolytic resistance by using synthetic glycopeptides having homogeneous glycoforms. This information should be useful for the design of glycosylated analogues of other bioactive peptides as desirable pharmaceuticals.

2-Arylimino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazines as a new class of cannabinoid receptor agonists. Part 1: discovery of CB2 receptor selective compounds.

2-Arylimino-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazines have been identified as a novel class of cannabinoid agonists. A lead structure with moderate activity was discovered through a high throughput screening assay. Structure-activity relationships led to the discovery of potent agonists of CB(2) receptor. The most potent compound 13 displays K(i) values of >5000 and 9 nM to CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, respectively.

Structure-activity relationships of a novel class of endothelin-A receptor antagonists and discovery of potent and selective receptor antagonist, 2-(benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-6-isopropyloxy-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-chromene-3-carboxylic acid (S-1255). 1. Study on structure-activity relationships and basic structure crucial for ET(A) antagonism.

A novel series of endothelin-A (ET(A)) selective receptor antagonists having a 2H-chromene skeleton are described. A lead compound, 2-(benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-2H-chromene-3-carboxylic acid (3), was found by modifications of our own angiotensin II antagonist. A structure-activity relationship (SAR) study of 3 reveals that the structural requirements essential for potent and selective ET(A) receptor binding affinity are the m,p-methylenedioxyphenyl, carboxyl, and isopropoxy groups at the 2-, 3-, and 6-positions, respectively, on the (R)-2H-chromene skeleton. The substituent at the 4-position is also important for improving the activity, and various hydrophobic functional groups of 6-9 A such as liner, branched, and cyclic aliphatic groups, unsubstituted and substituted aryl groups, and even halogen atoms were acceptable. These results suggest that (R)-2-(benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-6-isopropoxy-2H-chromene-3-carboxylic acid, formula 108, is the crucial basic structure to be recognized by the ET(A) receptor. The most potent compound is (R)-48 (S-1255), which binds to the ET(A) receptor with an IC(50) value of 0.19 nM and is 630-fold selective for the ET(A) receptor than for the ET(B) receptor. This compound has 55% oral bioavailability in rats. On the basis of the SAR, the roles of each substituent in the receptor binding are discussed.