Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Immunol Methods ; 506: 113280, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577101

RESUMO

Nanovaccine is a revolutionary type of immunizations for various diseases that is simple to manufacture and administer. As a result, we are working to develop innovative nanovaccines against E. coli, which is capable of causing disease both inside and outside of its predilection sites, causing respiratory and systemic disease (colibacillosis).Colibacillosis is a global disease that significantly affects poultry production. The present study aims to evaluate in vivo cell-mediated immunity against a chitosan-nanovaccine from E. coli serogroups O1 and O78 to aid in limiting colibacillosis in chicken. Two hundred specific pathogen-free (SPF) three weeks old broiler chickens were used and divided into five groups: the first group inoculated with the outer membrane and flagellar antigen (OF), the second group inoculated with chitosan capsulated-outer membrane protein-flagellar antigen (CSC-O-F), the third group inoculated with chitosan loaded-outer membrane protein-flagellar antigen (CSL-O-F), the fourth group was vaccinated with (CSL-O-F-M) adjuvanted with Montanide ISA 71 RVG, and the fifth group was left as unvaccinated control. The immune response was measured by ELISA, lymphocyte proliferation test, and challenge test. The duration of immunity was also studied. The CSL-O-F-M had the highest antibody titer in an ELISA test using the O1 strain, and the CSC-O-F had the highest antibody titer in an ELISA test using the O78 strain. For both O1 and O78 strains, the CSL-O-F-M had the strongest cell-mediated immune response, which was validated by the challenge test and duration study. We recommend producing nanovaccines (CSL-O-F-M) from E.coli O1 and O78 strains as a new manufacturing vaccine based on the demonstrated results. Because it produces highly effective humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, this novel vaccine may be useful in reducing the risk of colibacillosis.


Assuntos
Quitosana , Infecções por Escherichia coli , Doenças das Aves Domésticas , Animais , Galinhas , Escherichia coli , Infecções por Escherichia coli/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Escherichia coli/veterinária , Imunidade Celular , Proteínas de Membrana , Óleo Mineral , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/prevenção & controle
2.
Vet World ; 14(7): 1815-1821, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34475703

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Equine herpesvirus-1 infection in horses causes a wide range of manifestations affecting the respiratory tract. The virus can cause serious economic losses through sporadic abortion in pregnant mares, perinatal death, respiratory disease in young foals. This study was designed to prepare inactivated equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) vaccine using both 0.005 M binary ethylenimine (BEI) and 0.0006% formaldehyde (FA) to decrease the use of BEI and provide a good immunological response. The efficacy, safety, and duration of immunity of the prepared inactivated EHV-1 vaccine were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prepared FA/BEI-inactivated EHV-1 vaccine was adjuvanted with Alhydrogel and then evaluated by inoculation into guinea pigs, followed by comparison with the commercial inactivated EHV-1 vaccine. These two vaccines were evaluated by testing the safety and immunogenicity in horses classified into two groups. Group A was vaccinated with two doses of the prepared vaccine at a 4-week interval, while Group B was vaccinated with two doses of the commercial vaccine only. Anti-EHV-1 antibodies were detected in horse serum using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and virus neutralizing test (VNT). RESULTS: Regarding the time required to inactivate EHV-1 vaccine, this was decreased using 0.005 M BEI and 0.0006% FA from 24 to 8 h. ELISA in Group A horses demonstrated a significant increase in EHV-1 antibody titer at 2 weeks after the booster dose compared with that for the pre-booster one, from 485 to 855 antibody titer, which then peaked at 1240 in the 3rd month post-vaccination; after that, it began to decline gradually until the 6th month. Meanwhile, in Group B, the ELISA reading increased from 420 to 790 and then peaked at 1215. The VNT mean in Group A increased from 1.1 to 2.5 within 2 weeks after administration of the booster dose, while in Group B it increased from 0.8 to 2.1. Moreover, ELISA in Group A pigs indicated mean antibody titers at the 3rd week post-inoculation of 576 for Group A and 554 for Group B. CONCLUSION: The inactivated EHV-1 vaccine, with fewer chemicals, was prepared in a shorter time. It is safe and also more potent to protect horses for up to 6 months against EHV-1 infection than the commercially produced vaccine.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...