Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Am Surg ; 87(1): 128-130, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32856931

RESUMO

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder associated with characteristic skin findings, as well as a fourfold increase in risk of malignancy. NF1 patient malignancies commonly include the central and peripheral nervous system, but these patients are also at high risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. While most often these GI tumors are benign upper GI neurofibromas; clinicians should have a high suspicion for malignant tumors, degeneration into a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor or less common associated malignancies such as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (formerly carcinoid tumor), when patients present with multiple GI tumors. Our patient underwent a Whipple for symptomatic neurofibromas associated with NF1 and was unexpectedly discovered to have a metastatic duodenal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. The patient is a 66-year-old man with NF1 who presented with hematemesis and was found to have large gastric neurofibromas and an ampullary neurofibroma based on endoscopy and radiological imaging. Another ostensive neurofibroma was noted distally. A pancreatoduodenectomy was performed. Pathological examination identified the neurofibromas but the tumor measuring 1.4cm and arising from the minor duodenal papilla was, in fact, a synchronous well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor metastatic to regional lymph nodes, consistent with pT2 pN1, Stage IIIB cancer. NF1 patients with multiple GI tumors are at an increased risk for malignancy. Therefore, a high index of suspicion for malignancy in any patient with NF1 presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms has implications for a surgeon, warranting not only a further diagnostic investigation, but also an appropriate surgical intervention and sampling for nodal spread. Because of the possibility of a simultaneous cancer, it is crucial to assess all suspicious tumors even if the masses appear endoscopically benign.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Duodenais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico , Neurofibroma/diagnóstico , Neurofibromatose 1/complicações , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Idoso , Neoplasias Duodenais/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/cirurgia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Neurofibroma/cirurgia , Neurofibromatose 1/diagnóstico , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia
3.
Ann Plast Surg ; 80(5): 472-474, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29538000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ketorolac tromethamine (Toradol) is an effective a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and a powerful analgesic for patients undergoing breast surgery. However, the potential for postoperative bleeding has not yet been explored specifically in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. There is concern that an increased risk of bleeding exists in this population due to the lack of tissue apposition as a result of implant placement. We therefore seek to assess the associated risk of bleeding complication in implant-based breast reconstruction at our academic institution. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first case series addressing safety profile of Toradol specifically in patients undergoing nonautologous, implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS/RESULTS: A single-center, retrospective review was performed analyzing our institutional experience with Toradol in nonautologous, implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy. A prospective database of 522 patients collected between 2008 and 2013 was analyzed. Within the database, 57 patients who received intraoperative ketorolac were identified among a total of 180 patients undergoing prosthetic reconstruction. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of clinically relevant hematoma formation between the control and Toradol groups. The frequency of hematoma formation in the control was 0.09 (11/123 patients, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.15) and 0.04 in the Toradol group (2/57 patients, 95% confidence interval = 0.01-0.12), resulting in a P value of 0.32. Regarding the secondary outcomes, we did not detect a statistically significant difference in the total number of complications or length of hospital stay in the Toradol and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Review of our breast reconstruction database did not find a trend toward an elevated incidence of hematoma associated with intraoperative Toradol use in implant-based postmastectomy reconstruction.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Hematoma/induzido quimicamente , Cetorolaco/efeitos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hematoma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
J Clin Neurosci ; 21(5): 765-8, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24411330

RESUMO

Use of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is essential for managing patients with hydrocephalus or intracranial hypertension. While this procedure is safe and efficacious, ventriculostomy-associated infections (VAI) continue to cause significant morbidity. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of antibiotic-coated EVD (AC-EVD) in reducing the occurrence of VAI. Between July 2007 and July 2009, 203 patients underwent placement of an EVD. A total of 145 of these patients met the inclusion criteria, with 76 patients (52.4%) receiving AC-EVD and 69 patients (47.6%) receiving uncoated EVD. Ten patients (6.9%) developed VAI, of whom three were in the AC-EVD group and seven were in the uncoated EVD group (p=0.19). The mean duration between catheter insertion and positive cerebrospinal fluid culture was significantly greater in the AC-EVD group versus the uncoated EVD group (15±4days versus 4±2days, respectively; p=0.001). In the uncoated EVD group, 17 of 69 patients (24.6%) were dead at 3years versus 12 of 76 (15.8%) patients in the AC-EVD group (p=0.21). The overall VAI rate was 6.9% with a trend toward lower infection rates in the AC-EVD group compared to the uncoated EVD group (3.9% versus 10.1%, respectively; p>0.05).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Ventriculostomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Drenagem/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ventriculostomia/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA