An Exploratory Assessment of Sleep Patterns, Burnout and Perceived Stress of a Cohort of Active Duty Military Physicians.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction: Physician well-being is crucial and has the potential to impact patient safety. Many physicians across different stages of their careers experience stress, burnout, and/or decreased sleep. These factors can negatively affect physician well-being and performance and contribute to medical errors. The purpose of this study is to further understand physician well-being by examining a single cohort for patterns of sleep, burnout, and perceived stress across gender, training level, and specialty. Materials and methods: A cohort of 32 practicing military physicians ranging from first-year residents to experienced attendings continuously wore an actigraphy watch for a duration of at least 5 days to capture baseline sleep patterns. On the last day of data collection, participants completed a self-reported assessment of their daytime sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), a two-item burnout scale adapted from the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and a 10-item perceived stress questionnaire. Data for the entire cohort were descriptively analyzed. Results: The cohort had a mean sleep duration of 6.69 hours across the 5 days, with a maximum mean sleep duration of 7.90 hours, and a minimum mean sleep duration of 5.69 hours per day. Analysis stratified by gender and level of training revealed an average sleep duration of at least 6 hours across these groups. Overall, the cohort reported low perceived stress levels, low daytime sleepiness, and low burnout. Conclusion: The cohort of physicians examined in the present study did not show signs of significant sleep deprivation, feelings of perceived stress, or burnout. This may be due to military culture and the structure of military training facilities that emphasize duty hour regulations. In addition, these findings may be related to the fact that military health professionals are salaried, as opposed to being on a fee-for-service schedule, and military facilities offer well-being programs.

Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings.

Introduction: There is a need for educational resources supporting the practice and assessment of the complex processes of clinical reasoning in the inpatient setting along a continuum of physician experience levels. Methods: Using participatory design, we created a scenario-based simulation integrating diagnostic ambiguity, contextual factors, and rising patient acuity to increase complexity. Resources include an open-ended written exercise and think-aloud reflection protocol to elicit diagnostic and management reasoning and reflection on that reasoning. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the initial implementation evaluation results. Results: Twenty physicians from multiple training stages and specialties (interns, residents, attendings, family physicians, internists, surgeons) underwent the simulated scenario. Participants engaged in clinical reasoning processes consistent with the design, considering a total of 19 differential diagnoses. Ten participants provided the correct leading diagnosis, tension pneumothorax, with an additional eight providing pneumothorax and all participants offering relevant supporting evidence. There was also good evidence of management reasoning, with all participants either performing an intervention or calling for assistance and reflecting on management plans in the think-aloud. The scenario was a reasonable approximation of clinical practice, with a mean authenticity rating of 4.15 out of 5. Finally, the scenario presented adequate challenge, with interns and residents rating it as only slightly more challenging (means of 7.83 and 7.17, respectively) than attendings (mean of 6.63 out of 10). Discussion: Despite the challenges of scenario complexity, evaluation results indicate that this resource supports the observation and analysis of diagnostic and management reasoning of diverse specialties from interns through attendings.

Nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a blinded study to establish baseline acquisition rates.

OBJECTIVE: To define the extent of nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients admitted to a tertiary-care hospital. DESIGN: A blinded, prospective surveillance culture study of patients admitted to the hospital to determine the transmission (acquisition) rate of MRSA. Risk factors associated with the likelihood of MRSA colonization on admission were investigated. SETTING: Tertiary-care military medical facility. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted to the medicine, surgery, and pediatric wards, and to the medical, surgical, and pediatric intensive care units were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-five admission and 374 discharge samples were collected during the study period. One hundred forty-one patients were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 20 patients (3.7%) were colonized with MRSA on admission. Of the 354 susceptible patients, 6 acquired MRSA during the study for a transmission rate of 1.7%. Patients colonized with MRSA on admission were more likely to be older than non-colonized or MSSA-colonized patients, to have received antibiotics within the past year, to have been hospitalized within the prior 3 years, or to have a known history of MRSA. Patients acquiring MRSA had an average hospital stay of 17.7 days compared with 5.3 days for those who did not acquire MRSA. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the 6 MRSA isolates from patients who acquired MRSA revealed 4 distinct band patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients colonized with MRSA were identified on admission samples. Surveillance cultures of patients admitted may help to prevent MRSA transmission and infection.