Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients aged 80 years and older: institutional results and meta-analysis.

Patients aged ≥80 years are at high risk of adverse events after coronary artery bypass grafting. This study was performed to evaluate whether off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) is superior to conventional surgery (CCAB) in these high-risk patients. The outcome of 185 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent OPCAB or CCAB at our institution was reviewed and a meta-analysis on this issue was performed. Similar immediate postoperative results were observed after OPCAB and CCAB at our institution, despite significantly different operative risk (mean logistic EuroSCORE, OPCAB 20.3% vs CCAB 13.4%, P = 0.003). Among 56 propensity score matched pairs a trend toward lower postoperative stroke (0%, 95% CI 0-0 vs 3.6%, 95% CI 0-10.0, P = 0.50) was observed after OPCAB. No significant differences were observed in the other outcome end points. Five-year survival was 81.0% after OPCAB and 78.1% after CCAB (P = 0.239). Pooled analysis of eight studies including 3416 patients showed a significantly higher risk of postoperative stroke after CCAB (pooled rates: 4.2%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.4-7.1 vs 1.5%, 95% CI 0.9-2.5, risk ratio (RR) 2.15, 95% CI 1.17-3.96, P = 0.01). A trend toward higher immediate postoperative mortality was observed after CCAB (15 studies including 4409 patients, pooled rates: 6.5%, 95% CI 5.2-8.0 vs 5.6%, 95% CI 4.2-7.4, RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.86-1.93, P = 0.21). Generic inverse variance analysis showed similar intermediate survival after CCAB and OPCAB (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.85-2.01, P = 0.22). At 2 years, survival was 82.8% (95% CI 76.4-89.2) after CCAB and 88.3% (95% CI 82.9-93.7) after OPCAB. Current results indicate that OPCAB compared with CCAB in patients aged ≥80 years is associated with significantly lower postoperative stroke and with a trend toward better early survival. However, suboptimal quality of the available studies, particularly the lack of comparability of the study groups, prevents conclusive results on this controversial issue.

Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) has been recently developed to improve the performance of the original EuroSCORE. Herein we evaluated its discriminatory ability in predicting the immediate and late outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Complete data on 1,027 patients who underwent isolated CABG were available for validation of EuroSCORE II and to compare its discriminatory ability with the original EuroSCORE and its Finnish modified version. RESULTS: EuroSCORE II performed somewhat better (area under the curve [AUC] 0.852, Brier score 0.031) than the original logistic EuroSCORE (AUC 0.838, Brier score 0.034) and its Finnish modified version (AUC 0.825, Brier score 0.034) in predicting operative mortality. The overall expected-to-observed operative mortality ratio for the original logistic EuroSCORE was 1.8, for its Finnish modified version was 0.6, and for EuroSCORE II was 1.2. EuroSCORE II showed expected-to-observed ratios ranging from 1.05 to 1.17 in its highest third quintiles. The best cutoff of EuroSCORE II in predicting operative postoperative mortality was 10% (21.5% vs 1.6%, p<0.0001; sensitivity 91.5%, specificity 60.5%, negative predictive value 98.4%, accuracy of 90.3%). The EuroSCORE II was predictive of de novo dialysis (AUC 0.805), prolonged use of inotropes (AUC 0.748), and intensive care unit stay 5 days or greater (AUC 0.793). The risk of late mortality significantly increased across increasing quintiles of EuroSCORE II (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The EuroSCORE II performs better than its original version in predicting operative mortality and morbidity after isolated CABG. Its ability to predict 30-day mortality in high-risk patients is of particular importance. The EuroSCORE II is also a good predictor of late postoperative survival.

Individual surgeon's impact on the risk of re-exploration for excessive bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Excessive bleeding requiring re-exploration is a severe complication that may affect the outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. The authors hypothesized that surgeon performance may contribute significantly to such a complication. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral center in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand one patients. INTERVENTIONS: Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: Re-exploration for bleeding was performed in 113 patients (5.3%). Re-exploration was performed ≥3 days after surgery in 11 patients. The surgical site of bleeding was identified in 83 patients (73.5%). Rates of re-exploration for excessive bleeding ranged from 1.4% to 11.7% according to different surgeons (p < 0.0001). When adjusted for the additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, re-exploration for bleeding was associated with increased risks of low-cardiac-output syndrome (odds ratio [OR] 2.239, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.328-3.777), prolonged need for inotropes (OR 1.894, 95% CI 1.198-2.994), and an intensive care unit stay ≥5 days (OR 2.129, 95% CI 1.202-3.770). Logistic regression showed that an individual surgeon (p < 0.0001), preoperative body mass index <25 kg/m(2) (OR 2.733, 95% CI 2.145-3.481), and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (OR 3.891, 95% CI 1.669-9.076) were independent predictors of re-exploration for excessive bleeding. An individual surgeon also was an independent predictor of a postoperative blood loss ≥1,600 mL. CONCLUSIONS: An individual surgeon has a major impact on postoperative bleeding, and a meticulous surgical technique is expected to decrease significantly such a severe complication.

Use of blood products and risk of stroke after coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: The impact of blood transfusion on the development of post-operative stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is not well established. We, therefore, investigated this issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Complete data on peri-operative blood transfusion were available for 2,226 patients who underwent CABG in three Finnish hospitals. RESULTS: Stroke occurred post-operatively in 53 patients (2.4%). Logistic regression showed that pre-operative creatinine (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.000-1.006), extracardiac arteriopathy (OR 2.344, 95% CI 1.133-4.847), pre-operative atrial fibrillation (OR 2.409, 95% CI 1.149-5.052), and the number of packed red blood cell units transfused (OR 1.121, 95% CI 1.065-1.180) were significantly associated with post-operative stroke. When the various blood product transfusions instead of transfused units were included in the multivariable analysis, solvent/detergent treated plasma (Octaplas) transfusion (OR 2.149, 95% CI 1.141-4.047), but not red blood cell transfusion, was significantly associated with postoperative stroke. Use of blood products ranging from no transfusion (stroke rate 1.6%) to combined transfusion of red blood cells, platelets and Octaplas was associated with a significant increase in post-operative stroke incidence (6.6%, adjusted analysis: OR 1.727, 95% 1.350-2.209). Patients who received >2 units of red blood cells, >4 units of Octaplas units and >8 units of platelets had the highest stroke rate of 21%. CART analysis showed that increasing amount of transfused Octaplas, platelets and history of extracardiac arteriopathy were significantly associated with post-operative stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion of blood products after CABG has a strong, dose-dependent association with the risk of stroke. The use of Octaplas and platelet transfusions seem to have an even larger impact on the development of stroke than red blood cell transfusions.

Estimating the risk of complications related to re-exploration for bleeding after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery on the immediate postoperative outcome. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of data on re-exploration for bleeding after adult cardiac surgery were performed. RESULTS: The literature search yielded eight observational studies reporting on 557,923 patients and were included in the present analysis. Patients requiring re-exploration were significantly older, more frequently males, had a higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease and preoperative exposure to aspirin, and more frequently underwent urgent/emergency surgery. Re-exploration was associated with significantly increased risk ratio (RR) of immediate postoperative mortality (RR 3.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44-4.37), stroke, need of intra-aortic balloon pump, acute renal failure, sternal wound infection, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The pooled analysis of four studies (two being propensity score-matched pairs analysis) reporting adjusted risk for mortality led to an RR of 2.56 (95%CI 1.46-4.50). Studies published during the last decade tended to report a higher risk of re-exploration-related mortality (RR 4.30, 95%CI 3.09-5.97) than those published in the 1990s (RR 2.75, 95%CI 2.06-3.66). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery carries a significantly increased risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity.

Timing of preoperative aspirin discontinuation and outcome after elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Whether aspirin should be discontinued before coronary artery bypass grafting is controversial. The potential benefits and harms associated with late use of aspirin (no discontinuation or discontinuation <3 days before surgery) were investigated in this retrospective, multicenter study. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter study. SETTING: Two university hospitals and one central hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive series of 859 patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2008 through December 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Aspirin (100 mg/day) was used <3 days before surgery in 240 patients and was discontinued >3 days before surgery in 619 patients. RESULTS: In the overall series, similar in-hospital mortality, amount of postoperative blood loss, rate of re-exploration for excessive bleeding, and use of blood products were observed in the study groups. However, aspirin discontinuation >3 days before surgery tended to be associated with a higher postoperative stroke rate (1.9% v 0.4%, p = 0.13). Such a trend was observed after off-pump (1.9% v 0%, p = 0.58) and on-pump (2.0% v 0.6%, p = 0.46) surgery. Among 153 pairs matched by the propensity score, patients with aspirin discontinued >3 days before surgery had a significantly higher rate of postoperative stroke (5.9% v 0.7%, p = 0.02) and tended to have a higher risk of the composite adverse outcome endpoint (19.6% v 12.4%, p = 0.09). The postoperative release of troponin I was similar in the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Late or no discontinuation of low-dose aspirin before coronary artery bypass grafting may decrease the risk of postoperative stroke without increased postoperative bleeding and need for blood transfusion. These findings and the risk of cardiovascular events possibly occurring at the time of its discontinuation suggest that the use of aspirin until the day of elective coronary surgery may be beneficial.

Safety of coronary artery bypass surgery during therapeutic oral anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic (international normalized ratio, INR 2.0-3.5) oral anticoagulation (TOAC) is assumed to increase perioperative bleeding complications and a standard recommendation is to discontinue warfarin before coronary bypass grafting (CABG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To assess the safety of TOAC we retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients (n=270) with long-term warfarin therapy referred for CABG in two centers where TOAC strategy is employed. The main in-hospital outcomes of interest were death, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, new onset renal failure, resternotomy, and their composite. In the TOAC group of 103 patients CABG was performed during therapeutic oral anticoagulation and in the control group (81 patients) preoperative INR was lowered to a subtherapeutic (≤1.5) level. RESULTS: The patients in TOAC group were more often operated on an emergency basis (p=0.02) and their EuroSCORE was higher (p=0.02). There were no significant differences in the major outcome events or their composite (17.5 vs. 11.1%, p=0.30) between the groups. Patients in the TOAC group had more postoperative blood loss (941±615 vs. 754±610 ml, p<0.01) and received more fresh frozen plasma (2.8±3.0 vs. 1.3±2.4 units, p<0.001), but transfused red blood cells (2.1±2.8 vs. 2.1±3.4 units) were comparable in the groups. Preoperative clopidogrel (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.4-16.2, p=0.01) and enoxaparin therapy (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.5, p=0.04) were the only significant independent predictors for any major adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that CABG is a safe procedure during TOAC with no excess bleeding or major complications. Prospective trials are needed to confirm this observation.

Poor late survival after surgical treatment of pleural empyema.

BACKGROUND: We have evaluated the outcome of patients who underwent surgical treatment of parapneumonic pleural empyema. METHODS: This study included 143 consecutive patients older than 18 years who were operated on for parapneumonic pleural empyema. RESULTS: The overall survival at 30 days, 3 months, 5 years, and 10 years was 97.2, 92.3, 80.6, and 61.9%, respectively. Serum albumin (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65-0.94), cerebrovascular disease (OR = 30.49, 95% CI = 1.35-689.05), pulmonary embolism (OR = 984.63, 95% CI = 7.81-124206.8), and Thoracoscore (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.10-2.35) were independent predictors of 3-month overall survival. Age (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03-1.14), serum albumin (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82-0.98), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (RR = 5.14, 95% CI = 1.3319.84), and cerebrovascular disease (RR = 6.76, 95% CI = 1.33-34.34) were independent predictors of pneumonia/pleural empyema-related death. Twenty-two patients required 33 reinterventions after the primary procedure: 19 patients after primary thoracoscopy and 3 patients after primary thoracotomy. Reintervention did not have any significant impact on 30-day mortality (4.5% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.49), but it affected 3-month mortality (26.1% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.0001). Reoperation was an independent predictor of late overall survival (at 10 years: 35.5% vs. 67.4%, RR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.33-6.57) and freedom from pneumonia/pleural empyema-related death (at 10 years: 73.9% vs. 91.3%, RR = 4.40, 95% CI = 1.24-15.66). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of pleural empyema can be associated with good immediate results, but longer follow-up showed that pneumonia/pleural empyema-related mortality and all-cause mortality are rather poor.