Intra- and postoperative parathyroid hormone-kinetics do not advocate for autotransplantation of discolored parathyroid glands during thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Thyroidectomy continues to pose the risk of typical complications, including postoperative hypocalcemia and permanent hypoparathyroidism. The strategic decision on how to preserve parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion relies on assessing the viability of the parathyroid glands (PGs). The aim of this study was to assess parathyroid discoloration as an indicator for loss of parathyroid function. METHODS: The prospective study included 29 patients (24 women, 5 men; age 53.2 ± 13.0 years) who underwent near-total or total thyroidectomy. An intra- and postoperative PTH and calcium monitoring was performed. The intraoperative situs of the PGs was documented by a study protocol. The patients were grouped in three categories: group A, 12 patients with four visualized and normally colored PGs; group B, 13 patients with four visualized and three or four discolored PGs; group C, 4 patients who had undergone autotransplantation of two PGs. RESULTS: Compared to group A, groups B and C showed sharper intraoperative PTH declines. PTH values recovered more quickly in group B than in group C. However, no significant differences in PTH kinetics were found in the general linear model for repeated measures (p = 0.132). However, a significantly higher incidence of protracted hypocalcemia-related symptoms for more than 14 postoperative days was found for group C (50.0%) than for groups A (0%) and B (0%; p = 0.011). None of the patients developed permanent hypoparathyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: The function of discolored PGs is only transiently impaired and recovers within a short time after surgery. Our observations do not support autotransplantation as a generally applicable first-line intervention for discolored PGs in the absence of other criteria for autotransplantation.

CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Air insufflation during colonoscopy is considered the standard method in most endoscopic centers. Notably, several studies have reported reduced abdominal pain after colonoscopy with CO2 insufflation in unsedated and in lightly sedated patients. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of CO2 insufflation after colonoscopy in moderately and deeply sedated patients. We also evaluated whether CO2 insufflation increases patients' compliance for colorectal cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 300 consecutive patients allocated to colonoscopy were randomly assigned to either CO2 or air insufflation. Propofol was titrated to a level of deep sedation and propofol combined with midazolam was used for moderate sedation. Post-interventional pain levels and satisfaction with the procedure were registered on a 10-point visual analog scale. Compliance for colorectal cancer screening was ascertained separately. RESULTS: CO2 insufflation was used during colonoscopy in 157 patients; conventional air was used in 143 patients. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex and body mass index. Neither major nor minor complications were observed. Pain sensation was significantly lower in the CO2 group at 15 min, 30 min and 6 h after colonoscopy (P<0.01); at 12 h no difference was observed. In contrast, levels of patient satisfaction did not show any significant difference. Voluntary colorectal cancer screening appeared not to be influenced by the type of insufflation gas used. CONCLUSIONS: CO2 insufflation in deeply and moderately sedated patients during colonoscopy has no impact on patients' satisfaction with the procedure or on their attitude to voluntary colorectal cancer screening. However, the use of CO2 insufflation significantly diminishes abdominal pain after colonoscopy.