Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation.

OBJECTIVE: Two experiments are presented examining adaptive and adaptable methods for invoking automation. BACKGROUND: Empirical investigations of adaptive automation have focused on methods used to invoke automation or on automation-related performance implications. However, no research has addressed whether performance benefits associated with brain-based systems exceed those in which users have control over task allocations. METHOD: Participants performed monitoring and resource management tasks as well as a tracking task that shifted between automatic and manual modes. In the first experiment, participants worked with an adaptive system that used their electroencephalographic signals to switch the tracking task between automatic and manual modes. Participants were also divided between high- and low-reliability conditions for the system-monitoring task as well as high- and low-complacency potential. For the second experiment, participants operated an adaptable system that gave them manual control over task allocations. RESULTS: Results indicated increased situation awareness (SA) of gauge instrument settings for individuals high in complacency potential using the adaptive system. In addition, participants who had control over automation performed more poorly on the resource management task and reported higher levels of workload. A comparison between systems also revealed enhanced SA of gauge instrument settings and decreased workload in the adaptive condition. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that brain-based adaptive automation systems may enhance perceptual level SA while reducing mental workload relative to systems requiring user-initiated control. APPLICATION: Potential applications include automated systems for which operator monitoring performance and high-workload conditions are of concern.

An evaluation of an adaptive automation system using a cognitive vigilance task.

The performance of an adaptive automation system was evaluated using a cognitive vigilance task. Participants responded to the presence of a green "K" in an array of two, five, or nine distractor stimuli during a 40-min vigil. The array with the target stimulus was presented once each minute. Participants EEG was recorded and an engagement index (EI = 20 x beta/(alpha + theta)) was derived. In the negative feedback condition, increases in the EI caused the number of stimuli in the array to decrease while decreases in the EI caused the number of stimuli to increase. For the positive feedback condition, increases in the index caused an increase in the array size (AS) while decreases caused a decrease in the array size. Each experimental participant had a yoked control partner who received the same pattern of changes in array irrespective of their engagement index. A vigilance decrement was seen only for the positive feedback, experimental group.

Effects of a psychophysiological system for adaptive automation on performance, workload, and the event-related potential P300 component.

The present study examined the effects of an electroencephalographic- (EEG-) based system for adaptive automation on tracking performance and workload. In addition, event-related potentials (ERPs) to a secondary task were derived to determine whether they would provide an additional degree of workload specificity. Participants were run in an adaptive automation condition, in which the system switched between manual and automatic task modes based on the value of each individual's own EEG engagement index; a yoked control condition; or another control group, in which task mode switches followed a random pattern. Adaptive automation improved performance and resulted in lower levels of workload. Further, the P300 component of the ERP paralleled the sensitivity to task demands of the performance and subjective measures across conditions. These results indicate that it is possible to improve performance with a psychophysiological adaptive automation system and that ERPs may provide an alternative means for distinguishing among levels of cognitive task demand in such systems. Actual or potential applications of this research include improved methods for assessing operator workload and performance.

Effects of a biocybernetic system on vigilance performance.

The present study was designed to determine whether a biocybernetic, adaptive system could enhance vigilance performance. Participants were asked to monitor the repetitive presentation of white bars on a computer screen for occasional increases in length. An index of task engagement was derived from participants' electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and was used to change the presentation rate of events among 3 values (6, 20, and 60 events/min). Under a negative feedback contingency, event rates increased if the engagement index decreased and, conversely, decreased if the index increased. Under positive feedback, the opposite contingency existed. Each experimental participant had a yoked control partner who received the same pattern of changes in event rates irrespective of his or her EEG activity. The results showed that better vigilance performance was obtained under negative feedback and that the performance of the yoked participants was similar to that of their experimental partners. These findings suggest that it may be possible to improve monitoring performance on critical activities such as air traffic control and radar and sonar operation through a pattern of event rate changes that do not rely on an operator's overt behavior.