FS-LASIK for the treatment of moderate-to-high hyperopia.

PURPOSE: To report modern outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FS-LASIK) for the correction of moderate-to-high hyperopia (≥3.50 diopters [D] and ≤6.50 D), excluding low or very high hyperopia. SETTING: Vissum, Alicante, Spain. DESIGN: Monocentric retrospective case series study. METHODS: Visumax-500 kHz femtosecond laser and Amaris-750 excimer-laser were used. Eyes with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. 36-month data was collected when available. Primary outcome measure was short term efficacy and safety. Secondary outcome measure was long term stability. RESULTS: 6-month data of 92 eyes was collected (68 eyes at 36 months). Mean age was 34.6 ± 10.4 years. Mean treated sphere was 4.69 ± 0.87. Efficacy index was 0.91 and 0.90 at 6 months and 36 months respectively. Safety index was 1.00. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 72%, postoperative spherical equivalent within 0.5 D in 80% (93% within 1 D), and loss of 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) occurred in 13% (2 or more lines in 0%). Gain of 1 or more CDVA lines occurred in 17%. A slight but significant regression was observed at 36 months. Postoperatively, 21.73% required flap lift for laser enhancement, and 11.95% an orthoptic visual rehabilitation due to accommodative disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Modern LASIK provides good efficacy and safety levels for the management of moderate to high hyperopia (up to +6.5 D), with levels close to those previously reported with refractive lens exchange for young hyperopia patients without presbyopia, where we defend the maintenance of LASIK as first line therapy. Risk of requiring a refractive enhancement or an orthoptic visual rehabilitation remains relevant and needs to be discussed with patients preoperatively.

Clinical Retinal Image Quality of a Non-diffractive Wavefront-Shaping Extended Depth of Focus (Vivity) Intraocular Lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical retinal optical image quality following implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) (Vivity; Alcon Laboratories, Inc), and to compare it with a monofocal and a trifocal IOL. METHODS: This prospective, comparative, case-control study included 88 eyes implanted with: (1) 19 monofocal IOLs (AcrySof SA60AT; Alcon Laboratories, Inc); (2) 38 EDOF IOLs (AcrySof IQ Vivity); and (3) 31 trifocal IOLs (AT LISA tri 839MP; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). Total root mean square, ocular lower (LOA) and higher (HOA) order aberrations, point spread function (PSF) Strehl ratio (PSF with LOA), and PSF Strehl ratio excluding LOA (PSF without LOA) were analyzed using a Pyramidal WaveFront-based sensor aberrometer Osiris (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici) at two different pupil sizes (3 and 4 mm). RESULTS: The trifocal IOL showed the highest PSF without LOA at both pupil sizes (0.52 ± 0.12 and 0.31 ± 0.07, respectively), followed by the AcrySof SA60AT (0.39 ± 0.10 and 0.27 ± 0.07) and AcrySof IQ Vivity (0.34 ± 0.11 and 0.24 ± 0.09) (P < .001). The AcrySof IQ Vivity and monofocal IOLs were comparable (P > .05). Despite the comparable postoperative low spherical equivalent among the IOL groups, the AT LISA tri 839MP retinal image quality (PSF with LOA) was the most severely affected by such residual refractive errors (dropped to 0.26 ± 0.06 at 3 mm; P < .001) compared to the monofocal AcrySof SA60AT (0.24 ± 0.07 at 3 mm) and EDOF Acrysof IQ Vivity (0.23 ± 0.06 at 3 mm) groups. The PSF with LOA was comparable (P > .05) among the three groups at both the 3-and 4-mm pupil size. CONCLUSIONS: Although trifocal IOLs provided significantly better retinal image quality if influence of LOA is excluded, they also demonstrated to be the most sensitive to residual refractive errors. Both the EDOF Acrysof IQ Vivity and mono-focal AcrySof SA60AT IOLs showed a comparable retinal image quality, and they are also comparable with trifocal IOLs when considering the clinically real PSF (PSF with LOA). [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(2):103-110.].