Gastroesophageal reflux disease and dental erosion: The role of bile acids.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the bile acids in the saliva of patients with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and evaluate their effect on tooth surface. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study involved 26 GERD patients and 40 controls without GERD. Dental erosions were identified, saliva was collected and analyzed with chromatography for bile acid identification. An in vitro study assessed the effect of enamel exposition to taurocholic acid in concentrations of 1 µM, 10 µM, and a mixture of taurocholic acid and glycocholic acid at 10 µM on enamel microhardness, calcium release, and surface topography. RESULTS: Salivary bile acids were analyzed from 22 GERD patients and 40 controls. All these participants presented taurocholic acid and glycocholic acid in the saliva. The salivary amount of taurocholic acid was greater than glycocholic acid in both GERD patients (area under the curve: 7946 vs. 1361; p < 0.001) and controls (10,815 vs. 1290; p < 0.001). The salivary amount of taurocholic acid was greater in controls than in GERD patients (10,815 vs. 7946; p < 0.001). Dental erosion was more prevalent in GERD patients than in controls (27% vs. 7%; p = 0.041). In the GERD presence, the amount of glycocholic acid was greater in patients with dental erosion (1777 vs. 1239; p = 0.041). Enamel exposed to taurocholic acid at 10 µM, combined or not with glycocholic acid, had their microhardness increased, accompanied by calcium release, with no changes in surface topography. CONCLUSIONS: Taurocholic acid was the predominant salivary bile acid, particularly in controls without GERD. This bile acid had no deleterious effect on the enamel structure.

Predictors of dental erosions in patients evaluated with upper digestive endoscopy: a cross-sectional study.

The most studied medical condition related with dental erosions is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to assess other predictors of dental erosions besides GERD in outpatients referred for upper digestive endoscopy. In a cross-sectional study, we prospectively evaluated 235 patients who underwent upper digestive endoscopy. Patients were interviewed and examined by a trained dentist before the endoscopies, addressing dental health as well as clinical information and food intake. Dental erosion was classified using Basic Erosive Wear Examination score. Potential predictors for dental erosions were: gender, age, chronic use of antidepressants and proton pump inhibitors (PPI), diabetes mellitus, body mass index, heartburn and acid regurgitation scores, chocolate intake, reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia. Overall prevalence of dental erosions was 23.4%. The most parsimonious Poisson regression model for dental erosions considered age, chocolate intake and acid regurgitation as predictors. Dental erosions were associated with acid regurgitation in patients younger than 50 years [adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.8 (95% CI 1.1-2.9)] and with chocolate intake in patients older than 50 years [PR = 2.1 (95% CI 1.2-3.9]. The surfaces most eroded were palatine/lingual (n = 25) and occlusal (n = 25), followed by vestibular (n = 5). In outpatients evaluated with upper digestive endoscopy, the variables associated with dental erosions were age younger than 50 years, acid regurgitation and chocolate intake. Referral for dental evaluation should be considered for young patients with GERD and frequent acid regurgitation.

Are Lactobacillus salivarius G60 and inulin more efficacious to treat patients with oral halitosis and tongue coating than the probiotic alone and placebo? A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of probiotics and prebiotics might be useful to treat oral halitosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Lactobacillus salivarius G60 (LS) and inulin on oral halitosis and tongue coating. METHODS: In this double-masked, randomized, phase II clinical trial, 45 patients (aged 35 ± 15 years, 66% female) with oral halitosis and tongue coating were allocated to three treatment groups (n = 15) using gums of oral dissolution (one gum every 12 hours) for 10 days. Each gum contained LS (1 billion colony forming units [CFUs]) + inulin (1 g), LS (1 billion CFU) or placebo. Primary outcomes were organoleptic test, Halimeter, and tongue coating, whereas secondary outcomes were quality of life (QOL) and treatment safety. Generalized linear models were used, adjusting for age and sex. In vitro tests were performed to verify whether LS interacts with inulin and whether LS inhibits the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (97%) completed the study. Patients treated with LS + inulin showed greater reduction in halitosis measured by Halimeter compared with placebo (adjusted post-intervention average: 96.7 versus 142.5 ppb; P = 0.003), whereas LS and placebo did not differ (115.7 versus 142.5 ppb; P = 0.097). Organoleptic measurements and coating index showed a similar decrease for all groups. QOL improved in patients treated with LS + inulin compared with placebo (P = 0.029). Side effects were mild and transient in all groups. LS did not metabolize inulin but inhibited the growth of P. gingivalis and P. intermedia after 72 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with L. salivarius G60 combined or not with inulin showed significant decrease in the outcomes organoleptic test, Halimeter, and coating index, improving oral halitosis. However, no significant difference was obtained between the groups.