"Early results after initiation of a rib fixation programme: A propensity score matched analysis".

INTRODUCTION: Chest wall injuries are very common in blunt trauma and development of treatment protocols can significantly improve outcomes. Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) is an adjunct for the most severe chest injuries and can be used as a part of a comprehensive approach to chest injuries care. We hypothesized that implementation of a SSRF programme program would result in improved short-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The characteristics of the initial group of SSRF patients (Early-SSRF) were used to identify matching factors. Patients prior to SSRF protocol underwent a propensity score match, followed by screening for operative indications and contraindications. After exclusions, a non-operative (Non-Op) cohort was defined (n=36) resulting in an approximately 1:1 match. An overall operative cohort, inclusive of Early-SSRF and all subsequent operative patients, was defined (All- SSRF). A before-and-after analysis using chi-squared, Students T-tests, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to assess significance at the level of 0.05. RESULTS: Early-SSRF (n=22) and All-SSRF (n=45) were compared to Non-Op (n=36). The selection process resulted in well matched groups, and equally well-balanced operative indications between the groups. The Early-SSRF group demonstrated shortened duration of mechanical ventilation and a decreased frequency of being discharged a long-term acute care hospital. The All-SSRF group again demonstrated markedly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation compared to Non-Op (median 6 days vs 16 days, p < 0.01), more decrease discharge to a long-term acute care hospital (9% vs. 36%, p=0.01), and reduced risk for tracheostomy (8.9% vs. 33.3% respectively, p<0.01) CONCLUSION: The introduction of an operative rib fixation to a comprehensive chest wall injury protocol can produce improvements in clinical outcomes that decrease time on the ventilator and tracheostomy rates, and result in more patients being discharged to home. Creation and implementation of a chest wall injury protocol to include SSRF requires a multidisciplinary approach and thoughtful patient selection.

Does chest wall Organ Injury Scale (OIS) or Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) predict outcomes? An analysis of 16,000 consecutive rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Chest wall injuries have serious clinical consequences. It is presumed a higher severity of injury correlates with worse outcomes. The 2 most common chest wall injury severity scores, the Organ Injury Scale and the Abbreviated Injury Scale, are based on expert opinion with unknown clinical endpoints. Our aim was to determine if either the Organ Injury Scale or the Abbreviated Injury Scale are associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: A single institution, 4-year retrospective study of all patients with rib or sternal fractures was conducted. All patients were assessed for both Organ Injury Scale and Abbreviated Injury Scale scores. Outcomes assessed included mortality, complications, tracheostomy, and readmissions. Receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve were calculated to measure discriminatory accuracy of scoring systems for outcomes in chest wall injury. RESULTS: Overall, 3,033 patients presented with a total of 16,055 rib fractures. The median chest wall scores were 2 for Organ Injury Scale and 3 for Abbreviated Injury Scale. Abbreviated Injury Scale scores for the same patients were greater than the Organ Injury Scale in 48.7%, equivalent in 46.7%, and lower in 4.6%. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for in-hospital outcomes were weakly predictive for the Organ Injury Scale over the Abbreviated Injury Scale. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for readmissions were very weakly predictive for the Abbreviated Injury Scale over the Organ Injury Scale. CONCLUSION: There is a very weak association between chest wall Organ Injury Scale score and in-hospital outcomes. The Abbreviated Injury Scale score outperformed the Organ Injury Scale, only being weakly predictive of readmission. Chest wall injury scoring systems may need revision for future outcomes-based research and practice improvements.

Readmission rates and associated factors following rib cage injury.

BACKGROUND: There remains a lack of knowledge about readmission characteristics after sustaining rib fractures. We aimed to determine rates, characteristics, and predictive/protective factors associated with unexpected reevaluation and readmission after rib cage injury. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed based on trauma patients evaluated at an urban Level I trauma center from January 2014 to December 2016. Adult patients sustaining blunt trauma with more than one rib fracture or a sternomanubrial fracture were defined as having moderate to severe rib cage injury. Exclusion criteria included penetrating injury, death during initial hospitalization, and only one rib fracture. Reevaluation was defined as presenting at a hospital within 90 days of discharge urgently or emergently. Demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidities, complications, imaging, and readmission data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed with a significance of p less than 0.05. RESULTS: During the study period, 11,667 patients underwent trauma evaluation, of which 1,717 patients were found to have a moderate to severe rib cage injury. Within 90 days, 397 (23.1%) of patients underwent reevaluation, while 177 (10.3%) required readmission. One hundred forty-two (8.3%) patients were reevaluated specifically for chest-related complaints, and 55 (3.2%) required readmission. On univariate analysis, Injury Severity Score greater than 15, hospital length of stay longer than 7 days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay longer than 3 days, a worsened chest x-ray at discharge, a psychiatric comorbidity, a smoking comorbidity, deep vein thrombosis, unplanned readmission to the ICU, and unplanned intubation were higher in the overall reevaluation cohort. On multivariate analysis, age of 15 years to 35 years, Risk Assessment Profile score greater than 8, hypertension, psychiatric comorbidity, current smoker, and unplanned return to the ICU on index admission were predictive of reevaluation of overall reevaluation. CONCLUSION: Moderate to severe rib cage injury is associated with high rates of reevaluation and readmission. Younger patients who smoke and required a return to the ICU are at greater risk for readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Prognostic and Epidemiologic.

The sphenoid sinus natural ostium is consistently medial to the superior turbinate.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the location of the natural ostium of the sphenoid sinus relative to the intact superior turbinate. METHODS: Forty-seven cadaveric specimens were examined. Mucosa over the sphenoethmoidal recess, superior turbinate, and posterior ethmoid was left intact. The position of the sphenoid sinus natural ostium relative to the superior turbinate was identified. RESULTS: The sphenoid ostium was identified in all specimens. In all specimens, the sphenoid ostium was found to be medial to the intact superior turbinate, notwithstanding lateral deflection of the posterior few millimeters of the superior turbinate in some cases. CONCLUSION: The superior turbinate is an excellent landmark for the sphenoid sinus natural ostium. Previous observations of the ostium positioned lateral to the superior turbinate may have been caused by stripping of the superior turbinate mucosa before measurements were taken. In the intact specimen, the sphenoid ostium is reliably found medial to the superior turbinate.