IL-4 and IL-10 are both required for the induction of oral tolerance.

Protection from the development of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) can be induced by feeding mice interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein before uveitogenic challenge with the same protein. Two different regimens are equally effective in inducing protective tolerance, although they seem to do so through different mechanisms: one involving regulatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-beta), and the other with minimal involvement of cytokines. Here we studied the importance of IL-4 and IL-10 for the development of oral tolerance using mice genetically engineered to lack either one or both of these cytokines. In these animals we were able to protect against EAU only through the regimen inducing cytokine-independent tolerance. When these animals were fed a regimen that in the wild-type animal is thought to predominantly induce regulatory cells and is associated with cytokine secretion, they were not protected from EAU. Interestingly, both regimens were associated with reduced IL-2 production and proliferation in response to interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein. These findings indicate that both IL-4 and IL-10 are required for induction of protective oral tolerance dependent on regulatory cytokines, and that one cytokine cannot substitute for the other in this process. These data also underscore the fact that oral tolerance, manifested as suppression of proliferation and IL-2 production, is not synonymous with protection from disease.

Cytokine-dependent modulation of oral tolerance in a murine model of autoimmune uveitis.

In summary, our data suggest that oral tolerance in the mouse EAU model may occur by anergy/deletion or by suppression, depending on the feeding regimen. Tolerance involving putative regulatory cells appears to require the ability to produce both IL-4 and IL-10, whereas induction of tolerance involving anergy may not require the presence of Il-4 and IL-10. We propose that regulatory cells induced by three feedings of IRBP can be selectively enhanced through the use of cytokines. From the point of view of clinical therapy, it would be worthwhile to explore postimmunization feeding regimens involving administration of IL-4 and IL-10.

Interleukin-2 treatment potentiates induction of oral tolerance in a murine model of autoimmunity.

The present study addresses the feasibility of potentiating oral tolerance by immunomanipulation, using the murine model of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) induced by immunization with the retinal antigen interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP). Three feedings of 0.2 mg IRBP every other day before immunization did not protect against EAU, whereas a similar regimen of five doses was protective. However, supplementing the nonprotective 3x regimen with as little as one injection of 1,000 U of human recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) resulted in disease suppression that was equal to that of the protective 5x regimen. The protective effect was maintained across a range of IL-2 doses and times of administration; none of the IL-2 regimens tested resulted in disease enhancement. Peyer's Patch cells of 3x-fed and IL-2-treated mice showed greatly increased production of TGF-beta, IL-4, and IL-10 compared with animals given the nonprotective 3x regimen and to animals given the protective 5x regimen. We propose that IL-2 treatment enhances protection from EAU at least in part by stimulating production of antiinflammatory cytokines by regulatory cells in Payer's Patches. Moreover, the observed lymphokine production patterns suggest that whereas protection induced by the 3x + IL-2 regimen is likely to involve antiinflammatory cytokines, protection induced by the 5x regimen might involve anergy or deletion of the uveitogenic T cells. These results could have practical implications for use of IL-2 as a safe and effective way of potentiating oral tolerance.