Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Am J Vet Res ; 80(4): 410-415, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30919670

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of orally administered melatonin on the intraocular pressure (IOP) of ophthalmologically normal dogs. ANIMALS: 20 ophthalmologically normal dogs (40 eyes). PROCEDURES: In a randomized crossover study, each dog received a 7-day regimen of melatonin (0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg, PO, q 12 h) and a placebo (150 mg of lactose powder in a capsule, PO, q 12 h), with a 7-day washout period between treatment regimens. Rebound tonometry was used to measure the IOP in both eyes of each dog 5 times at 2-hour intervals on days 0 (before administration of the first dose), 2, 4, and 7 (after administration of the last dose) of each treatment period. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of treatment, day, and IOP measurement time within day on IOP. RESULTS: Intraocular pressure was not significantly associated with treatment but was associated with day and the interaction between day and IOP measurement time within day. The mean ± SD IOP was 14.26 ± 2.95 and 14.34 ± 2.69 mm Hg for the melatonin and placebo regimens, respectively. Within each treatment period, the mean IOP tended to decrease from day 0 to 7 as well as within each day, which was attributed to the dogs becoming acclimated to the study protocol and natural diurnal variations in IOP. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that oral administration of melatonin (0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg, q 12 h for 7 d) did not significantly affect the IOP of ophthalmologically normal dogs.


Assuntos
Cães , Pressão Intraocular/efeitos dos fármacos , Melatonina/farmacologia , Administração Oral , Animais , Ritmo Circadiano , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Masculino , Melatonina/administração & dosagem , Distribuição Aleatória , Tonometria Ocular
3.
J Wildl Dis ; 47(2): 415-26, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21441195

RESUMO

Beginning in early 2006, an ocular disease of unknown etiology was routinely observed in American crocodiles (Crocodylus acutus) inhabiting the highly polluted Tarcoles River in west-central Costa Rica. We examined the nature and incidence of ocular disease in Tarcoles crocodiles and assessed the possible association between the disease and accumulation of chemical pollutants in diseased individuals. During 12-15 September and 12-13 December 2007, crocodiles were captured and examined for ocular disease and sampled to determine environmental contaminant accumulation. Three of 11 (27.3%) crocodiles captured (all males) exhibited unilateral ocular disease, primarily characterized by corneal opacity and scarring, anterior synechia, and phthisis bulbi. Multiple pollutants were detected in crocodile caudal scutes (organochlorine pesticides [OCPs] and metals), crocodile blood (OCPs), and sediments (OCPs and metals) from the Tarcoles, but no associations were found between contaminant accumulation and the incidence of eye disease. On the basis of the limited number of diseased animals examined and the potential exposure of crocodiles to pathogens and other pollutants not targeted in this study, we cannot rule out infection or chemical toxicosis as causes of the eye lesions. However, circumstantial evidence suggests that the observed ocular disease is likely the result of injury-induced trauma (and possibly secondary infection) inflicted during aggressive encounters (e.g., territorial combat) among large adult crocodiles living at relatively high densities.


Assuntos
Jacarés e Crocodilos , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Oftalmopatias/veterinária , Poluição da Água/efeitos adversos , Animais , Costa Rica , Poluição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Oftalmopatias/epidemiologia , Oftalmopatias/etiologia , Masculino , Metais Pesados/análise , Praguicidas/análise
4.
Vet Ophthalmol ; 7(5): 327-34, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15310292

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of intraoperative contamination of the anterior chamber with viable microorganisms during cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, and to evaluate the relationship of contaminant microorganisms to patients' extraocular and nasal cavity floras. Also, the impact of various aspects of the patient history and phacoemulsification procedure on the incidence of positive postoperative anterior chamber cultures was investigated. Twenty-two eyes from 13 dogs presented for elective cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were studied. Preoperatively, microbiologic samples of the conjunctiva, eyelid margins, nares, and rostral nasal cavity were collected. Postoperatively, anterior chamber fluid was aspirated. Samples were submitted for aerobic/anaerobic bacteriologic culture and antimicrobial susceptibility, Mycoplasma culture, and fungal culture. Anterior chamber aspirates collected at the conclusion of surgery were culture positive for at least one organism in 22.7% of eyes. Three aerobic bacteria and three fungi were isolated from the anterior chamber aspirates. Two fungi and one bacterium isolated from the anterior chamber were typed identically, and the bacterium had a similar antibiogram to organisms recovered from the patient's conjunctiva and eyelid margin. No statistically significant difference in contamination frequency was found for the investigated patient and surgical variables. We conclude that intraoperative contamination of the anterior chamber with viable bacterial and fungal organisms is a common occurrence in canine patients undergoing cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, and the external ocular flora is a likely source of some of these contaminating microorganisms. This contamination is independent of the patient and surgical variables investigated.


Assuntos
Câmara Anterior/microbiologia , Extração de Catarata/veterinária , Doenças do Cão/cirurgia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/veterinária , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/veterinária , Complicações Intraoperatórias/veterinária , Implante de Lente Intraocular/veterinária , Animais , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Catarata/veterinária , Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Túnica Conjuntiva/microbiologia , Doenças do Cão/microbiologia , Cães , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/etiologia , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/etiologia , Feminino , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Implante de Lente Intraocular/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Fungos Mitospóricos/isolamento & purificação , Mycoplasma/isolamento & purificação
5.
Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract ; 5(2): 223-41, v, 2002 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12170630

RESUMO

This article highlights factors that must be kept in mind when dealing with species other than cats, dogs, and horses. Diseases of the eye are similar regardless of whether they occur in humans or domestic or exotic species. There are unique conditions in exotic species that reflect differences in anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, and pathophysiology compared with domestic species.


Assuntos
Oftalmopatias/veterinária , Animais , Animais Selvagens , Oftalmopatias/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatias/terapia , Oftalmologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...