Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 31(5): 510-3, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21061790

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a node count which can define an adequate inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) in primary VSCC. METHODS: A retrospective and prospective review of patients with node negative VSCC who had a full staging IFL. Detection of isolated groin recurrences (IGR) would allow groins with higher risk of groin recurrence to be identified. RESULTS: The median node count of 228 IFLs in 139 patients was eight (0-24). There were six IGR (4.3%). Increased rate of IGR was present in patients with increased age, tumour diameter and depth of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, unilateral IFL, and moderate/poor tumour grade. In the 138 groins with node counts of eight or greater there were no IGRs compared to six in the patients with either undissected groins or groin node counts less than eight (p = 0.030) Interval to IGR was significantly shorter than other sites of recurrence. Both disease-specific and overall survival were significantly reduced in IGR. CONCLUSIONS: An inadequate IFL is a nodal count of less than eight per groin; both these groins and undissected groins are at increased risk of IGR and should have close surveillance.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de Células Escamosas/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Virilha , Humanos , Canal Inguinal , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Metástase Linfática/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida
2.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 20(6): 395-400, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18606356

RESUMO

Cancer of the cervix is the second most common female cancer, with more than half a million cases worldwide occurring annually. Although screening programmes have significantly reduced the incidence and death rates in the western world, social pressures have led to the delay in childbearing, increasing numbers of cervix cancer present early in reproductive life and at an early stage. These women are often anxious to retain their fertility potential, if at all possible. Standard treatment is either radical hysterectomy or radiotherapy to the pelvis, both of which will inevitably compromise fertility, rendering future childbearing impossible. This has led to a questioning of the rationale for extensive surgery in all cases of early stage cervical cancer. The experience of reducing the radicality of surgery while not compromising its efficacy has been learnt from the current management of breast cancer. Such that this may be applied to cervical cancer. Accurate staging and measurement using magnetic resonance imaging can indicate the site and location of the tumour, allowing a radical wide local excision of early stage tumours to be carried out. This allows conservation of the corpus uteri with a potential for fertility preservation. An isthmic vaginal anastomosis maintains continuity of the vaginal canal after insertion of an isthmic cerclage. Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy completes the procedure. This technique combines aspects of the traditional radical vaginal hysterectomy plus the use of minimal access surgery to carry out the pelvic node dissection. A more invasive abdominal approach has also been described. Over 900 cases have been carried out and published, with 790 carried out vaginally (radical vaginal trachelectomy) and 116 abdominally. There have been over 300 pregnancies with 195 live births. Premature rupture of the membranes is a risk, with 10% of babies being significantly premature. Delivery is by classical caesarean section. Fertility rates are good with a low recurrence rate of 4%. Overall, radical vaginal trachelectomy seems to be a safe procedure in well-selected cases when carried out in centres with appropriate experience of radical vaginal surgery, and laparoscopic techniques. Obstetric management in high-risk feto-maternal units is necessary in view of the high risk of prematurity. This new approach preserves fertility in previously impossible situations and questions traditional management and teaching.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Infertilidade/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Humanos , Infertilidade/etiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/cirurgia , Resultado da Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/fisiopatologia , Vagina/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA