Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study.

The reliability and applicability of colposcopically directed cervical punch biopsy was assessed in a sample of 170 paired punch and large loop excision of cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) specimens obtained from previously untreated women who had been selected for treatment on the basis of cytology and/or colposcopic findings and in whom the entire cervical transformation zone was visible. A single punch biopsy was taken immediately before the LLETZ, and all the specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist. Nine (5.3%) punch biopsies were inadequate. In terms of whether or not there was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), the chance-corrected kappa analysis rated overall agreement as poor (kappa = 0.21, 95% confidence limits 0.02-0.39), whereas in terms of histologic grade, it was fair to moderate (kappa = 0.32, 95% confidence limits 0.23-0.42). Punch biopsy tended to underestimate the disease. The sensitivity and specificity of colposcopically directed punch biopsy for the detection of high-grade CIN was 74% and 91%, respectively, with positive- and negative predictive values of 97% and 48%, respectively. Two microinvasive and two intraepithelial glandular lesions were missed on punch biopsy. Punch biopsy should be avoided when high-grade disease is suspected.

The difference a day makes.

A patient attended a clinic requesting Depo Provera after emergency contraception. She gave a history of normal menstruation, but a pregnancy test proved positive. Subsequently an ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed.

How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse biopsies of large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix; to identify factors associated with negative histology; and to develop predictive models in order to reduce the number of negative loop excisions. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patient notes and audit database. SETTING: Colposcopy clinic of a large district general hospital in North Staffordshire. POPULATION: Four hundred and fifty-two women who underwent a large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) procedure for suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: Women who underwent a LLETZ procedure were placed in two different groups, one positive for cervical intra epithelial neoplasia and the other negative for cervical intra epithelial neoplasia. Information was obtained on a number of clinical and colposcopic variables. Analysis was undertaken to determine if there were any differences between the two groups. These factors were then identified and three predictive models generated. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were used to assess and test these models. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: To identify factors associated with negative histology on a LLETZ specimen. To predict how to reduce the number of negative LLETZ specimens. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-two women underwent a LLETZ procedure, 88 were negative (19%) and 364 were positive (81%). In women who were treated at their first visit, 56/316 (18%) had negative histology. There were significant associations between negative histology in the LLETZ and negative or low grade cytological atypia, negative colposcopic findings and years of age > 50 in both bivariate analysis and stepwise logistic regression. In the predictive models, the sensitivity ranged between 72% and 80%, the specificity 59%-72%, and the area under the receiver-operator characteristic was 0.75-0.77. If we had used the predictor models and managed women with negative or low grade cervical atypia and negative colposcopy findings conservatively, we would have reduced the negative biopsy rate from 19% to 14%, but five cases of high grade disease and 25 cases of low grade disease would have been missed. If we had also included women aged > 50 years in this model, the negative biopsy rate would have dropped from 19% to 15%, with only one case of high grade disease and 11 cases of low grade disease missed. All these women would require continued cytological and colposcopic surveillance. Importantly, no cases of invasion would have been missed. CONCLUSION: Using a predictive model can reduce the number of negative LLETZ specimens, but at the expense of continued cytological and colposcopic surveillance and cannot be recommended in normal practice. This raises the question whether current standards for negative histology in LLETZ specimens are set unrealistically high.

A comparison of the side effects of prilocaine with felypressin and lignocaine with adrenaline in large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix: results of a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that prilocaine with felypressin causes fewer side effects than lignocaine with adrenaline when performing large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. DESIGN: Randomised trial. SETTING: Colposcopy clinic in a large district general hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred consecutive women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. METHODS: Two different local anaesthetic combinations (prilocaine with felypressin and lignocaine with adrenaline) were compared in women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone. Prospective collection of clinical and treatment data was undertaken with scoring using an ordinal scale of pain experienced by the women during the procedure. Peri-operative blood loss and any side effects were also recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Side effects associated with the local anaesthetic agents. RESULTS: Lignocaine with adrenaline resulted in less blood loss (P = 0.006) but was more likely to cause side effects, such as feeling faint (P = 0.017) and shaking (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prilocaine with felypressin causes fewer side effects than lignocaine with adrenaline and is therefore the preferred local anaesthetic combination for large loop excision of the transformation zone.

Do routine antibiotics after loop diathermy excision reduce morbidity?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether routinely giving an antibiotic after loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone reduced post-operative vaginal loss. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, double-blind placebo controlled parallel study. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred women undergoing loop diathermy excision in a colposcopy clinic. INTERVENTION: Administration of either ofloxacin 400 mg (2x200 mg) once daily for 5 days or an identical placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Vaginal loss, assessed using a pictorial chart. RESULTS: No significant difference in post-operative vaginal loss was found. CONCLUSION: Routine antibiotic prophylaxis after loop diathermy excision is not justified.