The nanotopography of SiO2 particles impacts the selectivity and 3D fold of bound allergens.

A detailed description of the changes that occur during the formation of protein corona represents a fundamental question in nanoscience, given that it not only impacts the behaviour of nanoparticles but also affects the bound proteins. Relevant questions include whether proteins selectively bind particles, whether a specific orientation is preferred for binding, and whether particle binding leads to a modulation of their 3D fold. For allergens, it is important to answer these questions given that all these effects can modify the allergenic response of atopic individuals. These potential impacts on the bound allergen are closely related to the specific properties of the involved nanoparticles. One important property influencing the formation of protein corona is the nanotopography of the particles. Herein, we studied the effect of nanoparticle porosity on allergen binding using mesoporous and non-porous SiO2 NPs. We investigated (i) the selectivity of allergen binding from a mixture such as crude pollen extract, (ii) whether allergen binding results in a preferred orientation, (iii) the influence of binding on the conformation of the allergen, and (iv) how the binding affects the allergenic response. Nanotopography was found to play a major role in the formation of protein corona, impacting the physicochemical and biological properties of the NP-bound allergen. The porosity of the surface of the SiO2 nanoparticles resulted in a higher binding capacity with pronounced selectivity for (preferentially) binding the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1. Furthermore, the binding of Bet v 1 to the mesoporous rather than the non-porous SiO2 nanoparticles influenced the 3D fold of the protein, resulting in at least partial unfolding. Consequently, this conformational change influenced the allergenic response, as observed by mediator release assays employing the sera of patients and immune effector cells. For an in-depth understanding of the bio-nano interactions, the properties of the particles need to be considered not only regarding the identity and morphology of the material, but also their nanotopography, given that porosity may greatly influence the structure, and hence the biological behaviour of the bound proteins. Thus, thorough structural investigations upon the formation of protein corona are important when considering immunological outcomes, as particle binding can influence the allergenic response elicited by the bound allergen.

Mechanisms of Particles in Sensitization, Effector Function and Therapy of Allergic Disease.

Humans have always been in contact with natural airborne particles from many sources including biologic particulate matter (PM) which can exhibit allergenic properties. With industrialization, anthropogenic and combustion-derived particles have become a major fraction. Currently, an ever-growing number of diverse and innovative materials containing engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are being developed with great expectations in technology and medicine. Nanomaterials have entered everyday products including cosmetics, textiles, electronics, sports equipment, as well as food, and food packaging. As part of natural evolution humans have adapted to the exposure to particulate matter, aiming to protect the individual's integrity and health. At the respiratory barrier, complications can arise, when allergic sensitization and pulmonary diseases occur in response to particle exposure. Particulate matter in the form of plant pollen, dust mites feces, animal dander, but also aerosols arising from industrial processes in occupational settings including diverse mixtures thereof can exert such effects. This review article gives an overview of the allergic immune response and addresses specifically the mechanisms of particulates in the context of allergic sensitization, effector function and therapy. In regard of the first theme (i), an overview on exposure to particulates and the functionalities of the relevant immune cells involved in allergic sensitization as well as their interactions in innate and adaptive responses are described. As relevant for human disease, we aim to outline (ii) the potential effector mechanisms that lead to the aggravation of an ongoing immune deviation (such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, etc.) by inhaled particulates, including NPs. Even though adverse effects can be exerted by (nano)particles, leading to allergic sensitization, and the exacerbation of allergic symptoms, promising potential has been shown for their use in (iii) therapeutic approaches of allergic disease, for example as adjuvants. Hence, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is introduced and the role of adjuvants such as alum as well as the current understanding of their mechanisms of action is reviewed. Finally, future prospects of nanomedicines in allergy treatment are described, which involve modern platform technologies combining immunomodulatory effects at several (immuno-)functional levels.

Nanomaterials in the Context of Type 2 Immune Responses-Fears and Potentials.

The type 2 immune response is an adaptive immune program involved in defense against parasites, detoxification, and wound healing, but is predominantly known for its pathophysiological effects, manifesting as allergic disease. Engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are non-self entities that, to our knowledge, do not stimulate detrimental type 2 responses directly, but have the potential to modulate ongoing reactions in various ways, including the delivery of substances aiming at providing a therapeutic benefit. We review, here, the state of knowledge concerning the interaction of NPs with type 2 immune responses and highlight their potential as a multifunctional platform for therapeutic intervention.