A phase 1b clinical trial of the CD40-activating antibody CP-870,893 in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Data from murine models suggest that CD40 activation may synergize with cytotoxic chemotherapy. We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile and to explore immunological biomarkers of the CD40-activating antibody CP-870,893 with cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had confirmed MPM, ECOG performance status 0-1, and measurable disease. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 and CP-870,893 on day 8 of a 21-day cycle for maximum 6 cycles with up to 6 subsequent cycles single-agent CP-870,893. Immune cell subset changes were examined weekly by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated at three dose levels. The MTD of CP-870,893 was 0.15 mg/kg, and was exceeded at 0.2 mg/kg with one grade 4 splenic infarction and one grade 3 confusion and hyponatraemia. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in most patients (80%) following CP-870,893. Haematological toxicities were consistent with cisplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy. Six partial responses (40%) and 9 stable disease (53%) as best response were observed. The median overall survival was 16.5 months; the median progression-free survival was 6.3 months. Three patients survived beyond 30 months. CD19+ B cells decreased over 6 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (P < 0.001) with a concomitant increase in the proportion of CD27+ memory B cells (P < 0.001) and activated CD86+CD27+ memory B cells (P < 0.001), as an immunopharmacodynamic marker of CD40 activation. CONCLUSIONS: CP-870,893 with cisplatin and pemetrexed is safe and tolerable at 0.15 mg/kg, although most patients experience CRS. While objective response rates are similar to chemotherapy alone, three patients achieved long-term survival. AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: ACTRN12609000294257.

The aggregation of early-onset melanoma in young Western Australian families.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the familial aggregation of melanoma or its co-aggregation with other cancers using whole-population based designs. This study aimed to investigate aggregation patterns in young Western Australian families, using population-based linked health data to identify individuals born in Western Australia between 1974 and 2007, their known relatives, and all incident cancer diagnoses within the resulting 1,506,961 individuals. METHODS: Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare the risk of melanoma for first-degree relatives of melanoma cases to that for first-degree relatives of controls, with bootstrapping used to account for correlations within families. The risk of (i) developing melanoma based on the number of first-degree relatives with other cancers, and (ii) developing non-melanoma cancers based on the number of first-degree relatives diagnosed with melanoma was also investigated. RESULTS: First-degree relatives of melanoma cases had a significantly greater incidence of melanoma than first-degree relatives of individuals not affected with melanoma (Hazard Ratio (HR)=3.58, 95% bootstrap confidence interval (CI): 2.43-5.43). Sensitivity analyses produced a higher hazard ratio estimate when restricted to melanoma cases diagnosed before 40 years of age (HR=3.77, bootstrap 95% CI: 2.49-6.39) and a lower estimate when only later-onset cases (>40 years) were considered (HR=2.45, bootstrap 95% CI: 1.23-4.82). No significant evidence was found for co-aggregation between melanoma and any other cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated a strong familial basis of melanoma, with the higher than expected hazard ratio observed likely to reflect early-age at onset cases in this young cohort, supported by the results of the sensitivity analyses. Exploratory analyses suggested that the determinants of melanoma causing the observed aggregation within families may be independent of other malignancies, although these analyses were limited by the young age of the sample. Determining familial aggregation patterns will provide valuable knowledge regarding improved clinical risk prediction and the underlying biological mechanisms of melanoma and other cancers.

Mycobacterium mimicking metastatic melanoma.

We present three patients with lung nodules with an antecedent history of primary cutaneous melanoma or metastasis of melanoma to extrathoracic lymph nodes. Based on radiological findings, it was suspected that these patients had metastatic disease. Subsequent investigations confirmed the cause of the nodules was non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection. We discuss the similarities in symptoms and radiological features between atypical mycobacterial infections and metastatic disease and why a biopsy is important prior to planning a patient's treatment.

Overexpression and altered glycosylation of MUC1 in malignant mesothelioma.

Current interest in the MUC1/EMA mucin relates to its role in malignancy, and its potential as a therapeutic target. MUC1/EMA expression has been observed in the majority of epithelioid mesotheliomas. However, little is known of the characteristics of MUC1/EMA in mesothelioma. Herein, we studied the cell surface and soluble expression of the MUC1/EMA glycoprotein, and determined the mRNA and genomic expression profiles in mesothelioma. We found that the anti-MUC1 antibody, E29, was the most diagnostically useful of seven antibody clones examined with a sensitivity of 84% (16 out of 19 cases) and no false positive results. MUC1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in mesothelioma samples than in benign mesothelial cells. No amplification of the MUC1 gene was observed by FISH. Seven of 9 mesothelioma samples expressed MUC1-secreted mRNA isoform in addition to the archetypal MUC1/transmembrane form. CA15.3 (soluble MUC1) levels were significantly higher in the serum of mesothelioma patients than in healthy controls but were not significantly different to levels in patients with benign asbestos-related disease. CA15-3 in effusions could differentiate malignant from benign effusions but were not specific for mesothelioma. Thus, as in other cancers, alterations in MUC1 biology occur in mesothelioma and these results suggest that specific MUC1 characteristics may be useful for mesothelioma diagnosis and should also be investigated as a potential therapeutic target.

The multikinase inhibitor midostaurin (PKC412A) lacks activity in metastatic melanoma: a phase IIA clinical and biologic study.

Midostaurin (PKC412A), N-benzoyl-staurosporine, potently inhibits protein kinase C alpha (PKCalpha), VEGFR2, KIT, PDGFR and FLT3 tyrosine kinases. In mice, midostaurin slows growth and delays lung metastasis of melanoma cell lines. We aimed to test midostaurin's safety, efficacy and biologic activity in a Phase IIA clinical trial in patients with metastatic melanoma. Seventeen patients with advanced metastatic melanoma received midostaurin 75 mg p.o. t.i.d., unless toxicity or disease progression supervened. Patient safety was assessed weekly, and tumour response was assessed clinically or by CT. Tumour biopsies and plasma samples obtained at entry and after 4 weeks were analysed for midostaurin concentration, PKC activity and multidrug resistance. No tumour responses were seen. Two (12%) patients had stable disease for 50 and 85 days, with minor response in one. The median overall survival was 43 days. Seven (41%) discontinued treatment with potential toxicity, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or fatigue. One patient had >50% reduction in PKC activity. Tumour biopsies showed two PKC isoforms relatively insensitive to midostaurin, out of three patients tested. No modulation of multidrug resistance was demonstrated. At this dose schedule, midostaurin did not show clinical or biologic activity against metastatic melanoma. This negative trial reinforces the importance of correlating biologic and clinical responses in early clinical trials of targeted therapies.

Detection of metastatic disease in patients with uveal melanoma using positron emission tomography.

OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) is of proven value in the detection of metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, little is known about its value in uveal melanoma (UM). In this study the results of FDG-PET in patients with UM were evaluated. METHODS: Patients with UM recorded in the Sydney Melanoma Unit database who had been assessed with FDG-PET were selected. Comparative data (imaging or histopathology) providing information about metastatic disease were obtained within 14 weeks of the FDG-PET study and compared with the FDG-PET result. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of liver metastases (LMs) by FDG-PET were calculated. RESULTS: FDG-PET was performed in 22 patients with UM between April 1993 and March 2003. The presence of at least one focus of metastatic melanoma was confirmed in 14 of 18 patients with positive FDG-PET, and three of four negative FDG-PET studies were confirmed. LMs were demonstrated by FDG-PET in 17 patients. In 15 of these patients this finding was confirmed with anatomical imaging. In two patients LMs indicated by FDG-PET initially appeared to be false positive, but in one of them the diagnosis was confirmed after longer follow-up. Seven of the confirmed lesions were isolated LMs. For LMs FDG-PET showed sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%, 67% and 90% respectively, a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET is a valuable investigation for the detection of LMs in UM patients. It appears to be particularly useful in the detection of isolated LMs that are potentially resectable.

Detection of unsuspected spinal cord compression in melanoma patients by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography.

AIM: Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose can detect early or small metastatic deposits of melanoma and guide subsequent correlative anatomical imaging and treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the value of PET in demonstrating spinal cord compression by otherwise unsuspected metastatic disease. METHODS: Reports of 1365 PET studies performed on patients with melanoma were reviewed. Fifty patients considered to be at risk of spinal cord compression on the basis of PET were identified and 35 patients were analysed. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography were used to confirm or refute the diagnosis. The symptoms and signs at the time of PET and follow-up status were compared between patients with and without confirmed spinal cord compression. RESULTS: In nine patients (26%) compression of the spinal cord or adjacent neurological structures was confirmed and eight of these patients had immediate treatment. Survival was poor in both patient groups, but three patients with confirmed compression maintained good neurological functional status following treatment. CONCLUSION: PET can detect imminent, unsuspected spinal cord compression in patients with metastatic melanoma. Immediate anatomical imaging of the spine is recommended in patients who have evidence of spinal cord compression on PET.

Docetaxel and carboplatin is an active regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in Caucasian and Asian patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report response rates, survival and toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following docetaxel and carboplatin, and to explore potential differences in these end points between Caucasian and Asian patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients of good performance status with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were entered on a phase II study at three sites in Australia and Singapore. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 were given every 3 weeks. Response to treatment and toxicity were graded by standard criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and subgroups compared by the log-rank test. Cox's proportional hazards regression was used to determine which potentially explanatory variables independently affected the outcome. RESULTS: The response rate was 39% (95% confidence interval 27% to 52%), and 42% in evaluable patients. Response occurred in 65% of Asian and 31% of Caucasian patients (P = 0.01). Ethnicity was the only significant predictor of response in multivariate analysis. The 1-year survival rate was 53%. Performance status (P = 0.021), ethnicity (P = 0.035) and presence of bone or liver metastases (P = 0.011) were independent predictors of overall survival. Neutropenia (grade IV in 73% of patients), febrile neutropenia (26% patients) and diarrhea (grade III/IV in 11% of patients) were the major treatment related toxicities. A high rate (three of six) of febrile neutropenia in Singapore, including one treatment-related death in the initial patients treated, resulted in a reduction in the carboplatin dose to AUC 4.5 at that site. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is active in advanced NSCLC. The potential impact of ethnicity on efficacy and toxicity of treatment requires further investigation.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in advanced cancer: dose escalation possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, but not with prophylactic antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status 0 to 2, who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen were treated with docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide repeated every 21 days. The cyclophosphamide dose was fixed at 600 mg/m(2) and the dose levels studied were: docetaxel/epirubicin; 60/60, 75/60, 75/75, 75/90, 85/90 and 85/105 mg/m(2). There was provision for the addition of prophylactic ciprofloxacin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in separate steps if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia related. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were entered and all were assessable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity, predominantly febrile neutropenia, was surprisingly seen at the first dose level. The addition of prophylactic ciprofloxacin did not permit dose escalation, but dose escalation was possible with the addition of G-CSF. The highest administered dose level with G-CSF was docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 105 mg/m(2) with DLTs in five of six patients. Treatment was well tolerated in 10 patients treated at the recommended dose level (85/90) with only one patient experiencing DLT. Responses were seen in a range of malignancies including breast and anaplastic thyroid cancers. No significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed, but a transient increase in epirubicinol plasma concentration occurred during and after docetaxel infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose level of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2), epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) with G-CSF support has a favorable toxicity profile and is suitable for further investigation in phase II and III trials.

Phase II trial of pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA, LY231514) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed therapy for chemotherapy-naïve patients with surgically incurable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients received pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Restaging was performed after every two cycles of therapy and toxicity was assessed at each cycle of pemetrexed. In the absence of disease progression or undue toxicity, treatment was continued for a maximum of 12 cycles. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (median age 59 years; range 39-74 years) received a median of four cycles of pemetrexed. Nineteen patients (32%) had a ECOG performance status (PS) of two and 39 patients (66%) had stage IV disease. The most common histological sub-types were adenocarcinoma (20 patients, 34%) and large cell (18 patients, 31%). Sixteen patients (27%) had received prior radiotherapy. Nine patients achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 15.8% (95% confidence interval CI 7% to 28%). The median duration of response was 4.9 months, and the median survival was 7.2 months. The principal toxicities were myelosuppression and rash. While grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was seen in 25 patients (42%), only two patients (3%) developed grade 3 infection. Eighteen patients (31%) developed grade 3 or 4 cutaneous toxicity, which improved with prophylactic oral dexamethasone administered for 3 days beginning the day before pemetrexed treatment. Asymptomatic elevations in hepatic biochemistry (especially alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase) were seen in 47 patients (80%); however, these did not interfere with the dose or schedule of pemetrexed and returned to normal levels throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study confirming the encouraging single-agent activity of pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC. In addition, this study demonstrates that a dose of 600 mg/m2 can be delivered safely; however, treatment should be restricted to patients with a PS of 0 or 1. The results of combination studies are awaited with interest.

Phase II study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

The combination of paclitaxel and etoposide was evaluated in a phase II study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-five patients, median age 61, received treatment with paclitaxel 200 mg/m (2) intravenous over 3 h on day 1, and oral etoposide, 100 mg daily on days 1-5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of nine cycles, or until progression occurred. Twenty-eight patients had stage IV disease, and seven patients had stage IIIA or B disease. There was one complete and seven partial responses (overall response rate, 23%). Two of these responses were in patients with stage III disease (29%) and six in patients with stage IV disease (21%). Median survival was 8.7 months, and 36% of patients were alive at 1 year. There were no treatment-related deaths and little grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity although grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 60% of patients (33% of cycles). There were four episodes of febrile neutropenia. The combination of paclitaxel and oral etoposide is active in advanced NSCLC and can be delivered with acceptable toxicity.

Optimizing the erythromycin breath test for use in cancer patients.

The erythromycin breath test (EBT) is a putative in vivo probe for drug metabolism by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Because many anticancer drugs are metabolized by this system, we sought to further develop the EBT as a tool for predicting the clearance, in cancer patients, of drugs metabolized by CYP3A4. Sixteen adult patients with incurable cancer were studied. The EBT was performed on day 1 and breath sampled after the i.v. injection of 4 microCi of 14C-erythromycin. The breath 14CO2 flux (CERt) was estimated at 11 time points over 2 h. On day 2, the EBT was repeated midway through a 10-min infusion of 100 mg of erythromycin lactobionate, and the plasma pharmacokinetics of erythromycin were determined. The infusion of 100 mg of erythromycin did not modify the EBT results significantly. The values of the conventional EBT parameter CER20 min obtained on day 1 were comparable for most subjects (0.03-0.06% dose/min), with the exception of an individual receiving the known CYP3A4 inducers dexamethasone and phenytoin who returned a value of 0.14% dose/min. There was no significant correlation between any of the conventional EBT parameters and erythromycin clearance. However, two parameters reflecting early emergence of breath radioactivity (1/TMAX and CER3 min/CERMAX) correlated significantly with erythromycin clearance (P = 0.005 and 0.006, respectively). Novel parameters derived from the EBT are significantly correlated with the clearance of erythromycin even in the presence of confounding factors, such as metastatic liver disease, altered protein binding, and comedication. These parameters may enable dose optimization of cytotoxics metabolized by CYP3A4.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel and epirubicin in advanced cancer.

The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel with and without G-CSF (granulocyte colony stimulating factor) support and to investigate whether epirubicin pharmacokinetics are altered by paclitaxel. Patients with advanced cancer, performance status 0-2, and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction who had received up to 1 prior chemotherapy regimen were treated with epirubicin followed by a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel repeated every 3 weeks. Dose levels studied were (paclitaxel/epirubicin) 155/75, 175/75, 175/90, 200/90 mg/m2 without G-CSF and 175/90 mg/m2 with G-CSF. Thirty-five patients were entered and all were assessable for toxicity. The dose-limiting dose level was 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 90 mg/m2 epirubicin with limiting toxicities of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea and esophagitis. The addition of G-CSF did not allow escalation of epirubicin. No significant cardiac toxicity was observed. Epirubicin pharmacokinetics were studied during the first 2 cycles in 6 patients, who were randomized to receive 1 cycle with no interval between the completion of the epirubicin and the commencement of the paclitaxel infusion and the other cycle with a 72-hour interval between the drugs. There was no substantial effect of paclitaxel on epirubicin or epirubicinol pharmacokinetics, although there was a marginal increase in glucoronidation. In conclusion, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and epirubicin 75 mg/m2 is recommended for phase II and III studies.

Overview of docetaxel (Taxotere)/cisplatin combination in non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although it prolongs survival only modestly. Single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) is highly active against NSCLC. The activity and tolerability of two docetaxel/ cisplatin regimens were therefore investigated in two multicenter phase II studies, one in Australia and one in France. Chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable NSCLC received either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 3 weekly (n = 47; Australian study) or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for three cycles then every 6 weeks (n = 51; French study). The majority of the population (74%) had metastatic disease. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for efficacy. Overall response rates were 36% (95% confidence interval, 25 to 47) in all evaluable patients and 34% in patients with metastases. Median duration of response was 6 months, with a 4-month median time to progression. Median survival time was 9 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 34%. A median of four (range, one to nine) treatment cycles were administered. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 14% of patients. Severe infection, which occurred in less than 7% of patients, led to two toxic deaths. Other severe toxicities were rare, with severe stomatitis and severe neurosensory side effects reported in 2% and 1%, respectively, of treated patients. No severe fluid retention occurred. Docetaxel/cisplatin, administered as two different schedules, is well tolerated and exhibits efficacy in the range of the most established combinations in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Repetitive high-dose therapy with ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and conventional-dose paclitaxel delivered every 28 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 69 treatment cycles, 59 were delivered and fifteen patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were renal tubular acidosis, encephalopathy, mucositis and enterocolitis. There was one treatment-related hemorrhagic death. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended doses for phase II or III studies are ifosfamide (10 g/m2), thiotepa (350 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2).

Ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin: regimens which effectively mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells while demonstrating anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

For patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation, an important prerequisite is a mobilization regimen that efficiently mobilizes PBPCs while producing an effective anti-tumor effect. We prospectively evaluated ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for mobilization efficiency, toxicity and disease response in 37 patients. Patients received two cycles of the ifosfamide-based regimen; ifosfamide (5 g/m2 with conventional-dose cycle and 6 g/m2 with mobilization cycle) with either 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin (if limited prior anthracycline and/or progression more than 12 months after an anthracycline-based regimen) or 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. For the mobilization cycle, all patients received additional G-CSF (10 microg/kg SC, daily) commencing 24 h after completion of chemotherapy. The target yield was >6x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy. The mobilization therapy was well tolerated and the peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were days 10-13 with no significant differences in the PB CD34+ cells mobilization kinetics between the ifosfamide-doxorubicin vs. ifosfamide-paclitaxel regimens. The median PBPC CD34+ cell content ranged from 2.9 to 4.0x10(6)/kg per day during days 9-14. After a median of 3 (range 1-5) collection days, the median total CD34+ cell, CFU-GM and MNC for all 44 individual sets of collections was 9.2x10(6)/kg (range 0.16-54.9), 37x10(4)/kg (range 5.7-247) and 7.3x10(8)/kg (range 2.1-26.1), respectively. The PBPC target yield was achieved in 35 of the 37 patients. The overall response rate for the 31 evaluable patients was 68% with 10% having progressive disease. Thirty-three patients have subsequently received high-dose therapy consisting of three planned cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with each cycle supported with PBPCs. Rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery has been observed. Ifosfamide with G-CSF in combination with doxorubicin or paclitaxel achieves effective mobilization of PBPC and anti-tumor activity with minimal toxicity.

Low-dose versus standard-dose lenograstim prophylaxis after chemotherapy: a randomized, crossover comparison.

PURPOSE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administered prophylactically after chemotherapy reduces the duration and severity of neutropenia. This randomized crossover study was designed to assess whether a lower dose of G-CSF is as effective as a standard dose of 5 microg/kg daily. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received standard-dose chemotherapy regimens expected to cause neutropenia received G-CSF (lenograstim) that started the day after chemotherapy for 14 days or until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered to greater than 10 x 10(9)/L. The lenograstim dose was randomly allocated to be 2 or 5 microg/kg daily in the first cycle of chemotherapy and crossed over to the alternate dose for the second cycle. The study was designed to accrue 40 assessable patients to provide a power of 80% to detect a difference in duration of neutropenia of 1 day. Fifty-two patients were randomized to treatment and 43 patients completed two cycles of identical chemotherapy. RESULTS: There was little neutropenia irrespective of the dose used. Twenty-three patients (53%) had no grade III or IV neutropenia and 30 patients (70%) had no grade IV neutropenia. Crossover trial methodology was used to assess the difference in outcome caused by the lower dose compared with the standard dose (estimated treatment effect). There was no significant difference in the measures of neutropenia, hospitalization, or other clinical outcomes. The 95% confidence interval (one-sided) for the additional duration of neutropenia caused by the lower dose of lenograstim was 0.43 days or less for grade III or IV neutropenia and 0.34 days or less for grade IV neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Lenograstim 2 microg/kg provides similar protection to 5 microg/kg against neutropenia that complicates standard-dose chemotherapy. The use of a lower dose has important implications for the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic G-CSF therapy.

Phase I trial of cremophor EL with bolus doxorubicin.

Cremophor EL (cremophor), a component of the paclitaxel formulation, can potentially reverse P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance. A Phase I trial of cremophor as a 6-h infusion every 3 weeks was performed with bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2). The cremophor dose was escalated from 1 to 60 ml/m2. A standard paclitaxel premedication was given before cremophor. Using a bioassay, potentially active cremophor levels (> or = 1 microl/ml) were measured in plasma from patients receiving cremophor doses of 30, 45, and 60 ml/m2. A cross-over design was used to assess the influence of cremophor 30 ml/m2 on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol. The plasma area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of doxorubicin increased from 1448 +/- 350 to 1786 +/- 264 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02) in the presence of cremophor, whereas the AUC of doxorubicinol increased from 252 +/- 104 to 486 +/- 107 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02). This pharmacokinetic interaction was associated with significantly increased neutropenia. With reduction of the doxorubicin dose to 35 mg/m2, the cremophor dose was increased to 60 ml/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two of six patients after 45 ml/m2 and two of four patients after 60 ml/m2, which included febrile neutropenia and grade III cremophor-related toxicities of rash, pruritus, headache, and hypotension. All patients who received 45 ml/m2 cremophor reached plasma levels > or = 1.5 microl/ml, but at 60 ml/m2, only two of four reached this level, and the calculated plasma clearance of cremophor was significantly faster at this dose. One patient with hepatoma resistant to epirubicin achieved a near-complete response. Cremophor 45 ml/m2 over 6 h with 35 mg/m2 doxorubicin is recommended for further studies. The pharmacokinetic interaction between cremophor and doxorubicin is quantitatively similar to that described in trials of paclitaxel with doxorubicin and suggests that the cremophor in the paclitaxel formulation is responsible.

A phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide for relapsed or metastatic carcinoma of the cervix.

This study reports the results of a phase II trial of carboplatin 100 mg/m2 combined with etoposide 120 mg/m2 each given for 3 consecutive days every 28 days in women with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the cervix. Seventeen eligible patients were treated between August, 1990 and May, 1993. In the 16 evaluable patients, there were 2 complete responses, and no partial responses with an overall objective response rate of 12.5% (95% confidence interval 1.6%-38%). The main toxicities of this regimen related to myelosuppression and emesis. The combination of carboplatin and etoposide did not achieve either a better response rate or a substantially improved toxicity profile than is seen with single agent cisplatin.