Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Brux ; 11(1-2): 16-20, 1990.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2406832

RESUMO

In cervical dysplasia and neoplasia, recent studies have reported the unreliability of the pap smear. We have used a new screening technique, cervicography and have compared it to cervix cytology. We have performed biopsies under colposcopy as reference and quality control. On a series of 65 selected patients with pap smear screening program which were sent to the colposcopic triage, the cervicography is more sensitive (83%) than the pap smear (sensitivity: 42%). However, those two tests are from a specificity point of view, comparable (cervicography: 95% versus pap smear: 98%). The association of these two techniques has detected all the lesions: they seem to be complementary. In the Bordet Institute we decided to systematically perform both pap smear and cervicography for cervix screening.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento , Fotografação/métodos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Esfregaço Vaginal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...