When and how to operate on thoracic and lumbar spine fractures?

PURPOSE: To discuss when and how to operate on thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 77 consecutive patients with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures treated from 2000 to 2011; 28 patients experienced high-energy spinal trauma and 49 low-energy spinal trauma. Mean follow-up was 5 years (1-11 years). Surgical treatment was done in 15 patients with neurological deficits, and in 16 neurologically intact patients with fractures-dislocations, burst fractures and fractures with marked deformity. Non-surgical treatment was done in 46 neurologically intact patients with simple fracture configurations. Clinical and imaging examination and the Oswestry Disability Index (O.D.I.) questionnaire were obtained. RESULTS: All patients treated surgically maintained spinal alignment; patients with long fusion maintained the best alignment; however, they experienced back stiffness and moderate low back pain. Patients with combined posterior fusion and kyphoplasty experienced earlier recovery and improved sagittal correction. Mean O.D.I. was 22.4 and 14.2% at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Thirty six (78%) patients treated non-surgically were asymptomatic, 22 (48%) experienced mild residual kyphosis, 10 (22 %) developed marked deformity during their follow-up and were finally operated; mean O.D.I. was 28.6 and 12.1% at 3 and 12 months. No difference in O.D.I. was observed between patients who had surgical and non-surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive neurological deficits and/or mechanical instability of the spine are absolute indications for early surgical treatment. Younger patients with high-energy spinal trauma, unstable fractures and neurological deficits should be treated surgically in order to provide optimum conditions for neurologic recovery, early mobilization and possibly ambulation. Most cases can be adequately operated through a posterior only surgical approach; an anterior or combined approach is usually indicated for burst and thoracic spine fractures. Postoperative complications, more common infection and neurological deterioration may occur. Elderly, neurologically intact patients with low-energy, stable spinal fractures without marked spinal deformity may be successfully treated conservatively. Most of these patients will do well; however, follow-up for progressive posttraumatic deformity is required.

Acrometastases.

Metastases distal to the elbow and the knee (acrometastases) are rare, accounting for approximately 0.1 % of all cases. Acrometastases can appear in patients of every age, with men being twice as likely as women to be affected. The most common primary cancer site is the lung (>50 %), followed by the colon, breast and genito-urinary tract. They mainly appear in cancer patients with wide-spread disseminated disease. Rarely, they may be the first presentation of occult silent cancer, mimicking a benign condition. Current evidence supports that the tumor cells reach the bones of the hands through the circulation and not the lymphatic system; the malignant cells from the lungs have an easy access through the arterial circulation of the arms. The rare incidence of foot acrometastases is believed to be due to the lack of red marrow in these bones, a further distance from the primary cancer site, and the valveless paravertebral venous plexuses (Batson's plexuses), which allow retrograde tumor cell embolization through the iliofemoral venous system. Treatment depends on staging and tumor extent. Amputative surgery is the more common approach, especially for cancers with poor response to radiation therapy and chemotherapy. In the majority of cases, disarticulation of the ray is required to achieve wide margin resection. In the foot, amputation can be that of a ray, midfoot or transtibial, depending on the location and spread of the tumor. If unresectable, palliative treatment with radiation therapy, bisphosphonates and chemotherapy is recommended. The prognosis of the patients with acrometastatic cancer is poor; the mean survival time after diagnosis is <6 months. An exception seems to be the patients with renal cell carcinoma, if treated with radical surgical resection, and a long latency period between nephrectomy and metastasis has occurred.

Computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery.

Computer-assisted navigation has a role in some orthopedic procedures. It allows the surgeons to obtain real-time feedback and offers the potential to decrease intra-operative errors and optimize the surgical result. Computer-assisted navigation systems can be active or passive. Active navigation systems can either perform surgical tasks or prohibit the surgeon from moving past a predefined zone. Passive navigation systems provide intraoperative information, which is displayed on a monitor, but the surgeon is free to make any decisions he or she deems necessary. This article reviews the available types of computer-assisted navigation, summarizes the clinical applications and reviews the results of related series using navigation, and informs surgeons of the disadvantages and pitfalls of computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery.

Instrumentation related complications in spine surgery.

Spinal instrumentation constructs are frequently necessary for the surgical management of patients with variable spinal pathology. However, surgical complications may appear. These should be detected early and managed to achieve recovery and good functional outcome for the patient. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the most common instrumentation-related complications of spine surgery as well as a diagnostic plan and treatment options for the management of these challenging entities once they occur.

Computer-assisted navigation in knee surgery.

Although computer-assisted navigation has been used in clinical practice for more than 15 years, it has only recently started to gain acceptance in a variety of orthopedic procedures. Different types of computer-assisted navigation are available, which allow the surgeon to obtain real-time feedback and offer him the potential to decrease intraoperative errors. However, its increased cost and lacking evidence of long-term superiority have made many surgeons skeptical about its clinical usefulness. The scope of this article is to review the clinical applications of computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery of the knee joint.